Microsoft Dynamics GP vs SAP ERP comparison

Microsoft and SAP are both solutions in the ERP category. Microsoft is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.7, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.6. Microsoft holds a 1.4% mindshare in ERP, compared to SAP’s 9.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 25 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

1,880 Views
1,805 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SAP ERP

Read 108 SAP ERP reviews

12,562 Views
10,929 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

SAP ERP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SAP ERP and Microsoft Dynamics GP compete in the ERP solutions category. SAP ERP might have the upper hand due to its comprehensive integration appealing to large enterprises, while Microsoft Dynamics GP stands out for cost-effectiveness in mid-sized organizations.

Features: SAP ERP is tailored for medium to large companies with a comprehensive suite to manage finance, inventory, and production, offering customization for industry-specific needs. Its integration of operational modules increases efficiency and reduces redundancy. Microsoft Dynamics GP provides core financials and inventory management with easy customization, offering a simplified approach for mid-sized companies seeking cost-effective solutions.

Room for Improvement: SAP ERP's complexity and cost are significant drawbacks, with users noting poor user-friendliness and slow support responses. Microsoft Dynamics GP needs enhancements in cloud capabilities and modernization, experiencing challenges with prolonged usability and on-premises preference.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP ERP primarily supports on-premises deployments, with hybrid options suiting large, resource-intensive organizations. Its customer service varies, with some users reporting slow support. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers versatile deployment options, including hybrid cloud, making it accessible to various businesses. Microsoft provides reliable customer service, appreciated by users for its responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: SAP ERP is known for high initial and ongoing costs, often delaying ROI depending on company size and project scope. It justifies its price with extensive features. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers moderate pricing, making it an attractive option for mid-sized organizations. Users report positive ROI, praising its cost-effectiveness for businesses not requiring deep ERP functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP ERP Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP ERP

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,915 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP ERP

Ranking in ERP

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

108

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP ERP is 9.0%, down from 17.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP ERP	9.0%
Microsoft Dynamics GP	1.4%
Other	89.6%

ERP

Featured Reviews

reviewer2723988

Executive Director, Digital & Technology at a tech consulting company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration and flexibility deliver outstanding business experiences with innovative platforms enhancements

Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems. If they want to expand beyond mid-cap and enter the large-cap market, they need to consider balance and provide more customizability. This includes extending process flows through more APIs and building a more modular architecture with granular backend exposed via API. The process layer should allow clients to customize while invoking back-office APIs. The general perception positions Microsoft Dynamics GP in the middle of the market. Systems such as NetSuite and ServiceNow occupy the lower category, providing narrow use cases. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers more breadth and out-of-the-box capabilities at a slightly higher price point. At the top end, SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce offer extensive customizability at a premium price, suitable for large organizations with multiple transactions and customers. Microsoft Dynamics GP currently occupies a favorable position in the middle segment with limited competition.

Read full review

Achmad Dimyati

IT Service Management Team Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Long-term adaptation and evolution meets changing technology trends

SAP ERP is not really real-time. We use the HANA database which is supposed to be memory data in memory, but we are still not very happy. It is supposed to be real-time and come very quickly, but in reality, it still takes time to run. That is why we use BW of SAP, Business Objects, and now we have moved to the Analytic Cloud where we start using predictive AI. SAP recently implemented Databricks, and they started investing significantly in the analytic environment. SAP ERP has been left behind as they moved to S/4HANA with the HANA database. They restructured the whole table structure of SAP ERP, introduced simple finance, simple logistics, and moved HR to SuccessFactors. They have the BTP layer where they manage everything from integration to master data management. The challenge with SAP is that they move very fast to different products and buy different products. It requires significant investment and many skills to catch up because all of these have different sets of technology. The fundamental has changed differently. It is not monolithic anymore but different products under one name, SAP. You have to buy it model by model for additional models. Products such as SuccessFactors, Ariba for procure to pay, Concur for travel, and Facility Management use totally different technology. They try to integrate with each other, but it remains a challenge for SAP to make them have the same management, technology, and operational approach.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was very easy; you do not need a lot of technical in-depth knowledge to handle the implementation, and the stability is reliable."

"The most valuable feature is financial control. The accounting aspect allows us to manage our clients and payments."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations."

"I’ve implemented several hundred Microsoft Dynamics GP systems for many customers, and the improvements brought about in the client’s reporting and transaction functions are off the charts."

"The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable."

"I haven't used it a lot, but the best thing is that the processes are very detailed."

"The solution is easy to use and not complicated. Also, it is easy to get trained on. Also, there is good information available on the web. The GP community is quite broad and there are many blogs online."

"We have not encountered any noteworthy scalability issues; it’s a matter of increasing the power of the servers and hardware/software that it runs on."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

"From a long-term perspective, I can say that the solution can offer a return on investment, but it may take around three to four years for our company to experience it."

"The solution can easily be standardized across processes."

"SAP ERP is one of the best solutions."

"There are many interfaces, so you really can build satellites around it like with other SAP stuff or even third-party stuff."

"We used Navision previously and then we moved to SAP ERP because of its larger scale and strategic direction from the management."

"It is a stable solution."

"It has a lot of integrity of data, and it is fast; all the users feel that they can trust this data, so data integrity is the most important value of SAP."

"We are using it for all of our core business processes, including finance, sales and distribution, warehousing, and HR."

More SAP ERP pros

Cons

"Continuity between modules: Keystroke functionality is not consistent."

"As for room for improvement, they have different modules, project and analytical accounting, but it will be good to have that kind of part in the standard package. To have that additional reporting functionality where you can add an attribute or something, which you can report again. So you can analyze the cost by not just natural accounts but also by a project, without having to go through another module edit on top and then the other module edit on top. The more modules you add, sometimes it doesn't work that well. Additionally, it would be easier to have the solution on the cloud. That's our consideration. We are trying to move all our systems to the cloud, and GP is one of them that we are going to move in the next couple of years. I would rate the solution seven or seven point five out of ten."

"With payroll, the payroll that they have offers US or Canadian tax. However, here, our tax payments are different from the US and Canada. It is very difficult to put in our tax tables. We need some customization. It should be readily available for any country to use according to their tax implications. The system should know different types of tax regimes around the world so that it can accommodate. It's a little bit rigid on that."

"This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time."

"The issue we're encountering is that it's primarily designed for independent installations and not initially structured as a cloud-based solution, which has led to challenges with connectivity."

"The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved."

"The biggest problem with GP is that it's not cloud based and it doesn't lend itself to subscription licensing. But Microsoft wants everything in the cloud and licensed on a subscription basis.Even tThough GP can be deployed on a cloud server, but basically, it's a Windows based product. It uses the older model and companies purchase the program and pay a 16-18 sixteen- eighteen percent annual renewal fee but Microsoft wants everybody to pay monthly or annual renewal fees on a subscription basis."

"Initially, we encountered challenges, particularly with users transitioning from their previous applications."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

"It is on the expensive side."

"SAP is more expensive than some of its competitors."

"SAP ERP logged out in slightly less time than expected."

"I would like to see more integration with other partners. Some of our customers already use specific or in-house applications for their business processes. They do not want to replace those applications."

"We have never had a bad experience with this solution, except for how the system is over-customized."

"ERP could use better integration with other systems. That's always the thing."

"It could be more flexible, and the company should be able to adapt the system. Not the other way around. It's very rigid and difficult to change. Reporting could also be better."

"It's difficult to code, the structured language is difficult and could be improved."

More SAP ERP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"The solution's price is steep."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"It is an affordable solution."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"When you have a solution that is stable, reliable, and has a high performance as this solution, the price is going to be expensive. However, when you evaluate the service you are paying for the cost is quite reasonable for this solution."

"There are licensing costs."

"The on-premises licensing model comes with annual maintenance whereas the cloud-based licensing model is a yearly subscription. The tool’s pricing is normal and not expensive."

"There is a one-time license that is needed to use the solution. The support is what is needed to be renewed annually."

"I rate the product's price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap or affordable, and ten is really expensive. The solution is expensive."

"The price of SAP ERP is high, but it is worth the money. The maintenance and support can be expensive. There should be a different price model for businesses that are not as large to be able to afford it."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. SAP ERP is a costly tool."

"The solution can cost approximately $1 million a year for maintenance for a small-size company and can grow from there. Approximately $1 million is needed for a good-size company."

More SAP ERP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	31
Large Enterprise	78

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I have implemented Microsoft Dynamics GP in commercial and public sector organizations. In commercial pharma life sciences, Salesforce Veeva implementation supports commercial organizations doing p...

See all answers

Is Anaplan better than SAP ERP?

There are different aspects of both Anaplan and SAP ERP that I like and dislike. Anaplan improves forecast accuracy and drives up the quality of analytics. Rather than spending all of their time co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP ERP?

SAP ERP logged out in slightly less time than expected. Updates to the SAP UI would be useful.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP ERP?

I have been using SAP ERP for posting journal entries and analyzing the P&Ls and the financial close. By posting in FBL3N in SAP ERP, I can verify my journals and review how they were posted. I...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 17% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 14% of the time

Sage MAS vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 8% of the time

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

SAP S/4HANA vs SAP ERP

Compared 15% of the time

IFS Cloud Platform vs SAP ERP

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs SAP ERP

Compared 5% of the time

Infor M3 vs SAP ERP

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs SAP ERP

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP ERP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

April 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP ERP

April 2026

Download SAP ERP product report

Also Known As

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a comprehensive business management solution providing financial control, accounting features, and extensive reporting. It is built to support small to midsize companies offering reliable stability and simplicity in setup.

Microsoft Dynamics GP integrates with Microsoft Office and supports a range of business operations including financials, sales, and inventory management. Despite its strong functionality in financial reporting and analytics, it faces challenges with its outdated interface and limited cloud capabilities. Companies can enhance the system's functionality through Power Apps and Power Platform alongside third-party add-ons. While it is known for its financial stability and user-friendly navigation, improving integration and scalability remains a priority.

What are some key features?

Financial Control: Strong capabilities in accounting and compliance support.
Extensive Reporting: Provides customizable reporting and analytics options.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office and other systems.
Core Modules: Includes financials, sales, inventory management, and analytics.
Customization: Offers customizable solutions with third-party add-ons.

What benefits do businesses expect?

Reliable Stability: Offers easy setup and dependable performance.
User Navigation: Known for user-friendly interfaces.
Supportive Community: Access a strong network for guidance and collaboration.
Data Accuracy: Enhance data management with Smart Place features.

Many companies use Microsoft Dynamics GP as their primary accounting and financial management platform, supporting accounts payable, receivable, payroll, and inventory management. The integration capabilities allow it to serve as an ERP for small to midsize entities, facilitating additional functionalities in logistics, HR, warehouse operations, and more.

Microsoft

SAP ERP integrates modules like finance, supply chain, and material management, delivering seamless operations and real-time analytics. Its customization, scalability, and robust security make it ideal for large enterprises across different industries, enhancing decision-making and business efficiency.

SAP ERP is a comprehensive tool designed to streamline enterprise operations across finance, procurement, HR, sales, logistics, and manufacturing. Known for its adaptability and user-friendly interface, it supports real-time data analytics, crucial for informed decision-making. Its scalability ensures suitability for large organizations, while its reliable security measures protect data integrity. Despite its complexity and high initial costs, SAP ERP provides extensive customization options, aligning with specific business practices and enabling enhanced productivity. However, improvements are needed in integration with other systems and reporting features.

What are the key features of SAP ERP?

Module Integration: Seamless connectivity across finance, material management, and supply chain.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides up-to-date data for better decision-making.
Customizable Interface: Adapts to specific business needs for efficient processes.
Scalable Solution: Suitable for growing enterprises with diverse requirements.
Robust Security: Ensures data integrity with centralized measures.

What benefits or ROI should businesses look for when evaluating SAP ERP?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined business processes enhance productivity.
Data Consistency: Centralized data supports accurate business insights.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry standards.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Real-time analytics provide crucial information.
Scalability: Adaptation to growing business demands and requirements.

SAP ERP is utilized in sectors such as agriculture, healthcare, and utilities to integrate complex enterprise functions. It aids in production planning, financial control, and maintaining compliance with regulations. Its capability to align with distinct business requirements enables industries to achieve greater operational efficiency.

SAP

Sample Customers

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

B&G Manufacturing, Unilever, Life is good Inc., Joy Global Inc., City of Cape Town, Bhopal Municipal, Corporation (BMC), adidas Group, Butcher & Packer Supply Company, Franklin Valve L.P., Evoshield, Prime Meats, a Norsan Group company, EMC Corporation, Varian Medical Systems Inc., FC Bayern Mªnchen AG, AkzoNobel Chemicals B.V., T¾V Rheinland, Pacific Drilling S.A., Fire & Rescue New South Wales, University of Amsterdam, Pa_alon S.A.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP ERP

April 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP ERP

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP ERP and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP ERP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.