Microsoft Dynamics GP vs SAP S/4HANA comparison

Microsoft and SAP are both solutions in the ERP category. Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.1, while SAP is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. Microsoft holds a 1.0% mindshare in ERP, compared to SAP’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 23 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

892 Views
654 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SAP S/4HANA

Read 119 SAP S/4HANA reviews

13,698 Views
9,441 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

SAP S/4HANA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics GP and SAP S/4HANA are competitors in the enterprise resource planning software market. SAP S/4HANA appears to have an advantage in scalability and performance, while Microsoft Dynamics GP is noted for affordability and ease of use.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics GP provides essential features such as strong accounting, financial management, and ease of customization. It is user-friendly, making it suitable for small to medium-sized businesses. SAP S/4HANA offers advanced functionalities like real-time data analytics, robust integration capabilities, and comprehensive financial reporting, catering to larger enterprises with complex operations.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics GP could enhance its scalability and introduce more advanced features to cater to larger businesses. It may also refine its integration capabilities with third-party tools. SAP S/4HANA may improve by lowering its implementation complexity and offering more budget-friendly options for smaller organizations. Improved user interface simplicity could further enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics GP offers straightforward deployment suitable for smaller organizations, with accessible customer service. SAP S/4HANA requires extensive deployment processes, ideal for larger businesses needing tailored solutions, with comprehensive support for complex issues.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics GP boasts a lower setup cost, attracting organizations seeking cost-effective solutions with quick ROI. SAP S/4HANA, despite a higher initial investment, promises substantial ROI through enhanced efficiency and scalability, making it suitable for enterprises eyeing long-term growth with advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP S/4HANA

Ranking in ERP

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

119

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S/4HANA is 12.9%, down from 16.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP

Featured Reviews

Firaz Mohammed

Information Technology Manager at a retailer with 51-200 employees

Offers great integration capabilities and allows just the real-time inventory

Dynamics GP improves inventory management by offering real-time inventory tracking, and automated purchase order creation, receiving, and updating inventory levels. It facilitates site-to-site transfers and allocation tracking, enabling efficient stock management across locations. The integration capability of Dynamics GP, combined with Power Platform, has transformed our business processes. We now use PowerApps to enable salesmen to send orders electronically, eliminating the need for order books. Additionally, we developed HR apps to streamline tasks for our staff, leading to automated processes and improved efficiency. Our experience with Dynamics GP reporting and analytics features, particularly Advanced Analysis, has been great. We utilize customized smart lists for purchasing and other functions, allowing for tailored insights over specific periods. Additionally, we have developed custom dashboards for enhanced visibility and support portal integration. I wouldn't recommend Dynamics GP due to its legacy status and impending end of support. However, if integration with the Power Platform is crucial and the company prioritizes modernization, it could still be a viable option. For new companies, I would suggest considering Dynamics 365 Business Central for a more modern solution. Overall, I would rate Dynamics GP as a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Deepak Madhavan

Delivery Head- IT Shared Services at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Implementation simplifies ERP management with comprehensive data integration and visibility

A lot of people would say the pricing. SAP is seen as quite expensive even now. It doesn't work for smaller or medium optimizations. The licensing and pricing could be looked at. In Brownfield migration, the trade-off between greenfield and brownfield means you either keep it clean or match the business requirements. Sometimes, it's not possible to do both. While ValixAPI provides significant support in making those decisions and the SAP consultant is very useful, we are still dependent on past history and how it was originally set up. I wouldn't call that a real disadvantage, yet more accessible consulting would be beneficial. Incorporating all other cloud products, like APO or IPP, into the S/4 house might also help.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to use."

"We have gained the capability to control and address various issues within the financial module effectively."

"The solution is easy to use and not complicated. Also, it is easy to get trained on. Also, there is good information available on the web. The GP community is quite broad and there are many blogs online."

"It's enhanced by a subscription billing add-on, to efficiently automate billing and invoicing, particularly due to our substantial customer database."

"The system is easy to customize and has user-friendly access. "

"Snowflake's ability to handle large queries efficiently is very beneficial, unlike other databases which can take a significant amount of time for similar tasks."

"It is a tried and tested ERP system which if used correctly, is definitely a very good program for managing all aspects of a business from customer sales, and receivables management, to payable management and finance reporting. So, it's super critical for any mid-sized company."

"The solution offers integrations with other software as well. We have integration with Microsoft Office where we can do Word and Excel, etc."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

"SAP S/4HANA is an integrated application, which is its greatest strength."

"SAP has many functionalities and a high level of detail so that you can manage all processes in detail without any issues."

"The overall product rating is nine out of ten."

"I have no issues with the stability of the product, as everything seems to be fine."

"Overall product rating: ten out of ten."

"The system is good and not slow."

"This tool helps us to manage business in a faster and smarter way."

"The latest version from SAP is highly valued."

More SAP S/4HANA pros

Cons

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning."

"The biggest problem with GP is that it's not cloud based and it doesn't lend itself to subscription licensing. But Microsoft wants everything in the cloud and licensed on a subscription basis.Even tThough GP can be deployed on a cloud server, but basically, it's a Windows based product. It uses the older model and companies purchase the program and pay a 16-18 sixteen- eighteen percent annual renewal fee but Microsoft wants everybody to pay monthly or annual renewal fees on a subscription basis."

"As for room for improvement, they have different modules, project and analytical accounting, but it will be good to have that kind of part in the standard package. To have that additional reporting functionality where you can add an attribute or something, which you can report again. So you can analyze the cost by not just natural accounts but also by a project, without having to go through another module edit on top and then the other module edit on top. The more modules you add, sometimes it doesn't work that well. Additionally, it would be easier to have the solution on the cloud. That's our consideration. We are trying to move all our systems to the cloud, and GP is one of them that we are going to move in the next couple of years. I would rate the solution seven or seven point five out of ten."

"It still can be improved in web-based and build reporting. "

"The issue we're encountering is that it's primarily designed for independent installations and not initially structured as a cloud-based solution, which has led to challenges with connectivity."

"It requires a lot of expertise to implement."

"At times, navigating the user console can be challenging, particularly when trying to find account information."

"As technology changes, I would say probably in the area of chart up account needs improvement because chart up account is a string. So if they make it more flexible."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

"This solution works with the configuration, if the prerequisites are very clear and can be configured it works perfectly. If you need to simulate something, as a predictive tool this kind of simulation is not very accurate and it has limitations. This is something that could improve."

"The Capex and Opex could be improved."

"Every time I connect, it's very slow."

"The cost of their support services could be more affordable."

"MRP repost area should be improved. The production information report also needs to be improved."

"We would like to see more DevOps capabilities in the future."

"When we want to raise a ticket on the SAP portal, the process takes a longer time, and there are many selections that confuse the user."

"SAP is seen as quite expensive even now. It doesn't work for smaller or medium optimizations."

More SAP S/4HANA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"It is an affordable solution."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"The solution's price is steep."

"Licensing costs are not transparent"

"The solution often does not survive our shortlist round because it is very expensive when compared to other products."

"The problem with SAP is that it offers two licenses, namely runtime license and enterprise license. If you have a runtime license, then you are doomed since you can't take any data out from the tool."

"There is a license required for the use of this solution and we are on a monthly subscription. The cost of the solution is expensive compared to other solutions."

"As for pricing, it depends on the business size and flow. If it's a medium-sized business, it might seem affordable, but for larger businesses with complex processes, it could be considered expensive."

"SAP S4HANA is expensive and for smaller businesses, it is very difficult for them to have the budget."

"We pay for an annual license."

"I feel that the product is a bit expensive."

More SAP S/4HANA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Government

Educational Organization

39%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Dynamics GP?

The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I wish Microsoft gets Dynamics GP to a cloud-based solution, but unfortunately Microsoft had announced the End of Life for Dynamics GP.

See all answers

Are there any advantages of SAP S4 HANA over SAP Business One (SAP B1) apart from the cost?

SaP Business One is a complete solution for business management. The software applications are broad, ranging from accounting to project management and human resources. It is very versatile and com...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA?

There could be a bit more competitiveness in their licensing and pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP S4HANA?

It is a great product to be implemented for different industries for my customers. Can it be used globally?

See all answers

Comparisons

Odoo vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 28% of the time

Epicor ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 15% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

SAP ERP vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 27% of the time

SAP Business One vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 8% of the time

Odoo vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 7% of the time

More SAP S/4HANA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

March 2025

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S/4HANA

March 2025

Download SAP S/4HANA product report

Also Known As

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

SAP S4HANA

Overview

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses. Dynamics GP helps you gain greater control over your financials, inventory, and operations. It’s easy to implement and use and empowers informed decisions that lead to business success.

Microsoft

SAP S4HANA is an ERP (enterprise resource planning) system that uses sophisticated technologies including machine learning and AI. It is most commonly used to integrate and manage business functions and is an ideal solution for large enterprises. The platform includes supplier relationship management (SRM), customer relationship management (CRM), supply chain management (SCM), and product lifecycle management (PLM) functionality.

SAP S4HANA offers three different deployment options:

On-premises
Cloud
Hybrid

SAP S4HANA Features

SAP S4HANA has many valuable key features, including:

Customizable
ERP, CRM, SRM, SCM, PLM co-deployed
High throughput
Fast analytics and reporting
Smaller total data footprint
SAP HANA multi-tenancy
All data: social, text, geo, graph, processing
New SAP Fiori UX for any device (mobile, desktop, tablet)
Unlimited workload capacity
High-volume transaction processing (OLTP)
High volume real-time analytical processes (OLAP)
Service Management
Digital Boardroom Integration

SAP S4HANA Benefits

Some of the benefits of using SAP S4HANA include:

Speed: S4 HANA applications leverage speed, context, and data accessibility to ensure you can stay up to date with rapidly evolving technology.

Improved performance: With SAP S4HANA, you can plan, execute, or generate reports and analytics based on live data to increase performance.

Simplicity: SAP S4HANA’s whole infrastructure was designed with simplification in mind — from the management of the solution to the administration of the IT landscape. The solution serves as the digital core for business process simplification and enables the centralizing of hardware and network resources.

Cost effective: SAP S4HANA is a cost effective solution. It provides the ability to bring together all the analytical and transactional capabilities of a variety of systems in one location, enabling better decision making.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by SAP S4HANA users.

A Mechanical Engineer at a construction company says, “It is a very powerful, highly customizable tool. The most valuable feature is that the reporting is fast. We can see the results from that in that our commissions come in fast. That is the main advantage.”

Another reviewer, a SAP Technology Manager at a financial services firm, mentions, "It is more or less a very, very smooth and seamless product. Day by day they are increasing their technology features and they are keen to resolve the issues. India has a complex business scenario and SAP is thinking about that and resolving the issues day by day. In terms of the features I have found most valuable, I don't think that there is any lack or any gap process-wise. SAP is a very good tool."

A Project and Service delivery Manager at a tech services company comments, "One of the most valuable features, which we used the most, was the FI module, for finance. It involved controlling, account receivables, account payables, and complete financial steering."

A Senior Architect at a construction company states, “The POD applications are very useful to us. There are a few POD apps which we are using for different business scenarios. They are quite interesting.” He also adds, “The initial setup is pretty straightforward. The documentation is very good. The solution can scale well. The solution is stable.”

SAP

Sample Customers

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Nestle, O.C. Tanner, Sabre, New York Life Insurance Co., MEMEBOX, Siemens AG.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA

March 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP S/4HANA report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.