Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM FileNet vs Nuxeo comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM FileNet
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
100
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nuxeo
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
20th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Digital Asset Management (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of IBM FileNet is 10.4%, up from 9.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nuxeo is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

Emad Rizki - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates seamless integration for large enterprises with strong deployment capabilities
FileNet was scalable and could be implemented into big multinational organizations. However, it has become very expensive recently. Compared to low-code solutions such as Appian and outsystems, FileNet has gaps, mainly because it requires coding, which is not preferred by clients due to pricing concerns in Pakistan. We transitioned clients to cloud solutions, although FileNet has been strongly integrated with on-prem deployments.
it_user589377 - PeerSpot reviewer
A content management engine for information sharing, automation, and workflows.
The killing feature is a one month free trial. The content management engine is powerful. Just download, install, and go! The tricky part is active directory synchronization, but it is not so difficult to configure. It is a very good product. Configuration and tweaking is very easy with Nuxeo Studio: * Nuxeo Studio is a full graphical configuration tool, well documented and very easy to implement, test, and tweak. * Nuxeo Studio can be used with a one month free trial (which I did). * Nuxeo content management engine is powerful and can be adjusted to any need (user interface, document types, automations, workflows).
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
10%
Insurance Company
9%
Computer Software Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Government
10%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM FileNet?
The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FileNet?
It depends on the business partner providing the solution to the customer. We have an ESA contract with IBM which allows us to offer the solution at a competitive price, providing added value when ...
What needs improvement with IBM FileNet?
The setup process is very complex, and I would prefer if it were easier. A modern interface would also be an enhancement.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
Electronic Arts, Jeppesen, U.S. Navy, Orange, GSD&M, Sirona Dental, Skyscanner, Verizon, Unizin, Enernoc, NHS
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, IBM and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: January 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.