Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Laserfiche vs OpenText Documentum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Laserfiche
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
22nd
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Document Management Software (13th)
OpenText Documentum
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Laserfiche is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Documentum is 11.8%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

CB
Jul 31, 2019
A powerful solution that offers BPM and automation to assist with our digital transformation
We use this solution for DMS, ECM, scan and imaging, plus workflows and forms solutions spread over the entire company This is a very complete and powerful solution. No code: We can address all of the features and functionalities with computer-minded people without having to call the IT Dept or…
Kabir Jakkamsetti - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 20, 2023
Can be used to automate the storage of metadata and content, but it add some AI integrations
I'm a developer, so I use OpenText Documentum to customize the user interface and the back end. We use OpenText Documentum to automate the storage of metadata and content Before OpenText Documentum, many manual processes were implemented in our organization. Using OpenText Documentum, we've been…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This is a very complete and powerful solution."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"The most impactful thing is the size, which is almost 25 TB."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"It has the ability to categorize and search."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"It is quite good."
 

Cons

"We would like to see more features for RPA and AI."
"The licensing model should be changed."
"We mostly use the Life Sciences package. That package is somewhat dated. There should be enhancements to the Life Science package and additional offerings to support pharma in particular."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"It can be somewhat cumbersome for the operations team since it’s not a cloud instance"
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
"They should develop something so that bugs don't happen in our project. We make changes manually and some bugs happen."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price is considered affordable now."
"The product is expensive."
"It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of great or bad."
"OpenText Documentum has announced a new licensing model, which could be more expensive."
"It is quite an expensive product."
"OpenText Documentum's pricing is good."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
38%
Government
14%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Documentum?
It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of great or bad.
What do you like most about OpenText Documentum?
The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role.
What needs improvement with OpenText Documentum?
The main thing is the cost. Most of the time, organizations move away from Documentum due to cost. It's highly-priced, and the support costs are high. Now, SharePoint and other options. Microsoft g...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Dell EMC Documentum, Documentum , Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

D.L. Evans, College of the Desert, Community Action, Tompkins County, Hanson McClain, Olmsted County, Old Line Bank, Steinhafels, CIRCOR Pibiviesse
Agility; Bibliotheca Alexandrina; Capitec Bank; Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa; County of Los Angeles, Department of Human Resources; Fresenius Kabi; Heathrow Airport; Lahey Health; Linde PLC; Milestone Pharma Co. Ltd; National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; Open Grid Europe GmbH; REPCO NEX Industrial Solutions; Springer Nature; Syngene International; Tata Power DDL; University of Texas Austin
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, IBM and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.