Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
3.5
Kaspersky EDR Optimum users see quick ROI, reporting a 30% return, though some find financial gains hard to measure.
Sentiment score
7.4
Organizations achieve varied ROI with Trend Vision One, noting cost savings, enhanced security, and efficiency improvements up to 30%.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Kaspersky's customer service is reliable, responsive, knowledgeable, timely, and multilingual, though some users experience delays or seek third-party help.
Sentiment score
6.7
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security's support is praised for problem-solving but criticized for slow and non-localized service in some areas.
We usually solve issues ourselves due to our experience, as paid support is not used.
I rate the technical support between seven and eight out of ten for Kaspersky.
I have not needed much technical support except during the uninstallation issues, which took some time to resolve.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is praised for scalability but may require vendor input and XDR integration for improvement.
Sentiment score
7.9
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security excels in scalability and adaptability, supporting small to large organizations with effortless expansion capabilities.
Currently, I find it good and easily scalable.
It is very easy for me to scale.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is praised for stability and reliability, though occasional agent disconnections were noted.
Sentiment score
8.1
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is stable and reliable, with minor resource concerns and high user satisfaction ratings.
The solution is highly stable, scoring more than nine in terms of protection.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Kaspersky EDR needs integration, scalability, compatibility improvements, unified management, easier setup, transparent pricing, and enhanced feature transparency.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security needs improvements in functionality, compatibility, performance, support, analytics, and user experience for better protection.
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included.
Occasionally, I encounter connection problems, and the signal is not very good.
We face challenges with the automated effective awareness platform program (ASAP), particularly with its implementation.
We need more training resources for my team and I, such as developing labs and sessions to implement it more easily.
20% to 30% of endpoints faced difficulty in cleaning or uninstalling the software.
 

Setup Cost

Kaspersky Optimum offers cost-effective pricing, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises, with annual costs around €10,000 and competitive advantages.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers flexible pricing and straightforward setup, but some users find it expensive compared to competitors.
Kaspersky is very cheap compared to solutions like CrowdStrike or other vendors.
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.
 

Valuable Features

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection offers real-time threat response, advanced dashboard, comprehensive protection, scalability, and efficient automated threat management.
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers virtual patching, centralized management, machine learning, and real-time protection for comprehensive security.
It fulfills security and protection requirements against newly discovered malware, especially ransomware attacks.
I use Kaspersky to protect the domain and the network, allowing or denying web categories according to business needs.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is effective, especially in isolating computers from the network when needed.
The integration of ML and AI provides complete visibility, suggests responses, detects threats, and includes integration into XDR, which covers email security, endpoint security, cloud security, among other aspects.
The behavior analytics feature is very useful, and its threat detection based on AI is very strong.
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
33rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trend Vision One Endpoint S...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
131
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (3rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is 1.8%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

SharjeelFarooque - PeerSpot reviewer
Great threat response, provides for proactivity, and has automated threat identification
In terms of the Pakistani market and talking from a salesperson's perspective, I'd suggest that Kaspersky introduce a bundle of Kaspersky EDR-Optimum or Kaspersky EDR-Expert along with its Business Select/Advance suite. When I say this, I understand the Pakistani market and how slow and less eager organizations are to invest in IT and internet security. Most of them don't invest until or unless they face any attack or network failure. However, in addition to the product, Kaspersky should give EDR-Optimum on the cloud for less than 300 users as well, in case any customer has its whole network on the cloud. That way they can easily use it.
John Trembly - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides a single dashboard, integrates well, and has predictive machine learning
Microsoft's new Azure Code Signing is causing a lot of issues for us with One Endpoint Security. We currently have two systems in operation, on-prem and SaaS, and many of the agents won't upgrade beyond version B11564 because these newer versions require Azure Code Signing compliance on the endpoint. If we are not up to date with our Windows updates, we don't have this compliance. Irrespective of the Windows version we are running, we have to apply patches to the machines, if the OS is not damaged, to make them compliant. After that, we can upgrade to the latest version of the respective agent. This process also applies to both Deep Security and Workload Security. I have two production servers: one for Windows and another for Mac. These servers are available in both on-premise and SaaS versions. Additionally, I have a test server that is located on-premises. The significant distinction with the SaaS version is the absence of a test server where I can install a new version. This means I can't allow the agents on it to upgrade and then perform testing. In contrast, with the production SaaS version of One Endpoint Security, I have numerous agents transitioning and coming online. It's essential that these agents upgrade to a newer version. Among these agents, there are five or six different versions, not counting the really old ones that have yet to upgrade due to ACS non-compliance. I can't leave the testing phase for an extended period because I still have outdated agents that need to be updated. These agents can't be left hanging while I wait to test the newest version that has just been released. New versions seem to come out every couple of months in the SaaS environment. In the past, when I solely used the on-premises version, I would review security bulletins for the SaaS version to identify any issues. I'm apprehensive about potential future situations involving this, primarily because the majority of our agents now operate on the cloud version. If a problem is discovered, rolling back on those agents would be challenging. It would require careful operation to revert them to a different version. The on-premises version of One Endpoint Security has an update function that allows us to manually update a bunch of servers. For example, if I just turned on a policy, I can force the agents to quickly download the policy and start following the update procedure or update settings. However, this function is not available in the SaaS version. This is because the system cannot communicate with the agent through the firewall. The SaaS version has an automatic update function and an update source entry in the update agents sub-menu, but it does not have a way to force agents to update. This is a problem because we cannot automatically update the agents. We have to manually log in to the machines and give them an update command. Currently, we have no choice but to wait until the agents find the updates themselves.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Educational Organization
51%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
The product's most valuable feature is the flexibility of installation with the console and a simple administration strategy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
The value from Kaspersky is very good, especially since we recently got a special deal.
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum?
To increase the benefits of the product, Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service from Kaspersky should be included. I use this to monitor devices from a centralized location and report any abn...
What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?
Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising ...
What do you like most about Trend Micro Apex One?
It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro Apex One?
The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.