Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Cloud Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers responsive support with varying service levels, but documentation and response times need improvement.
Sentiment score
5.6
SAP Cloud Platform's customer service is praised for quick support but criticized for delays and time zone challenges.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.2
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform requires improved error handling, scalability, support, integration options, and enhanced performance, security, and pricing flexibility.
Sentiment score
3.9
SAP Cloud Platform needs UI consistency, better connectivity, improved performance, licensing clarity, user guidance, and integration flexibility enhancements.
MuleSoft is considered expensive, so pricing is a major concern.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is highly scalable and suited for enterprises, but requires investment for optimal performance and integration.
Sentiment score
5.6
SAP Cloud Platform offers scalable solutions for enterprises, simplifying infrastructure management with positive user feedback on integration capabilities.
MuleSoft provides the ability to scale, yet it is costly to do so.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.8
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's high pricing challenges small businesses despite benefits, though a pay-as-you-go model may improve accessibility.
No sentiment score available
SAP Cloud Platform's flexible pricing reflects its high-quality ERP capabilities but may be costly for small businesses.
MuleSoft is considered one of the more expensive products in the market.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is stable and reliable, but connector issues and external factors may affect its consistency.
Sentiment score
4.3
SAP Cloud Platform is praised for stability, though frequent updates and occasional AWS instability are noted by users.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.1
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform excels in API management, offering easy integration, visual design, scalability, and seamless microservices support.
No sentiment score available
SAP Cloud Platform enhances remote work with integration, scalability, secure management, AI-based flexibility, and comprehensive ERP capabilities.
The most valuable feature is the full lifecycle management, including Anypoint Designer and Exchange, as well as Discofolio API.
 

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (9th), Cloud Data Integration (4th)
SAP Cloud Platform
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 14.1%, down from 16.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Cloud Platform is 10.4%, up from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Corydon Hinton - PeerSpot reviewer
Can seamlessly translate protocols and produce fairly quick results
Using the solution was great. It was part of the project that we didn't worry that much about. What I also liked about it was that even though I'm not that technical, I could go in and look at thoughts and events and confirm that the information we were looking for was making it across. I could check at the interface level and lessen the burden on validation within the application. The instrumentation within the solution is important. The ease of implementation is very important. Our partner development team had little trouble dealing with these diverse systems, with JSON on the one hand and SOAP on the other. The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great. The API-led connectivity is great. The reason that we took on the product was that we wanted to learn about it. We wanted to figure out how to use it. A big payoff for this will be in EHR integrations. These systems are all alike, yet they are all different. They all use EPIC, and each installation is a little bit different. It’s a challenge when we go to different hospitals. MuleSoft has made a name for itself in using the integrations.
Taiwo Babalola - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development
The main area that requires improvement in the SAP Cloud Platform, specifically within BTP, is cost management and application stability. We also face challenges with load balancing and other related issues. Currently, we leverage the review of business applications and data usage within our organization. CTI has proven to be an excellent choice for integration, making it seamless and reducing the complexity of various integration scenarios. However, the major area that needs improvement is the development model for custom applications on BTP. SAP has introduced a low-code model that enables application development with less coding and more focus on data and visual building. However, migrating existing applications from traditional coding methods, such as HTML or other programming languages, to the low-code model is not straightforward. It is time-consuming and involves reviewing the application model, which may discourage businesses from investing in this transition. Additionally, there are various requirements and layouts that need to be considered, which further complicates the process. Many businesses are hesitant to invest in this area as it involves significant effort and may result in data loss, especially when personnel change within the organization before requirements are provided. It's an area that requires attention. It becomes challenging for developers to understand the business logic and requirements, making it difficult for the team to work on application migration and transition. Moreover, SAP has released a publication regarding the migration to VMware Cloud, and compatibility issues have arisen. This affects the seamless migration that SAP promotes, as there are thousands of objects that are not compatible with NetCloud. These objects are critical to the business, and without them, the transition cannot be successful. Technical complexities and the difficulty of migrating one application to another create significant obstacles. Businesses lose interest in such migrations due to the time and technicality involved. While the technical team understands the complexities, the business side is primarily concerned with using new features and staying up-to-date. This discrepancy becomes a major bottleneck, making the transition from one location to another extremely complex.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?
I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?
This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...
Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?
One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...
How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS?
How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS? Amazon AWS offers options both in terms of upgrading and expanding capabilities as well as acquiring greater storage space. These upgrades can ...
What do you like most about SAP Cloud Platform?
The product improved our company's business operations since we got value out of it.
 

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ
SAP HANA Cloud Platform
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Siemens, Shell & Volkswagen, Still, EarlySense, Roche, National Football League, Heidelberg University Hospital, In Mind Computing, The Timken Company, OPAL, EnterpriseJungle, Groupe Danone, Accenture, T-Systems, Sailing Team Germany, Sloan Valve
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Cloud Platform and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.