Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs VIPRE Endpoint Security comparison

Trellix and VIPRE Security are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Trellix is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.5, while VIPRE Security is ranked #62. Trellix holds a 1.6% mindshare in EPP, compared to VIPRE Security’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Trellix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of VIPRE Security users who would recommend it.
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews
  • 4,570 Views
  • 3,544 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
VIPRE Endpoint Security
Read 2 VIPRE Endpoint Security reviews
  • 461 Views
  • 390 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

VIPRE Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) are both strong contenders in endpoint protection. Trellix ENS is preferred due to its advanced features, despite higher costs.

Features: VIPRE Endpoint Security is valued for its straightforward installation, real-time threat monitoring, and cost-effectiveness. Trellix ENS is praised for its robust integration capabilities, automated threat detection, and extensive documentation support.

Room for Improvement: VIPRE could improve its reporting and analytical tools, enhance user interface intuitiveness, and offer more frequent updates. Trellix ENS users need better performance optimization, lower resource usage, and streamlined configuration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VIPRE is praised for its simple deployment process and responsive customer service. Trellix ENS, though slightly more complex to deploy, has extensive documentation and a supportive customer service team.

Pricing and ROI: VIPRE offers competitive pricing and good ROI, making it attractive to smaller businesses. Trellix ENS, while more expensive, delivers high ROI through its comprehensive protection features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,989 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
27th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (20th)
VIPRE Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
62nd
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VIPRE Endpoint Security is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Shreyansh Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool
The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.
Read full review
JT
Easy to deploy, good price, low overhead, and keeps our Servers and PC's free of virus'
Their management interface is a little buggy as it will hang up and crash from time to time. Although It requires more system resources than the desktop client, adding additional resources' ex. CPU and Memory don't seem to improve it. Its reporting can also be improved as the executive and patching reports are missing the ability to provide what groups of PC's are included in the reports. Also, It's great they patch some third-party software, but it is a limited list expanding this would be a huge improvement. I'm yet to see it properly handle USB Device control.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."
"Trellix Endpoint Security seems to do a good job in terms of protecting my infrastructure from malware."
"The independent modules are very good."
"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard."
"The activation of features within ENS and the collection of threats into a single console is a strong point."
"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."
"The EPO, the ePolicy Orchestrator, is the best endpoint protection central management system."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros
"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."
"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."
 

Cons

"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."
"The detection and response capabilities need to be improved."
"In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We opened a few cases for the vendor to help us with some miscategorized findings on the endpoints. There were some false positive detections, and we had to work with the vendor to get them tested. We even had some incidents that were not detected. It was a black box type of solution for us."
"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."
"We would like to solution to offer better security."
"The central monitoring dashboard needs improvement."
"Looking at the current ePolicy orchestrator, and the transition of most vendors to the cloud, they need to do an improvement with the current dashboard or the overall aesthetic of their GUI."
"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons
"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."
"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."
"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."
"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."
"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."
"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."
"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice
"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."
"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
20%
Government
12%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 19% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 17% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 14% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 11% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 7% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security
Compared 25% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security
Compared 19% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Business vs VIPRE Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business vs VIPRE Endpoint Security
Compared 14% of the time
Malwarebytes vs VIPRE Endpoint Security Logo
Malwarebytes vs VIPRE Endpoint Security
Compared 11% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs VIPRE Endpoint Security Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs VIPRE Endpoint Security
Compared 11% of the time
More VIPRE Endpoint Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
March 2025
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report
Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
April 2025
VIPRE Endpoint Security reportDownload VIPRE Endpoint Security product report
 

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
VIPRE Cloud, VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud Edition, VIPRE Endpoint Security Server Edition
 

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response. 

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints. 

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

VIPRE Endpoint Security provides fast, powerful and easy-to-manage endpoint protection for businesses of all sizes, with a small footprint that won't slow you down.

VIPRE Security
 

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
College Station ISD, Mid-West Companies, Guardian Network Solutions
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security
April 2025
Free Report: Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.