Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM FileNet vs Laserfiche comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM FileNet
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
95
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Laserfiche
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
22nd
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Document Management Software (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of IBM FileNet is 10.4%, up from 9.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Laserfiche is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

Moshe Elbaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 23, 2024
A stable content management solution for document management
IBM FileNet is an enterprise content management solution. We use the solution for document management in the legal, insurance, and banking sectors We're implementing an on-premise solution. We're handling the installation of the product and customizing it to build a customized application…
CB
Jul 31, 2019
A powerful solution that offers BPM and automation to assist with our digital transformation
We use this solution for DMS, ECM, scan and imaging, plus workflows and forms solutions spread over the entire company This is a very complete and powerful solution. No code: We can address all of the features and functionalities with computer-minded people without having to call the IT Dept or…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"FileNet has the capabilities to meet compliance and regulatory requirements. It is very secure."
"It has the ability to mix document management and process automation."
"The most valuable features of IBM File Manager are workflow, content, and process capabilities."
"The most valuable features of FileNet are its comprehensive ability to store content, to get insights from the content, and to use that content for making decisions routed through workflow."
"The features that I have found most valuable include the Data Capture and Case Manager features."
"It has given us a whole new environment to do document management and document storage."
"The most valuable features are the interconnectivity and the collaboration. No longer do I have to wonder what system I need to go to for the data I need. I know it's in FileNet."
"There are a lot of valuable features, but the biggest advantage is that this system is stable; it's always online, it always works... once it's configured and running, we don't need to touch it and constantly make changes to it. It's a low-maintenance platform."
"This is a very complete and powerful solution."
 

Cons

"In terms of functionality, what customers might be looking for is a little more in terms of native-records retention. Records Management is an add-on product. If there were just a little more of that built into the core functionality, that would be helpful."
"In Content Navigator we want to see the ability to view different types of video... We are using HTML 5 but it's very limited... We definitely want to see support for most types of video formats in the market."
"I would like to see expanded search features, like content search."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The installation and configuration to start up needs expert level knowledge."
"This solution could be improved with the ability to present the file system from FileNet."
"For end-users there is a lack of administrative features. The interface of basic FileNet is not very good."
"I think the support could be better, and it could improve."
"We would like to see more features for RPA and AI."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is about $40,000, plus yearly maintenance."
"It is still a leading ECM solution provider, however the cost to implement and maintain are higher than other solutions."
"IBM FileNet is an expensive solution."
"The biggest issue is the cost of the FileNet, because the license cost is very high. If a customer doesn't have good technical guides that are aware of the license calculation, they will pay too much. FileNet's license calculation depends on the processor and number of users. So my advice to a new customer is to be very careful with your calculations before purchasing FileNet."
"We use extraction. Therefore, we can see 80 to 85 percent accuracy on data extraction. This reduces the manual indexing part, which is definitely a gain on performance efficiency."
"For the medium scale or large scale, I would recommend FileNet. FileNet is free of licensing expenses, thus good for the money. It is not expensive, but worth for the money, especially for medium scale and large scale industries."
"The platform is inexpensive."
"Yearly, we pay for the maintenance, which is $20,000."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
813,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
11%
Insurance Company
10%
Educational Organization
39%
Government
15%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM FileNet?
The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.
What needs improvement with IBM FileNet?
The solution’s pricing could be improved.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
D.L. Evans, College of the Desert, Community Action, Tompkins County, Hanson McClain, Olmsted County, Old Line Bank, Steinhafels, CIRCOR Pibiviesse
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, IBM and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: October 2024.
813,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.