Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Resilient vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) comparison

IBM and ThreatConnect are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. IBM is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.5, while ThreatConnect is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 2.1% mindshare in SOAR, compared to ThreatConnect’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ThreatConnect users who would recommend it.
IBM Resilient
Read 18 IBM Resilient reviews
  • 1,350 Views
  • 820 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
ThreatConnect Threat Intell...
Read 6 ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) reviews
  • 853 Views
  • 641 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform and IBM Resilient compete in the threat intelligence and incident response fields. IBM Resilient has an edge in customer satisfaction with features, whereas ThreatConnect is preferred for pricing and support.

Features: ThreatConnect offers comprehensive capabilities like threat intelligence, advanced threat analysis, and automation features valuable for security operations. IBM Resilient focuses on incident response and management with robust orchestration tools and integration capabilities, enhancing operational efficiency. ThreatConnect is centered on threat analysis, while IBM Resilient excels in response management.

Room for Improvement: ThreatConnect could improve by enhancing its integration with third-party tools, broadening automation capabilities, and offering more detailed analytics reporting. IBM Resilient may benefit from simplifying its interface, reducing the learning curve through additional training resources, and offering more flexible deployment options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThreatConnect provides a straightforward deployment model with strong customer support for easy integration. IBM Resilient offers extensive deployment options but requires more customization, leading to a steeper learning curve. However, it offers responsive customer service for support.

Pricing and ROI: ThreatConnect is praised for cost-effectiveness and strong ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. IBM Resilient, perceived as costlier, provides higher ROI with a comprehensive feature set, leading to greater long-term benefits despite higher initial costs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 844,944 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Resilient
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
13th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Security Incident Response (3rd)
ThreatConnect Threat Intell...
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
17th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of IBM Resilient is 2.1%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 

Featured Reviews

Usman Bhatti - PeerSpot reviewer
Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility
Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution. It's worth noting that many third-party add-on applications needed to be purchased separately to integrate with IBM Resilient. While there were built-in applications available for incident remediation, the selection was limited. Additionally, integrating third-party applications was often a difficult and time-consuming process due to the technical complexity involved.
Read full review
Aadarsh Dawn - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers features like response capabilities and automation response and automation orchestration
ThreatConnect aggregates and operationalizes Threat intelligence data and sources across internal client environments. It leverages Automation and built in Case Management to streamline and automate threat intelligence-driven processes and investigations within client environments ThreatConnect…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is easy to use."
"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."
"What I like most about IBM Resilient is that it has a complete stack, which means you don't need to use different OEM products because you have all you need under the IBM Resilient umbrella. You don't need to worry much about integrations and components because you're working with tested and proven architecture."
"As a whole, the product is stable...Technical support is very good."
"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution is reliable in our usage."
"The most valuable features of IBM Resilient are its flexibility and customization options for incident response."
More IBM Resilient pros
"I like their customer support."
"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it."
"The tool's installation, integration, and playbooks are very straightforward."
"We have been able to see a return on investment as our clients believe in us more."
"ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."
"It's a solid platform and is stable enough. It is not complicated and is easy to use."
"The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP."
 

Cons

"The product must provide more integration with other tools."
"This product could be improved with better customization. This product isn't the best on the market like QRadar, but it's actually a good solution. However, some competitors' solutions contain more integration, support, automation, or flexibility."
"Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The ability to analyze incidents needs to be improved in the solution."
"IBM Resilient is quite complex, including its configuration."
"The response time of the support is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There are shortcomings with IBM Resilient's technical support team that can be considered for improvement in the future."
More IBM Resilient cons
"I couldn’t get any training videos online when I was working with the tool."
"It would be good to have more feeds and more integrated sources for enrichment."
"Integration is an area that could use some improvement."
"Sometimes, when using the solution, it slows down, affecting our ability to mitigate threats."
"I would like to see improvements in the time zone support of their customer service, considering users are from different time zones."
"Support is an area with which nobody is ever fully satisfied, so it can be improved."
"They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We could create unlimited users using the license we had purchased."
"It is very expensive."
"The cost of the product is quite high."
"The licensing cost for IBM Resilient is not too expensive, but it's not affordable, so it's moderately expensive. Regarding price, I'm rating the solution seven out of ten. The company pays for the license yearly, based on the number of users. Apart from the cost of the license you need to pay for each user, you also need to spend an initial investment for the base platform. You also have to pay for IBM Resilient support."
"I feel it is an expensive product when my company pays annually for renewal, support, and follow-up."
"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. The tool’s pricing is on a yearly basis."
"There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."
"Pricing for the solution is good, in my opinion."
More IBM Resilient pricing and cost advice
"I rate the product price as six on a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten means it is cheap."
"The price of this product is in the mid-range, not too expensive, nor inexpensive."
"The tool is expensive."
"The price could be better."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Resilient?
It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Resilient?
I am not the one in charge of pricing, so I am not sure about the costs.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Resilient?
Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations.
See all answers
What do you like most about ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
The pricing seems a bit high for smaller companies. It would be beneficial if they had pricing tailored to different client sizes.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?
I would like to see improvements in the time zone support of their customer service, considering users are from different time zones. Additionally, the pricing is high for smaller organizations, so...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs IBM Resilient Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs IBM Resilient
Compared 39% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs IBM Resilient Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs IBM Resilient
Compared 22% of the time
Splunk SOAR vs IBM Resilient Logo
Splunk SOAR vs IBM Resilient
Compared 18% of the time
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs IBM Resilient Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs IBM Resilient
Compared 11% of the time
ServiceNow Security Operations vs IBM Resilient Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations vs IBM Resilient
Compared 11% of the time
More IBM Resilient Competitors
Recorded Future vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Logo
Recorded Future vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
Compared 26% of the time
Anomali vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Logo
Anomali vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
Compared 23% of the time
ThreatQ vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Logo
ThreatQ vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
Compared 17% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
Compared 12% of the time
Cyware Cyber Fusion vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Logo
Cyware Cyber Fusion vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
Compared 8% of the time
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM Resilient
March 2025
IBM Resilient reportDownload IBM Resilient product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
March 2025
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) reportDownload ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) product report
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
IBM
ThreatConnect
 

Overview

The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

IBM

The ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations (TIOps) Platform lets organizations operationalize and evolve their cyber threat intel program, enabling cybersecurity operations teams to measurably improve their organization’s resilience to attacks. The TIOps Platform enhances collaboration across teams to drive proactive threat defense, and improve threat detection and response. The AI- and automation-powered TI Ops Platform enables analysts to perform all their work effectively and efficiently in a single, unified platform, allowing threat intel to be aggregated, analyzed, prioritized, and actioned against the most relevant threats. 

ThreatConnect
 

Sample Customers

Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
Oracle, IBM, General Dynamics, Scotiabank, Sony, Athena Health, Berkshire Hathaway Energy, Workday, TikTok
Buyer's Guide
IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
March 2025
Free Report: IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) report.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.