

Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Zendesk compete in the customer relationship and ticketing services category. Microsoft Dynamics CRM appears to have the upper hand with its broader integration capabilities with Microsoft tools and sales management features, whereas Zendesk excels with its intuitive user experience and strong ticket management system.
Features: Microsoft Dynamics CRM is noted for its customization and integration, allowing configuration to business needs. It offers visibility of customer interactions and robust sales process management tools. Zendesk is appreciated for its ease of use and strong ticket management, supporting various channels like chat and social media through seamless integrations.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics CRM needs a more user-friendly and intuitive design, as users find the setup and configuration complex. Zendesk could enhance its reporting and system customization to provide more intuitive updates and integration with other platforms, increasing flexibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics CRM is available on public, private, and on-premises cloud platforms, offering versatile deployment options. Customer service feedback is mixed, with some users mentioning responsive support and others noting delays. Zendesk primarily uses cloud deployment, offering flexibility and scalability. Its customer service is generally well-received, although some users find the setup process requires vendor support due to a learning curve.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics CRM is considered costly, with pricing potentially high for small businesses, but its significant ROI is attributed to robust functionality and integration. Zendesk's pricing can also be high, especially for enterprise features, but it is recognized for enhancing efficiency and customer satisfaction, providing measurable returns relative to investment levels.
I recommend that those considering Microsoft Dynamics CRM conduct an ROI exercise to determine scalability and complex business needs because it is indeed a fantastic tool, especially if Microsoft can provide a better commercial model, which can significantly impact cost-effectiveness.
I can tell you that we probably saved at least three employees full-time with the ticket management and the automation and the macros and the user follow-up being built in.
Time saved is definitely a benefit because it puts all of our tickets in one spot.
I feel that Zendesk helped us set up our platform for providing support way faster than other platforms due to its easy configuration.
I would rate customer support as ten out of ten.
When we create a technical ticket for Microsoft, mostly the ETA is two to three days, but we mostly get responded to in 24 hours.
While the support operates within their standard SLA, it can be difficult to speak directly with someone over the phone.
There appears to be a lack of connection between the bot and the agents, making it feel scripted rather than helpful.
The technical support provided by Zendesk has been very satisfactory.
Their support team from Zendesk is excellent, similar to what you have in Freshdesk.
Microsoft Dynamics CRM is highly scalable, rated at ten, even fifteen out of ten.
I would give it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Microsoft Dynamics CRM is scalable; it's easy to scale, but when customizations become extensive, maintainability can become challenging.
We have not hit a peak or a turn yet that Zendesk has not been able to go with us or been able to grow with us in the process, change or pivot that the company is making.
Zendesk can scale from very small companies to very large ones.
Zendesk's scalability is excellent.
I would rate it ten out of ten.
There have been instances where issues with Microsoft Azure have affected Dynamics due to the infrastructure layer.
In the last two or three years, I have not seen anything or heard of that occurring with someone else anywhere in our organization.
They are always informing us with a status update and an ETA, and the turnaround time is usually within the same day with no extended downtime that would cause a detriment to our company.
Zendesk is quite stable; we experience major outages only once or twice a year, making it very reliable.
The stability has been quite reliable.
More use-case-oriented material should be provided to help users and implementers learn how to do more, faster.
Microsoft Dynamics CRM needs improvement in simplifying the setup and configuration process, which can be relatively complex when we want all features to work properly.
Microsoft Dynamics CRM doesn't provide solutions that allow you to transform easily if you have a heterogeneous mix of technologies or if your contact center is on analog and you try to digitize it.
Zendesk could actually support HTML on the tickets so we could format our text better than the current options such as size, bold, italic, or underscored, because the text processing is too simple.
Zendesk is missing an AI aspect that could help provide quick answers based on the knowledge housed within the platform.
Zendesk is amazing, and because they are always working on a new upgrade or a new integration, they are very forward-thinking from an engineering perspective.
When we compare it to SAP or something like that, Microsoft Dynamics CRM is a very affordable solution.
The pricing of Microsoft Dynamics CRM can be complex due to Microsoft's complicated licensing model.
Microsoft Dynamics CRM costs about $110 to $115 per user per month, following a recent price increase.
It is not the cheapest solution nor the most expensive, but it provides value for money.
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Zendesk was quite expensive.
The backend storage integrates seamlessly with OneDrive, and the solution offers robust security features, including Azure integration, two-factor authentication (2FA), and comprehensive audit trails.
The CRM is very fast, which is the most important aspect, and it's very handy.
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is its integration with Outlook and other Microsoft products like Microsoft 365, which includes emails, Teams, and SharePoint.
It allows us to handle more support cases with fewer people due to its advanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
Zendesk is way cheaper than other ITSM platforms such as ServiceNow, providing a good platform at a lower price so we could offer good support with a low budget for the license.
Being able to put response counters on certain tickets and have certain ones that are high priority and have a tighter SLA than lower priority items, being able to categorize them as a question versus an urgent request, and being able to bucket them as feature requests or product enhancements.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Dynamics CRM | 13.4% |
| Zendesk | 8.7% |
| Other | 77.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Microsoft Dynamics CRM integrates with Microsoft tools, offering ease of use and customization. Its interface and reporting features streamline sales and customer engagement, effectively managing leads and interactions.
Microsoft Dynamics CRM allows for seamless integration with Office 365 and Power Automate, providing scalability and security, and mobile access. It supports data handling and business process automation, optimizing workflows for diverse needs. Users note improvements needed in user-friendliness, mobile integration, and cost-effectiveness for small businesses. While managing sales and opportunity effectively, some find the interface complex and integrations with other systems, including ERP, needing enhancement. Performance may be slow and require heavy customization, with demands for better integration documentation, more detailed profiles, enhanced AI capabilities, and faster support.
What are the essential features of Microsoft Dynamics CRM?Organizations in industries such as finance, retail, and manufacturing leverage Microsoft Dynamics CRM for analytics, marketing, and customer engagement. It's integrated into data management and team collaboration efforts, with some using custom integration for HR, IT ticketing systems, and project management. Limitations are found in UI customization and analytics capabilities in specific industries.
Zendesk provides a versatile platform for managing customer interactions, offering efficient ticketing, customization, and integration features across multiple channels to enhance user experiences.
Zendesk stands out for its simplicity, ease of use, and comprehensive integration capabilities with CRM tools, which help optimize workflow efficiency. Users benefit from advanced analytics and reporting features that offer valuable insights into customer behavior. Multi-channel support and self-service portals are integral components, enhancing customer interaction experiences. While security protocols and flexible configurations contribute to its broad appeal, areas for improvement include more intuitive reporting, advanced customization of triggers and automations, and enhancements in knowledge management. Users express the need for better ticket management functionalities, efficient data synchronization, and refined interface aesthetics. Performance can be impacted by extensive customization, and there’s a call for competitive pricing and simplified licensing options.
What are Zendesk's most important features?Zendesk is extensively applied across sectors for customer support management and technical issue resolution. In HR or IT settings, it facilitates internal requests and knowledge base creation. Organizations leverage Zendesk's integration with collaboration tools like Slack and Jira, automating workflows and delivering detailed analytics, which are particularly useful for multinational operations handling queries in different languages and brands.
We monitor all CRM Customer Engagement Centers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.