Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Lumu vs NetWitness NDR comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.0
Lumu's customer service is highly praised for efficient support and valuable assistance, particularly during setup and deployment.
Sentiment score
8.0
NetWitness NDR's customer service is generally efficient and highly regarded, though some users report occasional slow response times.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.2
Lumu requires enhanced management reports, faster log access, better integrations, and improved threat discovery in its free version.
Sentiment score
4.6
NetWitness NDR requires improvements in UI, scalability, detectability, integration, session times, pricing, training, and features, making it complex and slow.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.0
Lumu provides cost-effective, valuable solutions for enterprises, especially if packet access isn't needed, with competitive pricing compared to alternatives.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
Lumu offers comprehensive threat detection with ease of use, automation, integration, and effective data presentation for efficient cybersecurity management.
Sentiment score
7.8
NetWitness NDR offers high detection rates, real-time malware response, third-party integration, and a user-friendly, interoperable interface with advanced analytics.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.7
NetWitness NDR is scalable for large enterprises, though some users report issues with scalability and agent migration.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
NetWitness NDR is generally reliable, providing real-time data and stability, though minor technical issues are occasionally reported.
 

Categories and Ranking

Lumu
Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)
9th
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
17th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (12th)
NetWitness NDR
Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)
18th
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
34th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (59th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (33rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (59th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (27th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category, the mindshare of Lumu is 3.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetWitness NDR is 1.9%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Detection and Response (NDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Juan Solano - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing
Mostly, Lumu is an automatic tool. We'll deploy on firewalls and DNS servers. Lumu detects every attack on our network. The other day, we had CLC, the command controller, and the tool reacted automatically. It detected the attack and immediately blocked it without intervention from my team. The improvement is in the security process, as it's now entirely automated. We no longer require a technician or engineer to monitor our network 24/7. Lumu updates with AI and global threat intelligence, which greatly assists us. Since our workload is lighter, Lumu handles all of our tasks. We're using FortiGate for the firewall and Kaspersky for endpoints. If you are going to Lumu, you need another solution for the endpoint. You need to integrate with other tools like firewalls or another antivirus. I recommend the solution based on the price, usability, and service offered by the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
SupravatMaji - PeerSpot reviewer
Beneficial single unified dashboard, good native application integration, and high availability
My advice to those wanting to implement RSA NetWitness Network is they have to first do a little due diligence, such as the exact requirement based on their needs. That will give them a direction for their investment because otherwise, the bill of material or bill of quantity (BOQ) may be higher side. It is important to do good due intelligence on the environment, see the exact requirement, and then go ahead with the solution. The solution is perfectly stable. I rate RSA NetWitness Network a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lumu?
Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.
What needs improvement with Lumu?
Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed.
What is your primary use case for Lumu?
My company is currently dealing with Lumu's onboarding process. Lumu is used to monitor the environment permanently and validate if there is ransomware that can exploit our infrastructure.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
RSA ECAT, NetWitness Network
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
Find out what your peers are saying about Lumu vs. NetWitness NDR and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.