IBM Resilient vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) comparison

IBM and ThreatConnect are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.5, while ThreatConnect is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5. IBM holds a 2.7% mindshare in SOAR, compared to ThreatConnect’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ThreatConnect users who would recommend it.

IBM Resilient

Read 18 IBM Resilient reviews

1,517 Views
937 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

ThreatConnect Threat Intell...

Read 5 ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) reviews

954 Views
729 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Resilient

ThreatConnect Threat Intell...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform and IBM Resilient compete in the threat intelligence and incident response fields. IBM Resilient has an edge in customer satisfaction with features, whereas ThreatConnect is preferred for pricing and support.

Features: ThreatConnect offers comprehensive capabilities like threat intelligence, advanced threat analysis, and automation features valuable for security operations. IBM Resilient focuses on incident response and management with robust orchestration tools and integration capabilities, enhancing operational efficiency. ThreatConnect is centered on threat analysis, while IBM Resilient excels in response management.

Room for Improvement: ThreatConnect could improve by enhancing its integration with third-party tools, broadening automation capabilities, and offering more detailed analytics reporting. IBM Resilient may benefit from simplifying its interface, reducing the learning curve through additional training resources, and offering more flexible deployment options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThreatConnect provides a straightforward deployment model with strong customer support for easy integration. IBM Resilient offers extensive deployment options but requires more customization, leading to a steeper learning curve. However, it offers responsive customer service for support.

Pricing and ROI: ThreatConnect is praised for cost-effectiveness and strong ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. IBM Resilient, perceived as costlier, provides higher ROI with a comprehensive feature set, leading to greater long-term benefits despite higher initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 830,726 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Resilient

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

8th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Incident Response (3rd)

ThreatConnect Threat Intell...

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of IBM Resilient is 2.7%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is 2.0%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Usman Bhatti

Senior Officer Security Operations Center at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Simple deployment, scalable, but lacking third-party solution compatibility

Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution. It's worth noting that many third-party add-on applications needed to be purchased separately to integrate with IBM Resilient. While there were built-in applications available for incident remediation, the selection was limited. Additionally, integrating third-party applications was often a difficult and time-consuming process due to the technical complexity involved.

Read full review

Aadarsh Dawn

Manager, Product & Channel Development at Spire Solutions

Offers features like response capabilities and automation response and automation orchestration

ThreatConnect aggregates and operationalizes Threat intelligence data and sources across internal client environments. It leverages Automation and built in Case Management to streamline and automate threat intelligence-driven processes and investigations within client environments ThreatConnect…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good."

"The product is very good at incident response."

"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"Its flexibility is the most valuable."

"As a whole, the product is stable...Technical support is very good."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The most valuable thing about it is how easy it is to navigate the user interface."

More IBM Resilient pros

"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it."

"The tool's installation, integration, and playbooks are very straightforward."

"It's a solid platform and is stable enough. It is not complicated and is easy to use."

"The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP."

"ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."

Cons

"The product must provide more integration with other tools."

"The ability to analyze incidents needs to be improved in the solution."

"The implementation could be a bit simpler."

"The response time of the support is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Integrating IBM Resilient with other applications can be very difficult and technically challenging. Often, they use the excuse that you are using the latest version of an application, such as an endpoint security system, and they don't have an API or support for it at the moment. There is no automation in the SOAR solution."

"This product could be improved with better customization. This product isn't the best on the market like QRadar, but it's actually a good solution. However, some competitors' solutions contain more integration, support, automation, or flexibility."

"IBM Resilient could integrate better with my tools."

"The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions."

More IBM Resilient cons

"Integration is an area that could use some improvement."

"They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"

"Support is an area with which nobody is ever fully satisfied, so it can be improved."

"I couldn’t get any training videos online when I was working with the tool."

"It would be good to have more feeds and more integrated sources for enrichment."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I feel it is an expensive product when my company pays annually for renewal, support, and follow-up."

"We could create unlimited users using the license we had purchased."

"The cost of the product is quite high."

"Pricing for the solution is good, in my opinion."

"The licensing cost for IBM Resilient is not too expensive, but it's not affordable, so it's moderately expensive. Regarding price, I'm rating the solution seven out of ten. The company pays for the license yearly, based on the number of users. Apart from the cost of the license you need to pay for each user, you also need to spend an initial investment for the base platform. You also have to pay for IBM Resilient support."

"It is very expensive."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. The tool’s pricing is on a yearly basis."

"There are no costs except for the support services that our company pays in addition to the licensing charges attached to the solution."

More IBM Resilient pricing and cost advice

"The price of this product is in the mid-range, not too expensive, nor inexpensive."

"I rate the product price as six on a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten means it is cheap."

"The price could be better."

"The tool is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Resilient?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Resilient?

I am not the one in charge of pricing, so I am not sure about the costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Resilient?

Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations.

See all answers

What do you like most about ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?

The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?

The tool's prices are at par when compared to the other products in the market, so it is not uber-premium or too pricey. I rate the product price as six on a scale of one to ten, where one is extre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)?

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) needs to develop its SOAR platform because it currently doesn't position or connect itself as a SOAR tool, even though it has at least 60 percent of...

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 38% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs IBM Resilient

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 17% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs IBM Resilient

Compared 17% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Resilient Competitors

Anomali vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

Compared 26% of the time

Recorded Future vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

Compared 22% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

Compared 13% of the time

ThreatQ vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

Compared 13% of the time

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

Compared 7% of the time

More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Resilient

January 2025

Download IBM Resilient product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms

January 2025

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) report

Download ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) product report

Learn More

Video not available

IBM

Video not available

ThreatConnect

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

IBM

ThreatConnect

Overview

The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

The ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Operations (TIOps) Platform lets organizations operationalize and evolve their cyber threat intel program, enabling cybersecurity operations teams to measurably improve their organization’s resilience to attacks. The TIOps Platform enhances collaboration across teams to drive proactive threat defense, and improve threat detection and response. The AI- and automation-powered TI Ops Platform enables analysts to perform all their work effectively and efficiently in a single, unified platform, allowing threat intel to be aggregated, analyzed, prioritized, and actioned against the most relevant threats.

Sample Customers

Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds

Oracle, IBM, General Dynamics, Scotiabank, Sony, Athena Health, Berkshire Hathaway Energy, Workday, TikTok

Buyer's Guide

IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

December 2024

Free Report: IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

830,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Resilient vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.