Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Power Apps vs OutSystems vs QuickBase comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
Organizations using Microsoft Power Apps saw increased productivity and efficiency despite licensing challenges, with notable cost and resource savings.
Sentiment score
7.0
OutSystems provides high ROI with faster app creation, cost-saving strategies, and positive user feedback despite some cost concerns.
Sentiment score
7.1
QuickBase delivers significant financial benefits by reducing costs, increasing productivity, improving efficiency, and enhancing business visibility.
The connection between Power Apps and Power BI simplifies generating and presenting reports, alleviating the workload and enhancing productivity.
The aim is to create a cleaner interface to replace spreadsheets, thus standardizing processes and improving efficiency.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.4
Microsoft Power Apps support is effective but inconsistent, with varied response times and reliance on community resources and documentation.
Sentiment score
7.2
OutSystems support is generally responsive but experiences vary, with better service at higher contract levels and valued documentation.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase customer service excels in quick technical support with extensive resources, despite limited weekend support and occasional delays.
Their assistance was crucial as we developed the solutions.
Microsoft's technical support is around a seven to eight.
Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Microsoft Power Apps is scalable with customization and integration, though costs and performance limitations can affect larger deployments.
Sentiment score
7.7
OutSystems is scalable and robust, ideal for enterprise-level growth, especially in cloud-based and multi-tenant environments.
Sentiment score
7.7
QuickBase is highly scalable, efficiently managing growth in users and data, with strong support for expanding applications.
If it is flexible and includes premium connectors, scalability is easy.
Quick Base has high potential to scale.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Microsoft Power Apps is praised for stability, reliability, and effective data handling, despite occasional slowdowns or complex app issues.
Sentiment score
8.0
OutSystems is stable and reliable, highly rated for support and scalability but faces issues with massive user bases.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase is stable with minor disruptions, rated highly by users for reliability and timely maintenance communication.
I would rate the stability of Microsoft Power Apps as a nine out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Power Apps needs better integration, simpler licensing, improved UI, and enhanced resources for usability and large data handling.
OutSystems needs performance, integration, and cost improvements, along with better documentation, UI, AI integration, and cloud management.
QuickBase requires better customization, UI, mobile experience, improved reporting, integrations, security, formulas, training, APIs, and cost management.
This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.
These tools should be intuitive for business users who will need at least a week of training to use them effectively.
The integration of Microsoft's autonomous AI agents would be an excellent enhancement for Power Apps.
I would like to see more integration between the use of artificial intelligence to speed up the process delivery time.
The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Power Apps pricing starts at $10/month, varies by usage and features, with special rates for non-profits and governments.
OutSystems pricing is often considered high, with costs based on user metrics, impacting small businesses but saving development time.
Enterprise buyers appreciate QuickBase's flexible pricing, but costs rise with users; negotiating tailored solutions is advised for large enterprises.
For small to medium enterprises, it is affordable, especially with Microsoft Enterprise licensing.
For more elaborate work, an upgrade to an enterprise license, costing around $35 per license, is needed.
Pricing could be cheaper.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Power Apps enables rapid, low-code app development with seamless Microsoft integration, enhancing workflows and data visualization efficiently.
OutSystems excels in low-code development, effortless integration, and user-friendly features, making it a versatile and scalable platform.
QuickBase provides code-free app creation, customization, and efficient data management, enhancing operational efficiency with PaaS capabilities and API integrations.
It integrates seamlessly with Power Automate for process automation and connects with email, SharePoint, Power BI, and MS Teams, facilitating everyday processes.
If we are using Outlook or Power BI for our reports, the integration is easier because it is within the Microsoft ecosystem.
The most valuable features for us are predominantly on the user interface front.
OutSystems offers a lot of reusable components and solutions that I can simply drag and drop and use, which has a significant impact on project delivery time.
This provides a unified solution without needing different databases or pipelines.
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Power Apps is 14.5%, down from 22.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OutSystems is 8.0%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Guhan Eshwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Building tools with user-friendly interfaces abut needs integration improvements
An integration of Copilot options within Microsoft Power Apps would be useful. In UiPath apps, there is an autopilot function that uses a generative AI model, which creates layouts and connects data services automatically with a prompt. Such integration would be beneficial to build basic frameworks that can be enhanced. This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.
Bireswar Das - PeerSpot reviewer
A low-code platform for the development of mobile and web enterprise applications
To illustrate a case, the customer initially had a private cloud, essentially a data center hosted within it. They needed a disaster recovery solution, which would involve using a public cloud. This situation led to some deployment challenges due to the hybrid nature of their setup. However, once we implemented the solution for them, they were extremely satisfied. The process was not only effective but also quite speedy. To be more precise, we completed it in around 100 days, even though they initially requested it to be done in four months. They were very pleased with the efficiency of the implementation.
Daniel Ream - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable
I would highly recommend working closely with QuickBase and taking advantage of their subcontractors who specialize in building QuickBase apps. QuickBase does a great job of connecting potential users with these subcontractors. However, I would also advise tempering expectations and being aware that building and customizing applications in QuickBase takes time. It is a user-driven platform, so it requires investment and effort to create meaningful solutions. I would rate QuickBase a ten out of ten. I believe that if implemented properly, QuickBase can provide immense value to any organization. It can be used for various purposes such as managing purchase orders, tracking change orders, and monitoring project metrics. By using QuickBase as a central hub, it becomes a reliable and trustworthy source for project-related information. This ability to consolidate and organize data makes it an invaluable tool. Moreover, any solution that helps transform information from individual knowledge into a structured database is undoubtedly a worthwhile investment.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
30%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
76%
Computer Software Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?
I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work be...
Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?
Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ...
Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in...
Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into t...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applic...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing ...
What do you like most about QuickBase?
The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?
Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the p...
What needs improvement with QuickBase?
The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to...
 

Also Known As

PowerApps, MS PowerApps
No data available
Quick Base, TSheets
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra
Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ServiceNow, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: March 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.