OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs PractiTest comparison

OpenText and PractiTest are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2, while PractiTest is ranked #21. OpenText holds a 5.7% mindshare in ALM, compared to PractiTest’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PractiTest users who would recommend it.

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Read 203 OpenText ALM / Quality Center reviews

7,554 Views
3,152 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

204 Views
157 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

PractiTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

OpenText ALM / Quality Center and PractiTest are two popular solutions for application lifecycle management and quality management. PractiTest has the upper hand due to its modern features and positive user reviews.

Features: OpenText ALM / Quality Center is praised for its comprehensive defect tracking, integration capabilities, and robust reporting tools. PractiTest offers strong test management, enhanced reporting functionalities, and a modern, customizable interface that users find more valuable.

Room for Improvement: Users pinpoint that OpenText ALM / Quality Center could benefit from an updated design, improved performance speed, and better user interface. PractiTest users suggest enhancements in automation capabilities, integration options, and additional reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM / Quality Center deployment process can be complex, requiring significant setup time. PractiTest is highlighted for its straightforward deployment and excellent customer support, with reliable assistance and quick response times.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM / Quality Center's setup costs can be high, and its ROI is mixed based on user reviews. PractiTest offers competitive pricing with a quicker return on investment according to user feedback, making its pricing model more attractive for cost-conscious tech buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,763 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

5th

Ranking in Test Management Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

203

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PractiTest

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

21st

Ranking in Test Management Tools

16th

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText ALM / Quality Center is 5.7%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PractiTest is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Aug 1, 2023

Offers features for higher-end traceability and integration with different tools but lacks in scalability

We used Quality Center for test case management. We wrote and uploaded test cases into it, and we also executed them manually. We could track the results of the test cases, and we could also track the defects that were found. We also used it for higher-end requirements management and traceability…

Read full review

Nirmal Kumar Chaturvedi

Senior Software QA Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Aug 29, 2017

Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization

Integration with other platforms, Test Set schedule, custom filters, requirements linking with the test case, and the Dashboard are the most valuable features of this product. Just one click on the Dashboard and we get all reports in graphical format. Dashboards and reports are very customizable and the ability to share metrics with other colleagues is a great feature. Custom filters are really a big advantage of PractiTest. We have hundreds of tests and test sets that we can arrange properly and easily thanks to this tool. In addition, PractiTest offers a good reporting module and integration with other platforms such as JIRA, which we use daily. Advanced customization allows us to customize the tool's settings in accordance with all our needs. We integrated PractiTest with Pivotal Tracker and it allowed us to have everything synced on two systems and to make our testing process more professional.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a tool, and it works. It has got good linkage and good traceability between the test cases and the defects. It has got lots of features for testing."

"It provides visibility on release status and readiness."

"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is a very good test management tool especially for writing test cases and uploading. You can even upload the test cycles from Excel. You get the defects and the reports, and also some automation using EFT which works with ALM."

"Quality management, project management from a QA perspective - testing, defect management, how testing relates back to requirements."

"From reporting to team management, everything is better now."

"We can get an entire project into a single repository where we can view all the data in detail. This is where we keep all our test cases where everyone can reference them. This provides everyone access to the test cases and artifacts via the cloud. There is no need to contact anyone."

"Test Execution (Test Lab): This allows us to track our manual tests with date and time and enter actual results and screenshots."

"It's basically the way to show the work that we do as QA testers, and to have a historical view of those executions."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

Cons

"Lacks sufficient plug-ins."

"Currently, what's missing in the solution is the ability for users to see the ongoing scenarios and the status of those scenarios versus the requirements. As for the management tools, they also need to be improved so users can have a better idea of what's going on in just one look, so they can manage testing activities better."

"The downside is that the Quality Center's only been available on Windows for years, but not on Mac."

"The solution's reporting could be improved."

"Quality Center's ability to connect all the different projects to reflect status and progress is quite complicated. We may develop something because there are so many projects. Right now, I have to do something which Quality Center is really not designed for: over reporting. This is a very big problem right now. We may develop some controls, but it is problem at the moment. I love Quality Center for individual projects to work with it. However, if you have a lot of projects for Quality Manager to do cross reporting on many projects, then it's almost impossible. It takes a lot of time."

"I would like to be able to search easier, not just do SQL queries, being able to do free keyword searches on the data. That's valuable."

"The QA needs improvement."

"HP-QC does not support Agile. It is designed for Waterfall. This is the number one issue that we're facing right now, which is why we want to look for another tool. We're a pharmaceutical services company, so we require electronic signatures in a tool, but this functionality isn't available in HP-QC. We don't have 21 CFR, Part 11, electronic signatures, and we need compliant electronic signatures. Some of the ALM tools can toggle between tabular format and document format for requirements, but the same feature is not available in this solution. There is also no concept of base-lining or versioning. It doesn't exist."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is expensive nowadays."

"It's a perpetual license."

"For pricing, I recommend to buy a bundled package. Check the HPE site for more details."

"The solution is priceed high."

"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is very expensive."

"Pricing could be improved as it's high-priced. I don't exactly know the pricing point, but previously, I know that it was really high so less people were able to use it for their projects."

"The enterprise pricing and licensing are reasonable."

"Pricing is managed by our headquarters. I am able to get from them for very cheap. The market price is horribly expensive."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

61%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The pricing is quite high. We pay around $30,000 for thirty users, translating to approximately $6,000 to $10,000 per user, which is high. X-ray for Jira is cheaper at around $10,000 a year for fiv...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The solution is not browser-based, which modern users prefer. The synchronizer tool to sync with Jira is not maintained, and it doesn't support the required encryption levels for passwords, which c...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 25% of the time

OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 22% of the time

Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 29% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 27% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 23% of the time

TestRail vs PractiTest

Compared 21% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

October 2024

Download OpenText ALM / Quality Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

October 2024

Download PractiTest product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

PractiTest

Overview

OpenText ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps you govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest

October 2024

Free Report: OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.