Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LogicHub SOAR+ [EOL] vs Splunk SOAR comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

LogicHub SOAR+ [EOL]
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk SOAR
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

Reviewer32109 - PeerSpot reviewer
Integrated with hundreds of tools, analyzes data automatically, and has few false positives
The ability to analyze data automatically to make decisions automatically is what I like the most. It is also fully integrated with hundreds of other tools. Our SIEM has the search capability but it cannot save the dataset for me to merge with the result set of another query. In LogicHub, to join two resultant datasets is super easy because they use SQL operators that I can do left join, right join, inner join, or full cross join. Besides some reporting tools that I used in the past, no other SOAR can do this easily. We automated that whole analytic logic so I don’t need to repeat.
Hamada Elewa - PeerSpot reviewer
Creating automation workflows has reduced detection time but integration and visibility challenges remain
The visibility of Splunk SOAR's playbook viewer is rather unclear to me; I wonder what the visibility is for. There are indeed some problems with integrating Splunk SOAR with other Splunk products or other vendors in my system, and it took a while after implementing Splunk SOAR to train my SOC team on how to use the playbooks. Splunk SOAR does not help me reduce my security event volume; in fact, it makes them massive. Splunk SOAR does not help me free up resources to work on other projects; they are not good in this regard. I have not seen time to value with Splunk SOAR; I am curious about what time to value means. I believe Splunk SOAR can be improved by adding more integrations and out-of-the-box integrations, and by increasing the number of admins that can access the solution simultaneously. I see the need to inject more AI in creating the playbooks. I think they can inject more threat intelligence into the solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has improved my detection coverage in areas lacking by the SIEM."
"This solution allows us to easily investigate malicious events, system alerts etc."
"The best feature is the integration and the custom Python code that we can write. Splunk SOAR provides us with both of these capabilities, allowing us to integrate different security solutions with Splunk SOAR and take remediation actions directly on those security tools."
"We are not a 24/7 SOC, so the most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR is the auto-response to threats when we are not in the office and the notifications that it sends to the on-call engineer."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR that stands out is it has a great SOAR. The automation and orchestration module is highly mature. A lot of use cases are on user entity and behavioral analytics (UEBA), which is artificial intelligence and machine learning-based (AIML)."
"Splunk SOAR saves time in threat response, and the time to solve an incident is currently the best in the market."
"The playbooks are valuable. They are the core component. Being able to implement and build a code process to work through and scale out what we want to do is valuable."
"The customization continues to be excellent."
"In Splunk SOAR, I find the playbooks valuable. We get to create multiple playbooks, and within each playbook, there is a different type of investigation attached to it, which helps out an analyst or new analysts coming on board."
"Our customers find it easy to conduct searches and consider it an excellent content management system."
 

Cons

"UI coloring can be improved."
"We would like this solution to have a higher level of support for SaaS applications."
"The scalability could be better."
"The UI can be more customizable for the clients."
"It could be easier to implement."
"It would be ideal if we could automate processes even more."
"The cost of Splunk SOAR has room for improvement."
"They should integrate Splunk Enterprise Security better into Splunk Cloud."
"There are areas in Splunk SOAR that have room for improvement. To make Splunk SOAR a better solution, there could be better built-in debugging tools, smarter playbook suggestions, and enhanced lifecycle management."
"Splunk SOAR should improve its ease of upgrade, which is a pain point for us right now."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."
"While I can't confirm the exact pricing, some colleagues have mentioned that Splunk SOAR may be on the costlier side."
"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."
"Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all the functions and tie together the data. It's the perfect tool for our needs."
"In my opinion, the price is high, but if you want good products, you have to be willing to pay for them."
"I found the price of Splunk SOAR to be good."
"Splunk SOAR is moderately priced, neither cheap nor overly expensive."
"The tool is not cheap."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise30
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?
Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?
I don't have experience with costs; management handles that aspect.
What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?
I'm not an expert on Splunk SOAR, but I'm sure our team members know what areas could be improved. I haven't spoken to them specifically about what could be improved or what they would want Splunk ...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Phantom
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

motorola, McAfee, RSA, Splunk>,Anomali
Recorded Future, Blackstone
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: October 2025.
872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.