ITRS Geneos vs Sentry comparison

ITRS and Sentry are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. ITRS is ranked #34 with an average rating of 5.0, while Sentry is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. ITRS holds a 1.3% mindshare in APM, compared to Sentry’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sentry users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

4,225 Views
3,211 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Sentry

Read 13 Sentry reviews

9,988 Views
9,688 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Sentry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

ITRS Geneos and Sentry compete in the monitoring solutions category. Sentry seems to have the upper hand due to its targeted capabilities and cost-effectiveness.

Features: ITRS Geneos is praised for its comprehensive monitoring, alerting capabilities, and robust functionality. Sentry is favored for effective error tracking, performance monitoring, and targeted developer solutions.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos users highlight the need for simpler configuration, better documentation, and improved usability. Sentry users desire improved integration capabilities, more robust support channels, and better customer service response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos is reported to have a more complex deployment process, requiring extensive support, but offers superior customer service once the system is running. Sentry is seen as easier to deploy, although it has feedback suggesting room for improvement in customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos has a higher initial setup cost, but users feel they get good value with a solid ROI due to its robust functionality. Sentry's pricing is more favorable, and users find the ROI excellent due to its cost-effectiveness and error tracking efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Sentry Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Sentry

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

34th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (69th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (48th)

Sentry

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sentry is 6.9%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Abdullah Baig

Software Dev at AF AB

An easy-to-use solution that has a good dashboard, performs well, and provides flexible pricing

Sentry was easy to learn compared to New Relic and Azure Monitor. I saw some valuable input. It took us the least amount of time to see how Sentry is valuable. It took just a few minutes. Session Replay provides a replay of the recorded errors. It is a good feature. Azure Monitor does not have this feature. The error reporting is straightforward. We can see everything that we need to see. The dashboard seems pretty fine. The product performs well. We can see the user's IP addresses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Custom script toolkits"

"One thing we're utilizing in Geneos is the Gateway-SQL. That's really helpful for us. Using Gateway-SQL, we are able to merge two different views into one. Suppose we have to check something in the log and that we have to check something in the database and do a comparison before publishing a result. We can achieve that using Gateway-SQL."

"Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue."

"Tons of default modules which are available out of the box"

"The ability to completely tailor and customize what it's monitoring is one of its strongest points. A lot of other monitoring tools are good at certain things, but one of my colleagues described it as the “Swiss Army Knife” of monitoring tools. It can do anything you want."

"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."

"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."

"This solution has helped provide relief to existing Level 2 teams, allowing them to focus efforts on in-depth problem analysis."

More ITRS Geneos pros

"Sentry is more accurate than some other tools such as Datadog because it has more integration with Slack, GitLab, Jira, or other ticketing tools."

"Overall, I give Sentry a rating of 10."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create and assign rules and give access to particular users."

"I would rate the stability of Sentry as eight out of ten."

"Sentry breaks everything down in real time."

"The stability is very good for Sentry and in general works well."

"The product performs well."

"The most valuable feature we have found with Sentry is the security that it provides."

More Sentry pros

Cons

"Geneos' application monitoring could be improved a lot. Products like AppDynamics and Dynatrace provide the process thread-level monitoring, but Geneos lacks these capabilities."

"The ITA, the post-incident analytics, could be improved."

"Currently, it is difficult to monitor secure websites using SSL or with SSO enabled."

"There is a part of the rules for monitoring alerts. I want to understand more about how to choose the samples and the requirements for the rules. That is the part that I want to understand better and get better training for."

"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."

"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."

"The deployment method for upgrading is a bit tricky. It takes a little bit of manual effort. If that could be a bit more automated, it would help us a lot."

"ITRS Geneos is not on the cloud at a time when everyone is moving to the cloud."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"I would like to have alert policies and alert conditions enhanced in the next release."

"The price could be lowered."

"It should be easier to integrate Sentry with other tools, and the end-to-end tracing capabilities could be improved."

"The settings for an administrator are complex."

"To deal with its shortcomings, Sentry needs to continuously improve in areas like the user interface and documentation, apart from its other features."

"We cannot restrict particular columns on particular data. It would be helpful if that feature was improved."

"Its debugging feature needs to be faster."

"I would like to see a role registration feature added."

More Sentry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"I am currently using a self-hosted open version."

"We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."

"Currently, we are in the production phase of our project and we are on free plans to use Sentry. Once we go live we will have to be on a subscription-based plan."

"We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

73%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sentry?

The product performs well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sentry?

Sentry is very affordable. We spend less than $200 to $300 a month. Compared to New Relic, it provides the necessary features at a cheaper cost, especially since we moved infrastructure monitoring ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sentry?

Right now, Sentry meets our needs and we have not encountered any bottlenecks. However, additional personalization and easier setup for capturing all the different application logs could be an area...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 15% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Grafana vs Sentry

Compared 21% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Sentry

Compared 12% of the time

OpenTelemetry vs Sentry

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Sentry

Compared 10% of the time

Dynatrace vs Sentry

Compared 8% of the time

More Sentry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

July 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

July 2025

Download Sentry product report

Also Known As

Geneos

No data available

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sentry is a tool for monitoring web and application performance, tracking errors, processing request times, and managing user data access.

Developers integrate Sentry with web and application environments to capture front-end and back-end errors, utilize error logs, trace requests, and observe metrics without real-time production access. Sentry's use extends to monitoring internal applications, leveraging CyberArk PAM integration, deploying notifications, and detecting silent failures. Users benefit from detailed error and performance reports, contextual cause-stack information, and real-time breakdowns. There is room for improvement, as users desire refined integration and administrative settings, enhanced alert policies, and more customization in event metrics.

What are Sentry's most important features?

Integration with Slack, GitLab, Jira for smoother workflow
Detailed error and performance reports for clearer insights
AWS Lambda compatibility for cloud functions
Contextual cause-stack information helps pinpoint issues
Real-time breakdowns for immediate data
Session Replay for reviewing user sessions

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating Sentry?

Efficient error tracking and monitoring improves application stability
Integration with major tools enhances team collaboration
User-friendly interfaces deliver a smooth learning curve
Security features provide peace of mind
ETL pipeline orchestration streamlines data handling

Sentry is implemented across industries ranging from tech startups to large enterprises. These organizations use Sentry to enhance application reliability, track performance, and secure user data within protected environments. Integration with CyberArk PAM ensures secure deployment. Organizations find Sentry useful for monitoring internal applications, efficiently processing request times, and tracing changes in production without direct access.

Sentry

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. Sentry

July 2025

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. Sentry

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. Sentry report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.