GTB Technologies Inspector vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector comparison

GTB Technologies and Netwrix are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. GTB Technologies is ranked #31, while Netwrix is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5. GTB Technologies holds a 1.6% mindshare in DLP, compared to Netwrix’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GTB Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Netwrix users who would recommend it.

GTB Technologies Inspector

Read 8 GTB Technologies Inspector reviews

1,271 Views
1,233 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Read 29 Netwrix Endpoint Protector reviews

1,881 Views
1,881 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

GTB Technologies Inspector

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

GTB Technologies Inspector and Netwrix Endpoint Protector compete in the data protection sphere, focusing on preventing data loss and maintaining security. GTB Technologies Inspector appears to have the upper hand in pricing and customer support, while Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers more robust features, potentially justifying a higher cost.

Features: GTB Technologies Inspector offers sensitive data discovery, real-time content inspection, and single-agent deployment for DLP and data classification across multiple platforms. Netwrix Endpoint Protector provides sophisticated data monitoring, device control, and enforced encryption, with strong integration across Windows, macOS, and Linux platforms.

Room for Improvement: GTB Technologies Inspector could enhance document fingerprinting efficiency and memory usage impacts. Expanding licensing options and third-party integration could also benefit users. Netwrix Endpoint Protector might focus on streamlining policy granularity and enhancing support for diverse application types. Increasing flexibility in role-based access and simplifying user interfaces could further improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GTB Technologies Inspector offers a straightforward deployment process with strong customer service. Netwrix Endpoint Protector has a more complex deployment model, requiring extensive documentation and training resources but provides comprehensive support channels.

Pricing and ROI: GTB Technologies Inspector is generally more cost-effective upfront, offering quicker ROI with lower setup costs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector, despite its higher cost, provides advanced features that may lead to greater savings in data security management over time.

To learn more, read our detailed GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,821 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GTB Technologies Inspector

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of GTB Technologies Inspector is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netwrix Endpoint Protector is 1.9%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Netwrix Endpoint Protector	1.9%
GTB Technologies Inspector	1.6%
Other	96.5%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Marcelo Grandchamp

General Manager (Founder and Owner) at nnhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/marcelograndchamp/ovax

Enables organizations to monitor the network and protect themselves from data leakage

The initial setup process is very simple and easy. We have no issues to do it for ourselves or our customers. The deployment takes less than 20 days. The integration is very simple. However, first, we must understand what we want to have on our network and what we want to prevent. If we don't have this information before we start the configuration, we will be lost. We must know what kind of protection we need in our company. We have LGPD in Brazil. It is similar to GDPR in Europe. It prevents any personal information from being linked to other companies without permission. We have to take care of the personal information of our customers, employees, and partners. To deploy the tool, we must understand what we need to do. We must download the whole package and have our infrastructure ready to receive it. We must get the SSL certification and start to configure our platform. When the process is finished, we must roll out a small portion of our network to ensure everything will be well. After that, we must do the full rollout.

Read full review

Sivakumar Mahathevan

Head of Sales and Technical - Malaysia at Halodata

Provides robust compliance with advanced threat protection and user-friendly interfaces

The features of Netwrix Endpoint Protector that I have found most valuable so far are the two main key modules which are Content Aware Protection (CAP) and Device Control (DC), which is the hottest selling item from my perspective as a consultant. I find CAP and DC valuable because they are very granular in nature and it's easily understood and easily configured. That's why it's easy for us to actually position this product to any organizations with no complications. My impression on the multi-layered protection features of this solution is quite positive because now they've expanded to more things in the DLP itself, that are as good as an enterprise DLP solution. Therefore, I feel that in terms of its pricing values and so on, it is very competitive. I assess the value of the comprehensive reporting and auditing capabilities provided by Netwrix Endpoint Protector as very good because I am a user myself prior to this, before becoming a reseller and now a distributor. I am actually a walking dictionary for this particular product. The comprehensive reporting and auditing capabilities are quite granular in terms of gaining insights. We can actually deep dive into quite a lot of things and find a lot of information that they already have. Assuming if there's a breach, we will be able to know exactly where the breach has occurred and what has occurred, and they are quite granular in how they report their information, including their logs. Therefore, they conform to all compliance regulatory bodies too. My impression of the centralized management console feature of Netwrix Endpoint Protector is that it is one of the simplest centralized monitoring features that even a kid would understand, which is what we need in today's world—nothing complicated. My impression of the data encryption and control over portable storage devices features of this solution is that they are very good, especially the device controls, which I really enjoy using, particularly when it comes to portable devices USBs and the encryption tools that they have, which is another module called E-lock, or enforce encryption, that they do have. They are well-protected along those lines.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."

"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."

"The monitoring features are valuable."

"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."

"This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."

"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."

"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."

"The product has a centralized console for everything."

"All of the features are effective, but the highlight feature of the product was the data layer inspection. When we talk about a DLP product, data packet inspection is very important. Securing data at rest is easy, but securing data in transit is challenging. We used it comprehensively to secure end drives, data transfers, secure hard drives, and end-user machines. It proved monumental in our operations."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution is the device control, which manages any portable device connected to the endpoint, and content-aware protection, which controls data in motion from the endpoint to outside, like when users try to upload data to a web browser or an instant messaging application."

"I like the data protection feature. Our users were working on a client's CRM application with a lot of client-related EIA information. We did not want the users to be able to send any of this data outside. I also like its ability to protect against data leaks via emails and social media. I like that you can deploy it quickly, and it requires no training."

"The interface is pretty user-friendly, neatly explained, and simple to use."

"It is easy to manage the DLP between MacOS and Linux."

"The core of its value lies in obtaining logs remotely and exercising control over what employees can or cannot use."

"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to support Linux operating systems."

"The most valuable features are Device Control, Content-Aware Protection, Enforced Encryption, and eDiscovery."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pros

Cons

"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."

"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."

"The tool should include better AI features."

"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."

"The solution’s performance must be improved."

"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."

"The performance could be better."

"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."

"It needs to improve in terms of policy customization."

"We are using it to only apply media restrictions. When we are installing a new agent, we have to install EPP manually on a device. It would be great if the installations can be done from the server instead of me going to each PC or device to implement EPP or using a policy. They should have some sort of system so that a domain admin can install EPP on all PCs from a central manager."

"The reports and analysis could be improved. There could be a little more data, and the logs could be a little more granular, but it's nothing major. It does what it needs to do, and it's fine."

"There are times when the server needs to be updated, and it would help if I got a notification for when the newest version comes out, because at the moment, I'm going in every now and then and checking. Sometimes it comes out and I didn't know it had come out."

"Sometimes, it should try to focus on one thing rather than multiple things. Endpoint Protector does device control very well, which is why we use that particular function."

"Endpoint Protector, in particular, had some features to be desired for the Mac operating system."

"I would rate the role-based access features for administrators a six out of ten. There's work to be done on the granularity of roles that can be assigned to an administrator but there is role-based administrator access present. That's why it's not a zero rating."

"If CoSoSys comes up with a suite of Host DLP, along with Network DLP and SaaS DLP, it will cover all of the aspects of a DLP solution."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They offer a lot of features in a single bundle. So, if you want to remove some features from GTB, you can remove those. You don't need to buy those, and the price will reduce accordingly. I am very happy with the pricing."

"Its price is very reasonable and competitive."

"The tool is not expensive."

"When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."

"The tool has a fair price."

"The tool's pricing is affordable and based on the number of endpoints."

"The product has average pricing."

"I don't have any issue with the licensing and pricing. I would love for it to be cheaper, but at the same time I'm getting a lot from it."

"Pricing is quite reasonable. For smaller organizations, it lets them get into the product domain, whereas a lot of vendors won't even talk to them. CoSoSys is just about at that sweet spot of being serious enough that you have to budget for it, but at the same time, affordable enough that the value is well worth it."

"The software comes with a higher price tag when compared to other DLP solutions."

"The pricing depends on the customers."

"The solution’s pricing is a normal industry standard and depends on customers and salespersons."

"When I last renewed the license it was for a two-year term, and they gave me the second year at half price."

"The pricing is very competitive and is cheaper in comparison to that of other solutions. It makes it an easy decision to go with EPP for the data loss prevention infrastructure."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GTB Technologies Inspector?

The tool should include better AI features. It must enable us to make some predictions based on the behavior of my network or the end users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GTB Technologies Inspector?

We use Microsoft 365. We use GTB Technologies Inspector as a CASB solution to protect us from any data leakage in Microsoft 365. We can monitor the network all the time to see all the data that is ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GTB Technologies Inspector?

The maintenance is easy. We are resellers and partners. We have technical people specialized in maintenance. The TCO is very low. Sometimes, we have to upgrade to keep the solution on the latest ve...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Endpoint Protector?

When we started, the price was reasonable, but it has been increasing over time. I rate the price as four, indicating it is a bit high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Endpoint Protector?

The licensing issue was eventually resolved by the team, but the Linux client issue persisted. Not all the policies applied to the Linux clients were as effective as those for Mac and Windows. That...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Endpoint Protector?

Our main use case involved compliance requirements stating that we wanted to have DLP functionality on our endpoint devices, mainly regarding device control for USB peripheral ports. We wanted to p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 24% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 16% of the time

Trellix DLP vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 9% of the time

Safetica ONE vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 5% of the time

More GTB Technologies Inspector Competitors

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 17% of the time

Safetica ONE vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 8% of the time

WatchGuard Firebox vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Download GTB Technologies Inspector product report

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

January 2026

Download Netwrix Endpoint Protector product report

Also Known As

Inspector, GTB Technologies DLP

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector

Overview

Inspector is Inspection Software to manage any type of inspection to aid compliance, reduce risk, eliminate paperwork, and make you audit ready. Define what you want to inspect, when, the checks to be carried out, set pass, fail criteria, define incident creation rules, workflow and resolution deadlines. Use the mobile application to perform inspections on smart phone, tablet or mobile computer. Dashboards show compliance, incident rates and resolution activity. Start a 30 day free trial today.

GTB Technologies

Content Aware Protection
Scanning data in motion
Monitor, control and block file transfers. Detailed control through both content and context inspection.

Device Control
USB & peripheral port control
Lockdown, monitor and manage devices. Granular control based on Vendor ID, Product ID, Serial Number and more.

Enforced Encryption
Automatic USB encryption
Encrypt, manage and secure USB storage devices by safeguarding data in transit. Password-based, easy to use and very efficient.

eDiscovery
Scanning data at rest
Discover, encrypt and delete sensitive data. Detailed content and context inspection through manual or automatic scans

Netwrix

Sample Customers

Supya Security Software

Samsung, Toyota, Philips, Zeppelin, Western Union, eBay

Buyer's Guide

GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

February 2026

Free Report: GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.