Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Teams vs Zoho Cliq comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
163
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (4th)
Zoho Cliq
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 11.8%, down from 19.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zoho Cliq is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Santhosh Varghese - PeerSpot reviewer
Whiteboard and content sharing features are good
I would rate Teams's stability as a nine out of ten. However, some recent updates have made it less stable. I find it a little bit choppy. Sometimes, I find the network quality is not very good with low bandwidth. So, sometimes, when you have low bandwidth the quality becomes very poor. So, you have to optimize your usage.
Anand Bala - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides ease of communication and is a stable solution
We use the solution for our organization's internal and commercial communications The solution's most valuable feature is the ease of communication. We can schedule meetings without any network interruptions. It works fine on lower networks as well. They should reduce data consumption and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The installation is very, very easy."
"The tool's integration capabilities are seamless."
"Microsoft Teams is a friendly and easy-to-install solution."
"Sharing screens is valuable."
"File sharing is the most valuable feature."
"It is easy to share and collaborate, including built-in, edit-in-place, autosave features, without having to download, edit, save, or upload."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that I can attach files in any format."
"Our company is moving from their Skype for Business to Teams. So I've seen it, I've looked at it, I've used it somewhat enjoyed the UI."
"It works fine on lower networks as well."
 

Cons

"The tool's AI feature works well for English. However, it should also work for other languages, such as Vietnamese."
"Microsoft Teams is quite demanding on bandwidth, which has been a problem during the COVID situation because we don't get enterprise-class bandwidth at home."
"It's not as easy to augment your meetings as it is with competitors. For example, in Zoom, if I want to add attendees, I just grab the meeting link and post it to them. With Teams, how to do this is not as clear."
"They could enhance the product's stability and integration features."
"The future scalability can include the integration of planners, project management tools, SharePoint, and more applications that are used."
"The solution needs to integrate ChatGPT so that the solution can summarize the meetings. The solution needs integration with AI. Copilot is already in the pipeline."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"At times, we encounter difficulties with remote access through Teams, which requires improvement."
"They should reduce data consumption and improve network connection for video calls."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is affordable."
"The solution's pricing is average."
"If you have clients who do not have a computer and are joining with their phones it's an additional fee of $5.00 per user."
"The product is expensive."
"Pricing is free to a threshold and then after that you have to license per user."
"Microsoft Teams is priced less than other solutions, such as Bridge."
"I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten. Its pricing is fixed."
"Microsoft Teams is a cheap solution because it's included in the Microsoft 365 suite."
"It is a cost-efficient solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
73%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
3%
Computer Software Company
3%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
I’m unsure about the exact cost, but I believe it’s reasonable. Using Teams for collaboration, video conferencing, and messaging helps save costs, especially for communicating with third-party comp...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
Improvements could be made in utilizing AI features, such as getting a transcript of meetings. During my usage, there were no AI features available.
What do you like most about Zoho Cliq?
It works fine on lower networks as well.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zoho Cliq?
The solution is cost-efficient. Also, it offers a few free trials to explore different features.
What needs improvement with Zoho Cliq?
They should reduce data consumption and improve network connection for video calls. Also, they should add a feature for video messaging.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

MS Teams
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
GameVision, CRCC Asia, Purolite, FundsIndia, GPSS, europebet
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: January 2025.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.