No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Teams vs Zoho Cliq comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
178
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (4th)
Zoho Cliq
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
24th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 7.1%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zoho Cliq is 1.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Teams7.1%
Zoho Cliq1.5%
Other91.4%
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Anna Virtsan - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Project Manager at UkrSibbank
Have streamlined daily workflow and task management but still face inconvenience from recent interface changes and limited integration options
There are challenges and issues in Microsoft Teams, such as after recent updates where group chats were combined with Teams, chats, and groups into one. Users have to work with settings to make it normal again so Teams are separated from chats, and that was a really inconvenient update. Many users ask me to help make it back again to separate Teams and groups from one-to-one chats. That's probably the worst update they've made recently. Additionally, there are some minor features, such as when I work with messages, I don't have an actual forward or quote option when replying to someone's message. I need to be careful not to miss the quote sign. For a lot of people, they are confused about where the quotes option is. I've received a couple of hundred support tickets just regarding this issue. The function to share email to Teams chat doesn't work sometimes due to our compliance policies, and sometimes it would be nice to be able to forward an email to the group chat and have further discussions. Microsoft Teams could improve by being less glitchy because it glitches a lot, leading to undelivered emails and undelivered messages. It would be beneficial if the MS application Shifts, which adds functionality to groups, could be integrated into the groups calendar. Currently, many teams don't use the app because it is not integrated with the general calendar or the Outlook calendar, making it basically a useless application. The platform needs less Copilot and more people. The general Copilot integration into the platform is less glitchy, but Microsoft Teams is quite heavy and glitchy sometimes. Stability depends a lot on compliance restrictions, policies, and quality of internet. Sometimes, when updates are enrolling, the platform glitches, breaks, or shuts down.
Anand Bala - PeerSpot reviewer
Reaserch Analyst at Zreya Wealth
Provides ease of communication and is a stable solution
We use the solution for our organization's internal and commercial communications The solution's most valuable feature is the ease of communication. We can schedule meetings without any network interruptions. It works fine on lower networks as well. They should reduce data consumption and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Microsoft has delivered integrated tools and collaborative capabilities that continue to strengthen and bring great value to Teams."
"The tool's integration with OneNote and Power BI is good. The current version of Microsoft Teams is significantly more user-friendly compared to previous versions. I find it easy to handle any user needs and provide assistance. The device installation process is straightforward, and configuring it for users is not complicated. This seamless and user-friendly experience makes it easy to connect with everyone."
"File sharing is the most valuable feature."
"The tool is available on cell phones. It can be used in calls and meetings."
"The product is continually growing to add new features and functionality."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is its video calling feature which makes it easier to work on the solution."
"Microsoft Teams combines most of the Office 365 products in one very convenient product."
"I have participated in meetings with up to 500 people during all-team meetings, and it worked without any issues."
"It works fine on lower networks as well."
 

Cons

"The remote control needs some improvement."
"I would like to see Outlook options added to this solution."
"What I'd like to improve in Microsoft Teams are the calendar management and task management tools, because they're not easy to use. They're not user-friendly."
"I think the solution would be improved by giving people the ability to call into meetings."
"I'd like Microsoft to start adding more AI functionality into Teams."
"Adding and integrating more apps like SharePoint on Microsoft Teams is making the solution very slow."
"Microsoft Teams could improve the integration with Outlook because most of us are not using the last version of Outlook and it causes some issues."
"The solution should fix the ease of use directly outside of the office environment. Right now, unless I'm at my office desktop, it's hard to access it."
"They should reduce data consumption and improve network connection for video calls."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't think the solution is as expensive as big Webex licenses. It doesn't usually offer one-on-one licenses, so it's hard to compare. It's more expensive than the Google equivalent, but you can't replace Microsoft Teams with Google's offering."
"Microsoft Teams comes with a yearly subscription, which is not very expensive."
"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."
"We have a license for the solution."
"You don't buy only the Teams license; you buy it as part of the Microsoft 365 bundle."
"In our experience, pricing may differ from country to country, with some regions offering more favorable rates due to local payment arrangements."
"I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for its pricing."
"The solution is part of enterprise Microsoft 365 licensing."
"It is a cost-efficient solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
892,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Construction Company
9%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business66
Midsize Enterprise45
Large Enterprise72
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Microsoft Teams is good and fine.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
Microsoft Teams already comes with rich qualities, and the impact on the IT professional is very large with great features in terms of collaboration, team activity engagements, and friendly emojis ...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Teams?
My main use case for Microsoft Teams is team communications and collaborations, and sharing updates. For any task, we use Microsoft Teams. We share the specific builds for the distributions, and if...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

MS Teams
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
GameVision, CRCC Asia, Purolite, FundsIndia, GPSS, europebet
Find out what your peers are saying about Slack, Microsoft, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2026.
892,678 professionals have used our research since 2012.