FortiCNAPP vs Trivy comparison

Fortinet and Aqua Security are both solutions in the Container Security category. Fortinet is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.3, while Aqua Security is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6. Fortinet holds a 2.9% mindshare in Container Security, compared to Aqua Security’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Aqua Security users who would recommend it.

FortiCNAPP

Read 13 FortiCNAPP reviews

5,179 Views
2,641 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Trivy

Read 12 Trivy reviews

5,573 Views
5,573 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

FortiCNAPP

Trivy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

FortiCNAPP and Trivy are key competitors in the cybersecurity and DevOps software arenas. FortiCNAPP appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced anomaly detection and policy recommendations which enhance security measures comprehensively.

Features: FortiCNAPP stands out with robust network segmentation, automated policy recommendations, and SIEM integration, leveraging machine learning for anomaly detection. It also offers detailed compliance reports. Trivy is notable for its seamless CI/CD pipeline integration and extensive scanning coverage, including container images, Kubernetes, and Terraform. Its open-source nature enhances flexibility and ease of integration across environments.

Room for Improvement: FortiCNAPP could enhance user navigation and improve compliance metrics visibility. Its user interface and integration with external systems like Slack may require streamlining. Trivy lacks a user interface and advanced reporting, needing better export options and quicker image scanning. Users desire an extensive database and integrations with malware detection tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FortiCNAPP offers strong deployment features integrations with DevOps tools, particularly in cloud environments, receiving positive feedback for its customer support. Trivy supports diverse environments from on-premises to cloud, but being open-source, it lacks in customer service feedback compared to FortiCNAPP.

Pricing and ROI: FortiCNAPP requires considerable investment, with users finding ROI in security and operational optimization. Its pricing is competitive for high-engagement customers. Trivy offers significant cost savings as an open-source tool, appealing to users needing essential functionality at no cost, significantly impacting ROI favorably for budget-conscious users.

To learn more, read our detailed FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,108 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FortiCNAPP

Ranking in Container Security

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (35th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (17th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (22nd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (16th), Compliance Management (10th)

Trivy

Ranking in Container Security

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of FortiCNAPP is 2.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trivy is 4.5%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Trivy	4.5%
FortiCNAPP	2.9%
Other	92.6%

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Mark Freeborough

Client Manager at MLL Telecom Ltd

Network segmentation has strengthened access control and now streamlines automated threat response

The most valuable features in FortiCNAPP include robust network segmentation and restricting access to network assets. It also supports security measures by leveraging security fabrics for better enforcement and policy enforcement. FortiCNAPP integrates with SIEM solutions, and we offer different SIEM options that work with Fortinet and AlienVault, among others, providing multiple scenarios.FortiCNAPP's automated policy recommendations significantly help improve security measures as part of an overall service wrap. When deploying a Fortinet SD-WAN or network, these tools provide greater visibility to vulnerabilities and enhanced security on the network. It functions as a proactive tool, enabling me to identify threats quickly and automate responses.

Read full review

Surya Aniketh Tamirisa

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Consistently maintains vulnerability-free images and integrates effectively with builds

Trivy is very reliable and always has an up-to-date database to scan images and identify vulnerabilities. I integrated it with Jenkins jobs, so every time we run a build, if there is a high, critical, or medium vulnerability, the build is set to fail. This ensures that somebody resolves the issues before the code progresses. This approach helps keep every image in every project we work on vulnerability-free.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For the most part, out-of-the-box, it tells you right away about the things you need to work on. I like the fact that it prioritizes alerts based on severity, so that you can focus your efforts on anything that would be critical/high first, moderate second, and work your way down, trying to continue to improve your security posture."

"The most valuable feature, from a compliance perspective, is the ability to use Lacework as a platform for multiple compliance standards. We have to meet multiple standards like PCI, SOC 2, CIS, and whatever else is out there. The ability to have reports generated, per security standard, is one of the best features for me."

"The most valuable aspects are identifying vulnerabilities—things that are out there that we aren't aware of—as well as finding what path of access attackers could use, and being able to see open SSL or S3 buckets and the like."

"Polygraph compliance is a valuable feature. In our perspective, it delivers significant benefits. The clarity it offers, along with the ability to identify and address misconfigurations, is invaluable. When such issues arise, we promptly acknowledge and take action, effectively collaborating with our teams and the responsible parties for those assets. This enables us to promptly manage problems as soon as they arise."

"The machine learning capability in Lacework FortiCNAPP is used for threat detection, and automated policy recommendation helps to improve my security measures in general."

"I find the cloud configuration compliance scanning mature. It generates a lot of data and supports major frameworks like ISO 27001 or SOC 2, providing reports and datasets. Another feature I appreciate is setting custom alerts for specific events. Additionally, I value the agent-based monitoring and scanning for compute nodes. It gives us deeper insights into our workloads and helps identify vulnerabilities across our deployed assets."

"Lacework is helping a lot in reducing the noise of the alerts. Usually, whenever you have a tool in place, you have a lot of noise in terms of alerts, but the time for an engineer to look into those alerts is limited. Lacework is helping us to consolidate the information that we are getting from the agents and other sources. We are able to focus only on the things that matter, which is the most valuable thing for us. It saves time, and for investigations, we have the right context to take action."

"The most valuable feature is Lacework's ability to distill all the security and audit logs. I recommend it to my customers. Normally, when I consult for other customers that are getting into the cloud, we use native security tools. It's more of a rule-based engine."

More FortiCNAPP pros

"The vulnerability scanning feature is excellent as it supports various container capabilities like Docker and Sharma."

"Trivy's ability to scan files, images, GitHub repositories, Infrastructure as Code like Terraform, and Kubernetes is valuable."

"I rate Trivy a nine out of ten."

"Trivy is easy to integrate with CI/CD and can be installed on desktops to scan images."

"Trivy's open source nature and wide functionality are incredibly valuable."

"What I find valuable is the ease of setup with Trivy, including pre-defined operators that require minimal configuration."

"It is open-source."

"One of the great features of Trivy is that it helps me scan items such as AWS credentials and GCP service accounts."

More Trivy pros

Cons

"I would like to see a remote access assistance feature. And the threat-hunting platform could be better."

"However, the solution could be more user-friendly and intuitive."

"Policy implementation is quite complex, and the stability will take more time for the solutions."

"Lacework has not reduced the number of alerts we get. We've actually had to add resources as a result of using it because the application requires a lot of people to understand it to get the value out of it properly."

"The configuration and setup of alerts should be easier. They should make it easier to integrate with systems like Slack and Datadog. I didn't spend too much time on it, but to me, it wasn't as simple as the alerting that I've seen on other systems."

"The solution lacks a cohesive data model, making extracting the necessary data from the platform challenging. It uses its own LQL query language, and each database across different layers and modules is structured differently, complicating correlation efforts. Consequently, I had to create extensive custom reports outside Lacework because their default dashboards didn't communicate risk metrics. They're addressing these issues by redesigning their tools, including introducing the dashboard, which is a step closer to actionable insights but still needs refinement."

"The biggest thing I would like to see improved is for them to pursue and obtain a FedRAMP moderate authorization... I don't believe they have any immediate plans to get FedRAMP moderate authorized, which is a bit of a challenge for us because we can only use Lacework in our commercial environment."

"There are a couple of the difficulties we encounter in the realm of cybersecurity, or security as a whole, that relate to potentially limited clarity. Having the capacity to perceive the configuration aspect and having the ability to contribute to it holds substantial advantages, in my view. It ranks high, primarily due to its role in guaranteeing compliance and the potential to uncover vulnerabilities, which could infiltrate the system and introduce potential risks. I had been exploring a specific feature that captured my interest. However, just yesterday, I participated in a product update session that announced the imminent arrival of this feature. The feature involves real-time alerting. This was something I had been anticipating, and it seems that this capability is now being integrated, possibly as part of threat intelligence. While anomaly events consistently and promptly appear in the console, certain alerts tend to experience delays before being displayed. Yet, with the recent product update, this issue is expected to be resolved. Currently, a comprehensive view of all policies is available within the console. However, I want a more tailored display of my compliance posture, focusing specifically on policies relevant to me. For instance, if I'm not subject to HIPAA regulations, I'd prefer not to see the HIPAA compliance details. It's worth noting that even with this request, there exists a filtering mechanism to control the type of compliance information visible. This flexibility provides a workaround to my preference, which is why it's challenging for me to definitively state my exact request."

More FortiCNAPP cons

"Trivy is not scalable; however, I have scanned very large projects with it. It is stable but not scalable according to my experience."

"The only problem is that Trivy does not support reporting features such as generating reports in CSV, which is useful for auditing and reporting."

"The reporting could be a little better."

"The only problem is that Trivy does not support reporting features such as generating reports in CSV, which is useful for auditing and reporting."

"A dynamic scanning capability during runtime would be a significant advantage."

"Currently, the container image scanning is static. A dynamic scanning capability during runtime would be a significant advantage."

"Having little experience can hinder the ability to connect it to a user-friendly UI effectively."

"For malware detection, I need to use two tools: Trivy as my anomaly scanner and ClamAV. I am integrating these two tools into the CI pipeline. If both malware and anomaly detection could be managed by one tool, I would not need to depend on two tools."

More Trivy cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing has gotten better. That scenario was somewhat unstable. They have a rather interesting licensing structure. I believe you get 200 resources per "Lacework unit." It was difficult, in the beginning, to figure out exactly what a "resource" was... That was a problem until about a year or so ago. They have improved it and it has stabilized quite a bit."

"My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz."

"The licensing fee was approximately $80,000 USD, per year."

"It is slightly expensive. It depends on how big your environment is, but it is expensive. Right now, we are spending a lot of money. We have covered all of the cloud providers and most of our colocation facilities as well, so we cannot complain, but it is slightly expensive. It is not super expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lacework?

My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lacework?

FortiCNAPP performs well in terms of threat notification and response times. However, the solution could be more user-friendly and intuitive. When managing the platform, navigating to certain detai...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lacework?

FortiCNAPP is typically used for network access control. The standard use cases for FortiCNAPP center around reporting and automated responses, particularly in IoT environments and workflow automat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Trivy?

Trivy's marketing and awareness need improvement. Not everyone knows about it, which isn't ideal given its capabilities. There's potential to integrate AI and machine learning for enhanced function...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Trivy?

I use Trivy ( /products/trivy-reviews ) to scan code for vulnerabilities before deployment. Our projects, which are developed by different developers, involve various dependencies and third-party c...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Trivy?

I recommend Trivy to others due to its powerful and useful features. However, I suggest increasing its marketing to raise awareness. I rate Trivy an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 4% of the time

Tenable Cloud Security vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 3% of the time

Native vs FortiCNAPP

Compared 3% of the time

More FortiCNAPP Competitors

JFrog Xray vs Trivy

Compared 19% of the time

Snyk vs Trivy

Compared 15% of the time

Kubescape vs Trivy

Compared 9% of the time

Wiz vs Trivy

Compared 8% of the time

SUSE NeuVector vs Trivy

Compared 7% of the time

More Trivy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FortiCNAPP

March 2026

Download FortiCNAPP product report

Buyer's Guide

Trivy

February 2026

Download Trivy product report

Also Known As

Polygraph, FortiCNP, Lacework

No data available

Overview

FortiCNAPP is a comprehensive cloud security platform focusing on ease of use and machine learning-driven anomaly detection. It offers robust compliance reporting, seamless integration, and continuous monitoring, making it an essential tool for organizations managing multi-cloud environments and security configurations.

FortiCNAPP provides significant capabilities in cloud security, compliance, and vulnerability management. Designed for organizations needing efficient monitoring, it enables detection of anomalies across cloud infrastructures while optimizing security posture and ensuring compliance with environments like AWS and GCP. The platform offers in-depth insights through scanning of IAC scripts, host systems, and cloud configurations. Recognized for effectively managing security posture, it safeguards Kubernetes and container environments, providing comprehensive threat detection and response. However, some areas like visibility, IAM security controls, and compliance metrics need improvement. Users face challenges with alert setup and lack intuitive design, alongside issues like FedRAMP authorization absence and complexity in the data model.

What are the key features of FortiCNAPP?

Ease of Use: FortiCNAPP simplifies security management for cloud environments.
Machine Learning Anomaly Detection: Automatically identifies and prioritizes threats.
Compliance Reporting: Streamlines compliance procedures and reporting.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth operation across multi-cloud environments.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides ongoing oversight of security vulnerabilities.
Multi-Cloud Integration: Enables swift response to misconfigurations and vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating FortiCNAPP?

Time Efficiency: Reduces time spent on compliance and threat management.
Improved Security Posture: Enhances protection for cloud and container environments.
Valuable Security Insights: Provides in-depth analysis for proactive threat response.
Noise Reduction: Distills security logs to minimize alert fatigue.
Operational Effectiveness: Facilitates seamless multi-cloud security management.

FortiCNAPP is implemented extensively by industries needing reliable cloud security, such as finance, healthcare, and technology sectors. It supports organizations in enhancing cloud infrastructure protection, ensuring compliance, and strengthening vulnerability management. By integrating with platforms like AWS and GCP, businesses can optimize security posture in their cloud deployments.

Fortinet

Trivy offers comprehensive scanning for files, images, repositories, and infrastructure. It's open-source and integrates with CI/CD for vulnerability detection and security enhancement.

Trivy scans vulnerabilities in code, Docker images, containers, and infrastructure. It integrates seamlessly into DevOps pipelines, ensuring security in dependency management and open source vulnerabilities. This tool, lightweight and open-source, provides user-friendly reports and supports continuous vulnerability database updates, fostering ease of use across operating systems. Users benefit from its scanning capabilities, covering Kubernetes, AWS credentials, and GCP service accounts, effectively identifying vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.

What are Trivy's key features?

Comprehensive Scanning: Covers files, images, repositories, infrastructure, and sensitive data.
CI/CD Integration: Easily integrates into existing pipelines for seamless security checks.
Open-Source & Lightweight: Quick setup and fast scanning capabilities ensure rapid deployment.
Continuously Updated Database: Keeps vulnerability data current for effective threat detection.
User-Friendly Reports: Generates understandable and actionable security insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Security: Provides in-depth analysis of vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.
Ease of Use: Designed for straightforward implementation and user interaction.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting industry security standards and regulations.
Cross-Platform Use: Effective across different operating systems, enabling wide scalability.

In industries like technology and finance, Trivy is used extensively to secure applications, perform compliance checks, and offer security metrics visualization. It addresses microservices, container systems, and Kubernetes clusters security requirements, supporting DevOps teams and enhancing codebase analysis precision.

Aqua Security

Sample Customers

J.Crew, AdRoll, Snowflake, VMWare, Iterable, Pure Storage, TrueCar, NerdWallet, and more.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy

February 2026

Free Report: FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy

Find out what your peers are saying about FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FortiCNAPP vs. Trivy report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.