KerioConnect vs Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud comparison

GFI and Veritas are both solutions in the Email Archiving category. GFI is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Veritas is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. GFI holds a 3.8% mindshare in EA, compared to Veritas’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 57% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Veritas users who would recommend it.

KerioConnect

Read 10 KerioConnect reviews

39 Views
25 Comparison Views

57% willing to recommend

Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud

Read 2 Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud reviews

33 Views
23 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

KerioConnect

Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between KerioConnect and Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Email Archiving solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed KerioConnect vs. Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KerioConnect

Ranking in Email Archiving

7th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Applications (8th)

Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud

Ranking in Email Archiving

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

eDiscovery (7th), File Archiving (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Email Archiving category, the mindshare of KerioConnect is 3.8%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud is 4.3%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Archiving

Featured Reviews

David Bloomer

Senior Technician at Computers At Work

Lightweight, simple, and robust; easy to maintain and doesn't require a lot of system resources to run

Kerio Connect does as advertised, so there are no real issues with the product itself. It's developed regularly, so there are constant updates. Possibly, the support and development have lessened since they've sold the company, but as far as the product itself is concerned, there isn't anything that I would suggest needs improvement. If I'm being picky, Kerio Connect uses a proprietary, mappy atom for Outlook, and it would be nice if they used a native mappy connection instead, but that's the only additional feature that I would like to see in its next release. If they have native Outlook map integration, that would be great, but other than that, it's got all the functions that I think a mail server should have.

Read full review

Rastislav Maniak

Partial Owner at Storage One

Archives emails and files, providing indexes for searching the archives

The tool has had some scalability issues, but now that it's offered as a cloud service, it's easier to manage. However, setting it up isn't as straightforward as it used to be, and there may be limitations with the support provided during setup and testing. Also, the quality of support has declined in the past year.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"KerioConnect has integration with 365. We can use Outlook, which has its client and can be used with Apple devices. It integrates with the App Store and Microsoft Office. It has a smart router. The spam filtering and antivirus are good."

"What I like most about Kerio Connect is that it supports ActiveSync, and that is its most critical feature. The solution is also a nice, simple, robust, and stable mail server."

"We have contacted technical support a handful of times and received some assistance."

"Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface. It has many security features able to be controlled from one place, such as anti-spam. I have found it very convenient. Additionally, you can analyze log files and share folders which is helpful."

"The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud."

"The most valuable features are its ease of use, excellent pricing, and it is platform agnostic."

"We use the solution as a mail server. It connects with Outlook and is used for calendaring and similar tasks."

"The solution is easy to maintain, unlike Exchange. It's easy to create multiple domains and back up and restore if needed. It also has good security features like anti-spam and antivirus."

More KerioConnect pros

"The tool streamlines data discovery processes for compliance by setting up a gateway to copy every incoming and outgoing email to the archive independently of the mailbox. This ensures that even if a user deletes their mailbox, the emails are still available in the archive, making it a compliant solution for monitoring all incoming and outgoing emails. Additionally, it offers the ability to place legal holds on important emails."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

Cons

"It could be simpler to use and install, but I still wouldn't use it because there isn't a compelling use case."

"KerioConnect is stable as long as you use a strong password."

"Having a native Outlook map integration would make Kerio Connect better."

"We are considering switching to Microsoft Exchange. One reason is that it doesn't improve our workflow and doesn't integrate well with Microsoft 365 applications."

"The solution could improve the redundancy because we only have one copy of the Kerio Connect server on our hardware. The next step for us is to move to the cloud and if Kerio does not have a cloud version available they should release one"

"KerioConnect continues to improve with regular updates throughout the year. They must be added to the roadmap, which requires approval."

"You cannot integrate with other services like Google Docs, Google Assistant, Google Calendar, etc."

"I would like to see better support from their support team."

More KerioConnect cons

"The tool has had some scalability issues, but now that it's offered as a cloud service, it's easier to manage. However, setting it up isn't as straightforward as it used to be, and there may be limitations with the support provided during setup and testing. Also, the quality of support has declined in the past year."

"Technical support could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive."

"The pricing is about $3 per mailbox per month."

"The solution's pricing depends on how long you plan to keep it because you pay on a per-year basis. You might have a one-time setup cost for something like Microsoft Exchange or a Linux mail server. I'd say this solution is expensive on a per-year basis, almost 2000-3000 dollars annually. It doesn't seem to pay off yet, so we're considering switching to another product."

"The price of Kerio Connect is better when comparing it to others solutions."

"The tool is expensive, and I rate its price as eight out of ten. It might not be very expensive. However, comparing it with something that's free or already included in the price is challenging, like the Office 365 archive mailbox. Previously, this was part of the subscription price. Now, it's an additional cost, typically covered by departments like legal or compliance rather than IT."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Archiving solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Government

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

19%

Government

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about KerioConnect?

The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioConnect?

KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KerioConnect?

KerioConnect continues to improve with regular updates throughout the year. They must be added to the roadmap, which requires approval. In larger organizations, the server's capabilities and the da...

See all answers

What do you like most about Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud?

The tool streamlines data discovery processes for compliance by setting up a gateway to copy every incoming and outgoing email to the archive independently of the mailbox. This ensures that even if...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud?

The tool is expensive, and I rate its price as eight out of ten. It might not be very expensive. However, comparing it with something that's free or already included in the price is challenging, li...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Exchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 52% of the time

Zimbra Collaboration vs KerioConnect

Compared 29% of the time

IceWarp vs KerioConnect

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Exchange Online vs KerioConnect

Compared 7% of the time

Google Workspace vs KerioConnect

Compared 4% of the time

More KerioConnect Competitors

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud

Compared 83% of the time

Smarsh Enterprise Platform vs Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud

Compared 17% of the time

More Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect

March 2025

Download KerioConnect product report

Buyer's Guide

File Archiving

March 2025

Download Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Enterprise Vault.cloud

Overview

Kerio Connect, a messaging and collaboration solution, meets the needs of small and mid-sized businesses while offering a robust feature lineup. Business users enjoy support for their favorite email client and easy web-based access. Kerio Connect is highly stable—so you can focus on business rather than unexpected downtime and recovery.

GFI

Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud is a cloud-based archiving service that helps regulated organizations more effectively meet data governance requirements. and more efficiently execute business or legal eDiscovery. Thousands of customers have used Enterprise Vault.cloud to help ensure a successful and compliant migration to a cloud based application platform such as Microsoft Office 365 or Google G Suite Enterprise.

Veritas

Sample Customers

Southern Tier Brewing Company, Innotta, Baustoff + Metall, Hamifleurs, Chanson TV, Ryman Stationery

Lixil, CDCR, Windsor Foods, KM&A, Bear

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud

March 2025

Free Report: KerioConnect vs. Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about KerioConnect vs. Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our KerioConnect vs. Veritas Enterprise Vault.cloud report.

See our list of best Email Archiving vendors.

We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.