Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jira vs Microsoft Project Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Jira
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
267
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (2nd), Project Management Software (4th)
Microsoft Project Server
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
Project Portfolio Management (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

Saroj Ekka - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 10, 2024
Offers good repository integration, sprint board and easy to set up
There are some features and reports we need that are not there. For example, if I have to find out the capacity of the current sprint by user and compare it with the previous sprint, that visibility isn't there. We can know the capacity and what happened with the whole sprint, but not for an individual person to see where it's falling and how it's tracking. Report and analytics capabilities are important for a product manager. That visibility is important, so we use Jira. Some of the features are there, and I use my own Excels or other data things to compensate for that.
Hariharan Mahadevan - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 27, 2024
Effective resource allocation and collaboration tools with good flexibility
My clients use Microsoft Project Server since it is very useful and helpful, making their jobs and lives easier. It is particularly effective for program managers and is currently being used in my project Microsoft Project Server makes everything easier by providing a helpful and useful tool that…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ordinary user has an interface that is very clear."
"Provides good output and is user-friendly."
"The solution offers a lot of plugins."
"With the help of Jira, tasks are less likely to remain stagnant for a long time. We always see them somewhere on the board."
"I like that all of the team members on an agile team can use it. No one is in a separate application."
"We can create multiple boards for the same product backlogs."
"The level of stability is quite good."
"This tool can be used anywhere and on any device."
"I found the portfolio management valuable."
"Microsoft Project Server is easy to use compared to other similar solutions, such as Primavera. It functions similar to Excel or others Microsoft solutions which makes it simple for most people to be able to use right away."
"The most valuable feature of the Microsoft Project Server is the level of detail with which I can break down a task and check the dependencies."
"I like being able to manage the capacity in terms of the resources. I also like being able to share documents and information between teams. It's the best solution for collaboration."
"Technical support is very responsive - particularly on critical tickets."
"The usability is excellent."
"It can scale well."
"The solution is stable."
 

Cons

"Integration with some of the automation tools could be improved."
"It lacks features to cover all testing aspects, so we often integrate it with other plugins or tools like X-ray."
"The solution should be more user-friendly and include integration with different tools."
"Workflows can be improved. We don't use workflows because we can't handle that much complexity. Its interface could be more intuitive for workflows."
"​I would like integrated requirements management, so we do not have to buy plug-ins for JIRA, since it was hard to get requirements management for it.​"
"Sometimes it takes time to load the data."
"I wish the whole workflow process was easier to set up. You put the requirements in and then you send it to the developer. They get a notification. Then they go into Jira."
"The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat."
"The solution could improve the ease of access could improve. It can be time-consuming."
"It would be useful if the solution allowed us to share files or project schedules. You may get that with the cloud version. However, it's not available on the on-premises versions."
"We think that calculations are not working correctly, and there is a need to enter data a couple of times in order to give the correct calculations."
"When a lot of users logged onto the site, it took a big toll on the service. Therefore, there is a scalability issue."
"Stability of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The check-in, check-out feature makes Microsoft Project Server pretty slow or cumbersome to use."
"Work needs to be done on collaboration with SharePoint."
"It is not updated in real-time. Sometimes it, therefore, is not accurate."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are other solutions that are free making this solution seem expensive in comparison."
"It is certainly a long-term solution for our company and for previous companies that I have worked for. They have these long-term term licenses, but I'm not sure if they really pay on a yearly basis. They are certainly using it for a really long period and for a lot of users."
"We have an enterprise license that includes cloud service and support."
"To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money."
"The price is quite competitive."
"There are no additional costs to the standard licensing."
"It's not very cheap. It's also not very costly. I'd rate it a five out of ten in terms of pricing."
"We had a perpetual license but have changed to a subscription."
"Microsoft Project Server is relatively cheaper than other products."
"It's not subscription-based, we purchased the on-premises version."
"There is a licensing cost."
"I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses."
"We pay an annual licensing fee for the solution."
"It is an inexpensive product."
"A standard license is cheaper, but if you want more features, then there is a premium license or professional license."
"I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
813,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
49%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...
Has anyone tried integrating HP ALM and JIRA ?
HP ALM and Jira can be easily integrated with the aid of a third-party Integration Solution. To help you select the right integration approach and tool, you should first define your integration req...
What do you like most about Microsoft Project Server?
The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Project Server?
We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft, and our licensing is based on the agreement.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Project Server?
We sometimes need support from the IT department for installing and deploying the Microsoft Project Server. It is not user-friendly, and users cannot install it themselves.
 

Also Known As

Jira Software
MS Project Server
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. Microsoft Project Server and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
813,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.