Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM FileNet vs Nuxeo comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM FileNet
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
99
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nuxeo
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
20th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Digital Asset Management (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of IBM FileNet is 10.1%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nuxeo is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

WolfgangPichler - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a compact solution for midsized companies
IBM does not do very good marketing for FileNet. Initially, after IBM acquired the product, there was good marketing support, but this has dwindled as IBM has lost personnel. More could be done to highlight the benefits to customers. Additionally, there are no visually appealing interfaces or apps for the product, which can influence customer buying decisions.
it_user589377 - PeerSpot reviewer
A content management engine for information sharing, automation, and workflows.
The killing feature is a one month free trial. The content management engine is powerful. Just download, install, and go! The tricky part is active directory synchronization, but it is not so difficult to configure. It is a very good product. Configuration and tweaking is very easy with Nuxeo Studio: * Nuxeo Studio is a full graphical configuration tool, well documented and very easy to implement, test, and tweak. * Nuxeo Studio can be used with a one month free trial (which I did). * Nuxeo content management engine is powerful and can be adjusted to any need (user interface, document types, automations, workflows).
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Government
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Insurance Company
9%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Government
14%
Insurance Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM FileNet?
The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FileNet?
It depends on the business partner providing the solution to the customer. We have an ESA contract with IBM which allows us to offer the solution at a competitive price, providing added value when ...
What needs improvement with IBM FileNet?
The setup process is very complex, and I would prefer if it were easier. A modern interface would also be an enhancement.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
Electronic Arts, Jeppesen, U.S. Navy, Orange, GSD&M, Sirona Dental, Skyscanner, Verizon, Unizin, Enernoc, NHS
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, IBM and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.