JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics GP comparison

Oracle and Microsoft are both solutions in the ERP category. Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4, while Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.1. Oracle holds a 3.1% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Read 60 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne reviews

3,035 Views
2,485 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 23 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

923 Views
703 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics GP and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are ERP solutions competing in enterprise resource planning. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne exhibits strong integration features, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is preferred for its smoother adaptation, giving it an advantage in customization.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics GP is strong in financial management, human resources, payables management, and workflow automation. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers advanced analytics, tailored industry solutions, and robust integration across business processes, supporting larger enterprises with complex demands.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics GP could enhance scalability and expand industry-specific solutions to compete better with larger ERP systems. It also needs more comprehensive customer service for broader geographic regions. JD Edwards might improve by simplifying its initial setup and offering lower deployment costs. Enhancements in user-friendly interfaces can also benefit its adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports hybrid deployment models like on-premises and cloud, offering stellar customer service. Microsoft Dynamics GP, generally localized, allows quicker initial deployments due to simplicity but provides less global customer service coverage compared to JD Edwards.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics GP often provides a lower initial setup cost, attractive to businesses with budget limits. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, while having higher upfront costs, potentially delivers higher ROI via functionality and scalability. The choice is influenced by immediate versus long-term company budget strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Ranking in ERP

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (5th), Production Planning (1st), Demand Management (1st)

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 3.1%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP

Featured Reviews

Suresh Wickramasinghe

Finance Senior Executive at IFS North America

Simplifies finance processes and is easy to use but requires a user-friendly interface

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a user-friendly ERP solution that is quite simple. It has a very straightforward interface, which allows end users, especially those with a finance background like me, to engage in finance areas such as vouchers, manual vouchers, email receipts, and GL analysis efficiently. This ERP system is easy to handle; anyone can learn it faster compared to other ERPs. For smaller companies or startups, I would recommend JD Edwards.

Read full review

Firaz Mohammed

Information Technology Manager at a retailer with 51-200 employees

Offers great integration capabilities and allows just the real-time inventory

Dynamics GP improves inventory management by offering real-time inventory tracking, and automated purchase order creation, receiving, and updating inventory levels. It facilitates site-to-site transfers and allocation tracking, enabling efficient stock management across locations. The integration capability of Dynamics GP, combined with Power Platform, has transformed our business processes. We now use PowerApps to enable salesmen to send orders electronically, eliminating the need for order books. Additionally, we developed HR apps to streamline tasks for our staff, leading to automated processes and improved efficiency. Our experience with Dynamics GP reporting and analytics features, particularly Advanced Analysis, has been great. We utilize customized smart lists for purchasing and other functions, allowing for tailored insights over specific periods. Additionally, we have developed custom dashboards for enhanced visibility and support portal integration. I wouldn't recommend Dynamics GP due to its legacy status and impending end of support. However, if integration with the Power Platform is crucial and the company prioritizes modernization, it could still be a viable option. For new companies, I would suggest considering Dynamics 365 Business Central for a more modern solution. Overall, I would rate Dynamics GP as a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."

"The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."

"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."

"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."

"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."

"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."

"The solution excels in costing and work order processing. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne manages multiple manufacturing modes in the same process effectively."

"The financial management features are convenient and helpful in JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations."

"Snowflake's ability to handle large queries efficiently is very beneficial, unlike other databases which can take a significant amount of time for similar tasks."

"We have gained the capability to control and address various issues within the financial module effectively."

"Snowflake's ability to handle large queries efficiently is very beneficial, unlike other databases which can take a significant amount of time for similar tasks."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is financial control. The accounting aspect allows us to manage our clients and payments."

"The system is easy to customize and has user-friendly access. "

"The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

Cons

"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."

"Implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne can have its challenges. For example, we faced issues like timeout exceptions in a recent integration project while pulling data from third-party systems."

"Localization features are critical for all regions. Improving these features in various countries and markets is essential to meet customer needs."

"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."

"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."

"The implementation procedure could be simplified."

"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."

"There is room for improvement on the payroll side, as the solution is not very strong in this area."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne cons

"As technology changes, I would say probably in the area of chart up account needs improvement because chart up account is a string. So if they make it more flexible."

"As for room for improvement, they have different modules, project and analytical accounting, but it will be good to have that kind of part in the standard package. To have that additional reporting functionality where you can add an attribute or something, which you can report again. So you can analyze the cost by not just natural accounts but also by a project, without having to go through another module edit on top and then the other module edit on top. The more modules you add, sometimes it doesn't work that well. Additionally, it would be easier to have the solution on the cloud. That's our consideration. We are trying to move all our systems to the cloud, and GP is one of them that we are going to move in the next couple of years. I would rate the solution seven or seven point five out of ten."

"The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved."

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning."

"The biggest problem with GP is that it's not cloud based and it doesn't lend itself to subscription licensing. But Microsoft wants everything in the cloud and licensed on a subscription basis.Even tThough GP can be deployed on a cloud server, but basically, it's a Windows based product. It uses the older model and companies purchase the program and pay a 16-18 sixteen- eighteen percent annual renewal fee but Microsoft wants everybody to pay monthly or annual renewal fees on a subscription basis."

"Initially, we encountered challenges, particularly with users transitioning from their previous applications."

"It requires a lot of expertise to implement."

"Many of our customers are migrating to the cloud rather than staying on-premises."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is really expensive."

"In terms of price, it is not on the high end."

"The maintenance of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is expensive and overall the solution is expensive. Most enterprise operation solution is expensive."

"The licensing costs are on a yearly basis, and there are no additional costs."

"The solution’s pricing depends on the module you’re purchasing."

"There is an annual license for this solution."

"The cost depends on the number of users and the modules required."

"More transparent pricing of the software is needed."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pricing and cost advice

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"The solution's price is steep."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"It is an affordable solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

The pricing is average. Over the years, it might increase a little. Generally, it offers a good price.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

Based on my experience, I would recommend JD Edwards EnterpriseOne to other people. Overall, I would rate the solution nine out of ten, as it can be customized to the company's needs while maintain...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Dynamics GP?

The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I wish Microsoft gets Dynamics GP to a cloud-based solution, but unfortunately Microsoft had announced the End of Life for Dynamics GP.

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 15% of the time

PeopleSoft vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 13% of the time

JD Edwards World vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 12% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 9% of the time

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Competitors

Odoo vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 26% of the time

Epicor ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 14% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 13% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

February 2025

Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

February 2025

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Also Known As

No data available

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

Overview

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) software solution developed by Oracle. It is designed to help organizations streamline and automate their business processes, including financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing operations. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, distribution, and services.

With JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, organizations can manage their financials, inventory, order management, procurement, and supply chain processes from a single, integrated platform. It also provides real-time visibility into business performance, enabling organizations to make informed decisions and respond quickly to changing market conditions.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Features

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Financial management: The solution provides tools for financial management, including general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, and fixed assets.

Supply chain management: Its tools for managing the supply chain include procurement, inventory management, and order management.

Manufacturing operations: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports manufacturing operations, including material requirements planning (MRP), capacity planning, and shop floor control.

Real-time visibility: With its real-time visibility into business performance, organizations can make more informed decisions.

Business intelligence: The solution offers business intelligence and reporting capabilities to help organizations gain insight into their operations and make data-driven decisions.

Workflow management: The solution’s workflow management enables organizations to automate and streamline business processes.

Mobile access: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne allows users to access information and perform tasks from anywhere, at any time via mobile access.

Security: It provides a secure platform for protecting sensitive data and ensuring the integrity of business operations.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Increased productivity: With its range of tools and features, the solution supports collaboration and communication, improving productivity and reducing the time required to complete tasks.

Improved business performance: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne helps organizations improve their overall business performance by providing real-time visibility into key performance metrics and enabling data-driven decision-making.

Customization: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries and organizations.

Integration: It integrates with other enterprise applications, including customer relationship management (CRM), human resources (HR), and e-commerce solutions.

Reviews from Real Users

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are its ability to model, ease of use, customization capabilities, and being able to create reports without coding.

According to PeerSpot user Raymond R., JD Edwards functional consultant manufacturer at Ordina, “The strongest functionality of JD Edwards is the ability to model, in the production that it is, model the production process. If I were to model the bill of materials and production routing, then that's one of the strongest parts of JD Edwards.”

Khalid J., Senior Manager - Group ICT at Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill Co. B. S. C., says, "We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."

In addition, a Project Leader at a tech services company expresses, "With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."

Oracle

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses. Dynamics GP helps you gain greater control over your financials, inventory, and operations. It’s easy to implement and use and empowers informed decisions that lead to business success.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

January 2025

Free Report: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Find out what your peers are saying about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.