IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

IBM and Salesforce are both solutions in the Data Integration category. IBM is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0, while Salesforce is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 0.9% mindshare in DI, compared to Salesforce’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

IBM InfoSphere Information ...

Read 7 IBM InfoSphere Information Server reviews

1,082 Views
885 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 6 MuleSoft Composer reviews

309 Views
241 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM InfoSphere Information ...

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM InfoSphere Information Server and MuleSoft Composer are both key players in data integration and synchronization. MuleSoft Composer is favored for its ease of use and seamless integration capabilities, standing out against IBM InfoSphere's strong data governance features.

Features: IBM InfoSphere Information Server is known for comprehensive data governance tools, robust data quality management, and support for large-scale enterprises. MuleSoft Composer offers intuitive integration features, rapid deployment capabilities, and automation tools for various systems.

Room for Improvement: IBM InfoSphere could benefit from a simplified deployment process, better integration flexibility, and an enhanced user interface. MuleSoft Composer may need improvements in data governance features, technical depth for complex integrations, and stronger customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Composer provides a cloud-based deployment model and excellent customer support, ensuring quick setup and troubleshooting. IBM InfoSphere's complex deployment process often involves on-premise installations, which can lead to extended project timelines, although it offers strong technical support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM InfoSphere typically has higher initial costs due to infrastructure requirements but offers solid ROI for enterprises needing advanced governance. MuleSoft Composer provides a more affordable entry point with subscription pricing, delivering rapid ROI through efficient integration.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. MuleSoft Composer

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Information ...

Ranking in Data Integration

31st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Metadata Management (7th)

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Data Integration

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (13th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Information Server is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

UmeshKumar1

Business Analyst Team Lead at Accenture

Prompt support, reliable, but lacking scalability

IBM InfoSphere Information Server has multiple tools in that product suite. However, we mainly use it as an integration tool I have been using IBM InfoSphere Information Server for approximately five years. IBM InfoSphere Information Server is stable. IBM InfoSphere Information Server should be…

Read full review

Prince Barai

Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.

The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved

Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The integration with different technologies is the most valuable feature."

"IBM InfoSphere Information Server is stable."

"This solution is extremely flexible and scalable."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

Cons

"There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required."

"This solution would benefit from the engine being made more lightweight."

"IBM InfoSphere Information Server should be more scalable. It should have the option to change the configuration to run on a single, non-multiple node, or multi-threading processing."

"Their technical support needs improvement."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost of IBM InfoSphere Information Server depends on how many users there are."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Government

14%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM InfoSphere Information Server?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere Information Server?

There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required. In our company, we are presently in the process of doing a PoC phase since we have the solution cu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM InfoSphere Information Server?

I use IBM InfoSphere Information Server in retail banking for transformation purposes.

See all answers

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Compared 65% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Compared 15% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Compared 12% of the time

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM InfoSphere Information Server Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 40% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 14% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 13% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 10% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2025

IBM InfoSphere Information Server report

Download IBM InfoSphere Information Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

March 2025

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

InfoSphere Information Server, IBM Information Server

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Overview

IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a market-leading data integration platform which includes a family of products that enable you to understand, cleanse, monitor, transform, and deliver data, as well as to collaborate to bridge the gap between business and IT. InfoSphere Information Server provides massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities to deliver a highly scalable and flexible integration platform that handles a variety of data volumes (big, small, and everything in between).

IBM

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Canadian National Railway Company, Chickasaw Nation Division of Commerce, Swedish Armed Forces, BG RCI, Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., University of Arizona, Biogrid Australia

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. MuleSoft Composer

April 2025

Free Report: IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.