Google Cloud Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention comparison

"It is user- friendly and has a easy integration."

"For Purview's natively integrated compliance across Azure, Dynamics 365, and Office 365, I would give it a 10 out of 10. It provides all the insights and information."

"I rate Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's stability a ten out of ten."

"The product can block the uploads to cloud services."

"Because everything is on Microsoft and we use Azure, integration with the product is easier. That's the most important thing when you use many Microsoft products. It's easier to integrate everything in one place."

"We can use Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to manage devices and site policies."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's responses are faster. Its installation is also reliable. The security score helps with the security part."

"The auto-labeling feature is definitely the most valuable feature. It goes in and labels the documents for you in different repositories. It covers the Outlook and Exchange repositories along with SharePoint and OneDrive. It is really helpful in those areas."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the mature O365 DLP, which works with SharePoint and Teams."

"Improvement are made as per client requirement."

"It could cover more solutions and technologies."

"A site can have different containers where you store data. We have always wanted to apply compliance, labels, and policies at the container level, rather than to an outer shell or at the site level. That is something we have been looking forward to and I believe Microsoft is already planning something like that."

"The tool's user interface and document fingerprinting have been very poor for my customers because uploading files manually can be problematic."

"The support is poor."

"Technical support is awful."

"The solution should provide better integration with other systems."

"We faced a performance issue with the tool when we didn't get alerts for file uploads."

"There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a learning curve for setting up the labels. Some of the setup wizards could be more helpful from an AI perspective. They can streamline the setup through more AI technologies so that you don't have to jump through so many hoops and different menus and dropdowns. It would be useful to have a setup wizard that is more hands-off and engaging for setting up the information type labels. If you tell them this is what we're trying to protect, it should basically start to lead you down that path of best practices. Such a feature would be great."

"You get the solution in a bundle if you get the E5 suite."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

"The product has the best price-to-performance ratio."

"If one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the price as one out of ten."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have an E5 license, and a part of understanding the E5 license is to see what all you get with it. If you really look at it from that standpoint, you get a lot of value. You have Defender and all its security features in there as well. Their licensing is fairly flexible. They have different programs. We've seen ones where you could pay for up to three to five years in advance. There is also a monthly pay-as-you-go type of deal, but we're doing a yearly renewal and fixing the budget."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product."

"We are using the E3 license for Microsoft 365 with the E5 compliance license add-on."