KiSSFLOW and GitLab compete in workflow automation and DevOps lifecycle management. GitLab is generally seen as more robust due to its comprehensive features, while KiSSFLOW is sought after for its affordability and support options.
Features: KiSSFLOW is distinguished by its user-friendly business process automation, customizable integrations, and capability for virtual approvals. GitLab offers extensive DevOps functionality, including CI/CD automation, version control, and robust security features, making it ideal for complex DevOps needs.
Room for Improvement: KiSSFLOW can enhance scalability, API integration, and automate complex workflows. GitLab could improve by simplifying its interface, reducing resource intensity for deployment, and expanding feature accessibility for non-technical users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KiSSFLOW features an easy deployment model accessible even for organizations with limited IT expertise and provides strong customer service. GitLab's deployment is complex, requiring skilled technical resources but offers substantial support and detailed documentation to guide implementation.
Pricing and ROI: KiSSFLOW is cost-effective with lower upfront costs, ensuring strong ROI for smaller organizations or simple automation needs. GitLab has higher setup costs but promises significant returns by reducing development time and boosting productivity, serving well larger organizations needing comprehensive DevOps services.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
The UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.
GitLab is a great tool for developers, it lacks project planner features.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
The feature I appreciate the most about GitLab is its ease of use and compatibility, which allows for straightforward building and deployment processes.
GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.
It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
