Malwarebytes vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Malwarebytes and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Malwarebytes is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while Trellix is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.5. Malwarebytes holds a 1.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Malwarebytes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Malwarebytes

Read 37 Malwarebytes reviews

3,980 Views
3,462 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

4,570 Views
3,544 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Malwarebytes

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Malwarebytes and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) compete in the cybersecurity space. Users are generally happier with the features of Malwarebytes, but Trellix ENS has more robust enterprise capabilities, making it a preferred choice for larger organizations.

Features: Malwarebytes is praised for its simplicity and effectiveness in malware detection and removal. Trellix ENS offers comprehensive security features, including advanced threat detection and response, making it more suitable for complex IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Users mention that Malwarebytes could improve its reporting and analytics. Trellix ENS users highlight the need for a more streamlined configuration process. Both products receive feedback on enhancing their integration with other security tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes is noted for easy deployment and responsive customer service. Trellix ENS, while requiring a more involved setup, offers robust support for enterprise deployments and complex security needs. Users appreciate the dedicated support teams provided by Trellix.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes is often seen as cost-effective with a good return on investment for small to mid-sized companies. Trellix ENS, despite higher setup costs, is considered worth the investment by large enterprises due to its extensive features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,959 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Malwarebytes

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

27th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Malwarebytes is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Anas Anas

Solution Consultant at Creation for Smart Software Development

Effective threat predictions, simple to deploy, and light on resources

Malwarebytes's initial setup is simple. It is easy to deploy and configure the policies and the configuration. I deployed Malwarebytes for one customer and I did it in under two days. They had approximately 50 users, it took approximately an hour. The steps I took for the implementation were downloading the Malwarebytes management console from the site, installing it, then running the discovery tool, scanning my network, and checking all of the PCs on my network. It's already pre-configured, you don't need to configure anything. The only configuration that I did on the administration console was some of the exclusion from the scan. This is the only rule that I have created. I rate the initial setup of Malwarebytes a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Shreyansh Sharma

Instrument and Control Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool

The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I never have to look at it or do anything with it, and then my system just stays clean."

"It's very versatile and thorough."

"It is intuitive and easy to use. For the most part, it does a good job of catching things. It is good at stopping stuff. I did a couple of tests with a password cracker. I tried to load that on, and Malwarebytes didn't let me do that, which was pretty good. It has a rollback feature that I haven't seen with any other company. If one of your endpoints are hit with mass ransomware, you could actually roll it back. I watched a demo of them do that, and it was pretty sweet."

"Being able to carry out a full scan on your system."

"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the EDR and the complete feature set provided."

"It gets the job done, and they are consistently updating it monthly."

"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the agents, user experience, efficiency of the findings, and MDR features."

"It comprehensively finds and removes malicious software."

More Malwarebytes pros

"The tool has contributed to improving our security posture. While it's just one part of our overall solution, it plays a crucial role. As we continue to evolve, we anticipate it becoming even more important alongside other aspects like network behavior and additional metrics."

"The response part of EDR was most valuable. We used that to separate the endpoint from the network. We utilized the solution during the instant response. We were also utilizing advanced malware detection capabilities, but we benefited the most from its help with the response."

"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."

"I have not received any complaints about the performance."

"The EPO, the ePolicy Orchestrator, is the best endpoint protection central management system."

"It's a stable solution with good performance."

"HIPS protects server files from being modified or deleted by unauthorized users. It's primarily deployed in the web tier."

"What I like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint is that it's very user-friendly. You do need some knowledge on how to navigate the portal, but as soon as you've gained that knowledge, navigation will no longer be an issue. I have no complaints about McAfee MVISION Endpoint. For me, the product is perfect the way it is. It's great right now, and it's doing good as it is."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

Cons

"If they want to compete with bigger players, they should consider adding items like threat detection and website warnings."

"It's not good in search hunting."

"I would like to see a little more detail in the log. So, when an event occurs, I'd like to know not just when it happened and on what device, but what activity was taking place on the machine at the time so that we can drill down. If we get a false positive, we have to do a lot of research and go back and forth with our end-users to know why it was a false positive. So, having a little more detail around detections and events would probably be my most asked feature."

"We experience a lot of false positives."

"They should make it faster, less taxing on the processor."

"The product has major problems in almost every facet of setup and use including setup, configuration, lack of functionality, lack of stability, false positives, questionable reporting, inability to protect from randsomeware and poor technical support and development."

"Malwarebytes can improve its network database. Malwarebytes can scan the files and registry. It can scan the system with a light agent. It will not impact the performance of your PC. You can do the full scan and database scan using the EDR, and the RAM and CPU consumption will not increase."

"The EPP solution lacks the sophisticated artificial intelligence required for automating reports and letting you know about things in real-time. It stops a suspicious activity in real-time, but it doesn't let you know in real-time. You have to look at a report, and then you find out that something is wrong. You have to manually kick off a scan. With the Advanced EDR solutions, Malwarebytes has the ability to alert you in real-time, but they still don't do automatic remediation or quarantining of devices. That is something that you still have to do manually. So, the endpoint protection piece, which is just like their basic endpoint protection, lacks AI. For the advanced detection and response piece, there is an add-on that comes with it, but it still doesn't go far enough in terms of automatic remediation of viruses. It won't separate that virus from your network if something happens. You have to manually go there and do it."

More Malwarebytes cons

"From an improvement perspective, I want everything in the solution to be free."

"The customization capabilities of the solution are an area where it lacks, so it would be great if our company could customize the solution to meet the demands of our customers."

"The detection and response capabilities need to be improved."

"Performance is a problematic area in the solution needing improvement."

"Most of these types of solutions including others, such as Carbon Black and FortiEDR, all have the same features. However, Carbon Black is the leader when it comes to being robust and user-friendly and this solution should improve in those areas to stay more competitive."

"It is a bit technical. The user interface has some significant limitations, mainly when using HIPS on the server side, to protect files from being changed or deleted by hackers, users, or administrators."

"The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious task."

"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its cost is around $60 a machine. The cost of the total solution for 250 people is about $8,500 a year. If we add EDR to it, it will bring that cost up to about $15,000. The cost for Carbon Black is about $25,000, which is $10,000 more, but you get all AI functions with it."

"The price of Malwarebytes is in the middle range compared to other vendors."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the product's pricing a seven."

More Malwarebytes pricing and cost advice

"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."

"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."

"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."

"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

University

12%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at least confirm with me, like a month before they bill me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes

Compared 14% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Malwarebytes

Compared 6% of the time

More Malwarebytes Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes

March 2025

Download Malwarebytes product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

March 2025

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Overview

Malwarebytes is used for malware detection, endpoint protection, ransomware prevention, and behavior monitoring on Windows and Mac, serving as an EDR for detecting usage behaviors and providing comprehensive security features.

Primarily deployed for compliance scanning, real-time threat monitoring, and as a supplementary antivirus, Malwarebytes is favored for security assessments, cloud management, and endpoint protection for both personal and company use. Featuring robust scanning, ease of use, and a user-friendly interface, it effectively prevents and removes malware, detects unwanted programs, and provides real-time updates. The management interface and dashboard offer strong endpoint protection, automated updates, detailed reporting, and quick remediation, minimizing downtime. Comprehensive protection, extensive visibility, and efficient performance are highly valued.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes?

Robust Scanning and Threat Detection: Efficiently identifies and removes malware.
Ease of Use: Simple and straightforward interface for users.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and management dashboards.
Cloud Management: Manage endpoints through cloud-based solutions.
Automated Updates: Ensures protection with regular updates.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive and detailed security reports.
Quick Remediation: Minimizes downtime with fast threat removal.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Ensures security against diverse threats.
Effective Performance: Maintains system performance while protecting.
Minimized Downtime: Quick threat removal ensures business continuity.
Extensive Visibility: Detailed logs and reports for better oversight.

Industries implementing Malwarebytes benefit from enhanced endpoint protection, compliance scanning, and security assessments. It is frequently utilized in IT departments for real-time threat monitoring, automated remediation, and cloud management, providing organizations with reliable security for both personal and company endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Knutson Construction

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

April 2025

Free Report: Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Find out what your peers are saying about Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.