N-able MSP Manager vs ServiceNow comparison

Read 228 ServiceNow reviews

27,454 Views
10,433 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

N-able MSP Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

ServiceNow and N-able MSP Manager cater to IT service management and managed service provider sectors. ServiceNow stands out for its versatility, while N-able MSP Manager is preferred for MSP-focused tasks due to its specialized features.

Features: ServiceNow is known for workflow automation, advanced analytics, and integration capabilities. It supports various enterprise processes. N-able MSP Manager includes features like automated ticketing, integrated billing, and RMM integrations tailored for MSPs.

Room for Improvement: ServiceNow could enhance its ease of use and simplify the setup process. It might also offer more cost-effective solutions for smaller enterprises. N-able MSP Manager can expand its analytics capabilities and offer more flexible integration options. Improving its scalability for larger enterprises would be beneficial too.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ServiceNow involves a complex setup suitable for large organizations and offers multi-channel customer service. N-able MSP Manager is cloud-based, allowing quick deployment for small to mid-sized providers with efficient, rapid support service.

Pricing and ROI: ServiceNow requires a significant initial investment, offering substantial ROI for large enterprises. N-able MSP Manager is more cost-effective for MSPs with lower setup costs and quicker ROI due to its focused operations.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able MSP Manager vs. ServiceNow Report (Updated: April 2026).

N-able MSP Manager vs. ServiceNow

Download the complete report

Helped 890,124 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able MSP Manager

Ranking in Help Desk Software

24th

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ServiceNow

Ranking in Help Desk Software

1st

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

228

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (2nd), No-Code Development Platforms (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category, the mindshare of N-able MSP Manager is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow is 14.9%, down from 24.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Service Management (ITSM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ServiceNow	14.9%
N-able MSP Manager	1.4%
Other	83.7%

IT Service Management (ITSM)

Featured Reviews

GeorgeKanellopoulos

CTO at InTTrust SA

Ticketing has helped prioritize support tasks while contract and project management have required better integration and pricing flexibility

I don't know if N-able MSP Manager could have some additional features in the future to make it more competitive because it might already be available and I'm not aware of it.I cannot say that N-able MSP Manager dashboard is intuitive, but I don't see any big difference with ManageEngine. From the deployment perspective with N-able MSP Manager, I cannot have higher expectations because it is a SaaS solution, so it was deployed as is from the technical perspective. From the business perspective, the deployment is complex, but I cannot tell you that it is less complex than ManageEngine. The main reason that made me change my mind and proceed with ManageEngine is the availability of add-ons in combination with their pricing.

Read full review

Hemanthreddy Vakiti

Data engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Structured workflows have improved SLA compliance and now support prioritized incident handling

I think the licensing and pricing of ServiceNow is quite expensive compared to other tools. For large organizations, it is acceptable, but specifically for small and medium organizations to track incidents or change requests, ServiceNow is quite expensive. Sometimes performance can be slow when workflows and integrations are configured for complex tasks. For advanced customizations or advanced features which we rarely use, the documentation is not up to standard. The documentation needs to be improved for advanced customization features. However, the platform is stable overall and the features are quite good. The user experience and performance concerns I mentioned are areas I want to be improved. When many workflows and interactions are configured, performance is slow. For the features it is providing, it is quite expensive. If these performance features are improved, we can easily pay that price and get the return on investment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Don't get scared of the price tag because it's definitely worth it."

"We are an MSP, and for what we do, we have one centralized dashboard, and even though we're a small IT team, we can manage a ton of clients with a lot of automated processes, even for patch management."

"The best advantage for us, since we use all N-able products, is that the MSP portal centralizes everything."

"I like that you can do all the things with it. You can patch, and you can run the scheduled tasks. You can remote in, upload files, and download files. You can log onto a computer PowerShell, or command prompt, without having to log into RDP. I also like its ease of use."

"I am impressed with the tool's integration with our mail system."

"This is a premier product and it has been around for a long time."

"At a significantly lower price, I managed to get project management modules, contract management, and CMDB, which were not all available in N-able MSP Manager."

"Other perks include the Visual Task Boards and the Virtual Agent."

"It's filling a niche I think a lot of people have really, really wanted which is bringing a lot of this information into one central location."

"It's more about the ease of use of ServiceNow. Plus, everything is there in a single platform. If you need any additional functionality, you just need to enable the plugins without even installing anything on the servers"

"Identifies better ways to license software or eliminate unused software to save money."

"The solution is very easy to use; now that I've worked with it a little bit, I can find what I need rather quickly, and it was pretty easy to implement the solution."

"I have used other products and switched because of the ease of use of ServiceNow, and the functionality of it."

"It uses a common base of data and allows different types of records to pull from that same base of data."

"We used BMC Remedy, and it was slightly different but we went for ServiceNow because it is more user oriented."

More ServiceNow pros

Cons

"Comparing the pricing of N-able MSP Manager to ManageEngine, it is a little bit too high."

"I'd like to see a way to import contacts in bulk using an Excel sheet or another import method."

"There are too many products out there. What I would like to see is a simplified solution that is packaged better, where you can easily implement or turn on the functionality that you need."

"Its reporting is lousy and bad. It is not as good as it should be."

"Its reporting is lousy and bad. It is not as good as it should be. There is too much work involved to get what you want. Most times, you have to call them to customize some stuff. I just don't like that part. They need to work on their reporting. They have a way to go."

"The tool needs to improve its customization of the user interface."

"What I would like to see is a simplified solution that is packaged better, where you can easily implement or turn on the functionality that you need."

"I don't know where that's going to end because at some point ServiceNow will become a marlock and people will turn away from a 'one solution fits all' and go more into the niches again."

"I would say there is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to technical support."

"The customization that we are doing for the needs of our organization are difficult to do and could be improved."

"A duplicate ticket option should be enabled - this feature can help to take the same information from a close incident thus decreasing manual time."

"I would like to see Advanced Intelligent Automation."

"The asset management application could be improved. They have a lot of the infrastructure built, but it does not come with already made compatibility with some of the most popular vendors, such as Cisco and Microsoft. You have to fix it yourself."

"Local solutions have lower costs."

"The visuals are the one area where there is opportunity for improvement."

More ServiceNow cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't know the exact cost, but I know it's reasonable. Its cost of entry is not bad. I've had other organizations sign up for it. I don't know how much they paid, but it wasn't bad. You charge for every object. You charge for AV, and you charge for servers. There is a charge for everything or every object in that. I know we make money from it, but I don't know what it is."

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten since it's not the cheapest one in the market."

"Don't get scared of the price tag because it's definitely worth it."

"I have found the solution very expensive."

"The licensing cost is based on your partnership with ServiceNow and what you have selected for implementation. There is an annual license cost which is calculated based on your number of devices."

"The license model is based on a number of fulfillers (active users who play some role within the ServiceNow functionality). Therefore, you can serve as many end-users as you want, without additional costs."

"I know that it's not too bad because people continue to use it and they are happy to renew up their contract."

"They could be more competitive with their licensing."

"$230 per user."

"There are licensing fees."

"The solution is priced for medium to enterprises sized businesses. However, it is expensive compared to competitors."

More ServiceNow pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

890,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

18%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	55
Midsize Enterprise	35
Large Enterprise	171

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able MSP Manager?

What is your primary use case for N-able MSP Manager?

I am deploying it for my company.I inherited an implementation with N-able MSP Manager that was not quite good. I faced problems managing the contracts, translating them into technical topics, and ...

What advice do you have for others considering N-able MSP Manager?

I use N-able MSP Manager ticketing system.It has helped to prioritize tasks. At the level that I am aware of the product capabilities in N-able MSP Manager, I can't say that the centralized custome...

Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?

The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...

Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?

Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...

What do you like most about ServiceNow?

The solution has a user-friendly interface.

JIRA Service Management vs N-able MSP Manager

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

TeamSupport vs N-able MSP Manager

Compared 8% of the time

SysAid vs N-able MSP Manager

Compared 6% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs N-able MSP Manager

Compared 6% of the time

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus vs N-able MSP Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More N-able MSP Manager Competitors

BMC Helix ITSM vs ServiceNow

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Maximo vs ServiceNow

Compared 5% of the time

Zendesk vs ServiceNow

Compared 4% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs ServiceNow

Compared 4% of the time

Freshservice vs ServiceNow

Compared 3% of the time

More ServiceNow Competitors

Product Reports

N-able MSP Manager

Download N-able MSP Manager product report

Download ServiceNow product report

Also Known As

SolarWinds LOGICnow, SolarWinds MSP Manager

No data available

Overview

N-able MSP Manager provides centralized tool integration and ticket management, improving remote access, task scheduling, and file transfers. Features like real-time reporting and Passportal integration enhance performance for MSPs.

N-able MSP Manager supports Managed Service Providers with remote management, patch management, encryption, and network monitoring. It seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems such as RMM Insight and N-central. The SaaS platform ensures automatic updates, and features like automatic ticket creation and time-tracking optimize operations. Some challenges include reporting, agent deployment via Group Policy, and improving customization, particularly in Microsoft environments.

What are the key features of N-able MSP Manager?

Centralized Portal: Enables seamless tool integration and efficient ticket management.
Remote Access: Facilitates easy task scheduling and file transfers without RDP logins.
Real-Time Reporting: Offers network reporting with multi-tenant capability for better decision-making.
Customizable SLAs: Enhances service management tailored to client needs.
Passportal Integration: Provides quick and secure credential access.

What should users evaluate in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Look for improvements in remote management and integration ease.
Cost-Benefit: Assess functionality versus cost compared to alternatives.
SaaS Advantages: Continuous updates and support without manual intervention.
Task Optimization: Review features like time-tracking and task assignment accuracy.

N-able MSP Manager is often implemented in industries requiring robust remote management and network monitoring. Managed Service Providers leverage its integration capabilities for streamlined operations, while sectors needing complex contract management might encounter translation challenges in technical implementations.

N-able

ServiceNow offers customizability and cloud-based integration that sustains operational efficiency. Enabling change and incident management, it accelerates workflow automation and project management without downtime issues, serving deployment needs for IT service and productivity enhancements.

ServiceNow stands out with its adaptable workflows and cloud-native infrastructure, boosting IT service, project, and asset management. Known for its robust incident and change management, the platform addresses business needs through its user-centric design and extensive integration options. By facilitating seamless IT operations and automation, ServiceNow empowers businesses to enhance productivity and efficiency. Regular updates ensure users benefit from the latest features without service interruptions, although pricing and licensing complexities demand attention. Users seek improved reporting tools and a more intuitive design while expressing interest in refined mobile functionality and better documentation.

What are the key features of ServiceNow?

Customizability: Enables tailored workflows to align with business processes.
Cloud-Based Integration: Allows seamless updates and operational sustainability.
Incident and Change Management: Supports efficient handling of IT-related issues.
Automation Capabilities: Automates repetitive tasks, enhancing productivity.
User-Friendly Design: Simplifies navigation and improves user interaction.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides detailed insights for better decision-making.

What benefits and ROI should users anticipate from ServiceNow?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines processes and reduces manual efforts.
Enhanced Productivity: Automates tasks, enabling focus on strategic initiatives.
Seamless Operations: Integrates across departments for unified management.
Effective IT Management: Smooth incident, change, and problem resolution.
Cost and Time Savings: Reduces operational costs through efficient workflow management.

ServiceNow finds implementation across industries like IT, HR, asset management, and help desks, addressing ticketing and configuration needs. Businesses use its dashboard for tracking performance metrics, enhancing decision-making in departments like HR service delivery. Its adaptability also makes it suitable for industries requiring robust operational management and process automation, driving efficiency and growth.

Sample Customers

Longleaf Systems, ITproMedia, Choice Technology, Halski Systems, Allixo Technologies, Nettech, Concept Technology

AAA, AstraZeneca, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Broadcom, Christus Health, Epicor, Equinix, GE Capital, Intuit, KPMG, Loyola Marymount University, OshKosh, Quantas, RedHat, Royal Bank of Scotland, Swiss Re, U.S. Department of Energy, Safeway, Yale University, and Zillow

N-able MSP Manager vs. ServiceNow