Malwarebytes vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Malwarebytes and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Malwarebytes is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.9, while Trellix is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.6. Malwarebytes holds a 1.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Malwarebytes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Malwarebytes

Read 37 Malwarebytes reviews

4,194 Views
3,627 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

5,220 Views
3,987 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Malwarebytes

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Malwarebytes and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) compete in the cybersecurity space. Users are generally happier with the features of Malwarebytes, but Trellix ENS has more robust enterprise capabilities, making it a preferred choice for larger organizations.

Features: Malwarebytes is praised for its simplicity and effectiveness in malware detection and removal. Trellix ENS offers comprehensive security features, including advanced threat detection and response, making it more suitable for complex IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Users mention that Malwarebytes could improve its reporting and analytics. Trellix ENS users highlight the need for a more streamlined configuration process. Both products receive feedback on enhancing their integration with other security tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes is noted for easy deployment and responsive customer service. Trellix ENS, while requiring a more involved setup, offers robust support for enterprise deployments and complex security needs. Users appreciate the dedicated support teams provided by Trellix.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes is often seen as cost-effective with a good return on investment for small to mid-sized companies. Trellix ENS, despite higher setup costs, is considered worth the investment by large enterprises due to its extensive features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Malwarebytes

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Malwarebytes is 1.7%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.5%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Anas Anas

Solution Consultant at Creation for Smart Software Development

Effective threat predictions, simple to deploy, and light on resources

Malwarebytes's initial setup is simple. It is easy to deploy and configure the policies and the configuration. I deployed Malwarebytes for one customer and I did it in under two days. They had approximately 50 users, it took approximately an hour. The steps I took for the implementation were downloading the Malwarebytes management console from the site, installing it, then running the discovery tool, scanning my network, and checking all of the PCs on my network. It's already pre-configured, you don't need to configure anything. The only configuration that I did on the administration console was some of the exclusion from the scan. This is the only rule that I have created. I rate the initial setup of Malwarebytes a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Shreyansh Sharma

Instrument and Control Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool

The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very good at scanning."

"It's very versatile and thorough."

"I like the solution's ability to detect potentially unwanted programs. For some reason, it seems superior to other solutions, or at least in comparison to McAfee."

"It is intuitive and easy to use. For the most part, it does a good job of catching things. It is good at stopping stuff. I did a couple of tests with a password cracker. I tried to load that on, and Malwarebytes didn't let me do that, which was pretty good. It has a rollback feature that I haven't seen with any other company. If one of your endpoints are hit with mass ransomware, you could actually roll it back. I watched a demo of them do that, and it was pretty sweet."

"The central management of devices from different sites is a very good feature; this has made them much easier to manage."

"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the EDR and the complete feature set provided."

"The platform is straightforward to install."

"When it comes to frontend protections, it has some of the best definitions. In addition, they do traditional signature and heuristic detection a lot better than Microsoft and some other players in that space."

More Malwarebytes pros

"The activation of features within ENS and the collection of threats into a single console is a strong point."

"I have not received any complaints about the performance."

"The seamless deployment is very valuable."

"MVISION offers decent protection."

"Provides good mobile device protection."

"The agents are easy to deploy."

"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

Cons

"Malwarebytes can improve its network database. Malwarebytes can scan the files and registry. It can scan the system with a light agent. It will not impact the performance of your PC. You can do the full scan and database scan using the EDR, and the RAM and CPU consumption will not increase."

"Requires increased efficiency in terms of detecting false positives."

"I would like to see integration with other vendors going forward."

"They could come up with better reporting capabilities."

"Malwarebytes should improve its mobile compatibility."

"They should make it faster, less taxing on the processor."

"We have noticed that when the solution is doing the scanning, all the scanning activities make the device heavier. It slows down your machine."

"This solution reports far too many false positives!"

More Malwarebytes cons

"The detection and response capabilities need to be improved."

"One suggestion is they should reduce the constant notifications. Whenever I open my laptop, there are too many notifications from McAfee, and it gets annoying."

"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."

"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."

"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."

"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."

"The performance could be better. I noticed that it slows down a bit."

"They could also increase or improve the scalability because to my knowledge the biggest bandwidth can only support up to 10 gigs of input."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"It is expensive."

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"Its cost is around $60 a machine. The cost of the total solution for 250 people is about $8,500 a year. If we add EDR to it, it will bring that cost up to about $15,000. The cost for Carbon Black is about $25,000, which is $10,000 more, but you get all AI functions with it."

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the product's pricing a seven."

"The price of Malwarebytes is in the middle range compared to other vendors."

More Malwarebytes pricing and cost advice

"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."

"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."

"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

University

12%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at least confirm with me, like a month before they bill me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes

Compared 13% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

More Malwarebytes Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 16% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes

March 2025

Download Malwarebytes product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

March 2025

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Overview

Malwarebytes is used for malware detection, endpoint protection, ransomware prevention, and behavior monitoring on Windows and Mac, serving as an EDR for detecting usage behaviors and providing comprehensive security features.

Primarily deployed for compliance scanning, real-time threat monitoring, and as a supplementary antivirus, Malwarebytes is favored for security assessments, cloud management, and endpoint protection for both personal and company use. Featuring robust scanning, ease of use, and a user-friendly interface, it effectively prevents and removes malware, detects unwanted programs, and provides real-time updates. The management interface and dashboard offer strong endpoint protection, automated updates, detailed reporting, and quick remediation, minimizing downtime. Comprehensive protection, extensive visibility, and efficient performance are highly valued.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes?

Robust Scanning and Threat Detection: Efficiently identifies and removes malware.
Ease of Use: Simple and straightforward interface for users.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and management dashboards.
Cloud Management: Manage endpoints through cloud-based solutions.
Automated Updates: Ensures protection with regular updates.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive and detailed security reports.
Quick Remediation: Minimizes downtime with fast threat removal.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Ensures security against diverse threats.
Effective Performance: Maintains system performance while protecting.
Minimized Downtime: Quick threat removal ensures business continuity.
Extensive Visibility: Detailed logs and reports for better oversight.

Industries implementing Malwarebytes benefit from enhanced endpoint protection, compliance scanning, and security assessments. It is frequently utilized in IT departments for real-time threat monitoring, automated remediation, and cloud management, providing organizations with reliable security for both personal and company endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Knutson Construction

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

March 2025

Free Report: Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Find out what your peers are saying about Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.