OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs PractiTest comparison

OpenText and PractiTest are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1, while PractiTest is ranked #21. OpenText holds a 5.7% mindshare in ALM, compared to PractiTest’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PractiTest users who would recommend it.

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Read 205 OpenText ALM / Quality Center reviews

7,225 Views
2,979 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

PractiTest

Read 7 PractiTest reviews

195 Views
149 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

PractiTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

OpenText ALM / Quality Center and PractiTest are two popular solutions for application lifecycle management and quality management. PractiTest has the upper hand due to its modern features and positive user reviews.

Features: OpenText ALM / Quality Center is praised for its comprehensive defect tracking, integration capabilities, and robust reporting tools. PractiTest offers strong test management, enhanced reporting functionalities, and a modern, customizable interface that users find more valuable.

Room for Improvement: Users pinpoint that OpenText ALM / Quality Center could benefit from an updated design, improved performance speed, and better user interface. PractiTest users suggest enhancements in automation capabilities, integration options, and additional reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM / Quality Center deployment process can be complex, requiring significant setup time. PractiTest is highlighted for its straightforward deployment and excellent customer support, with reliable assistance and quick response times.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM / Quality Center's setup costs can be high, and its ROI is mixed based on user reviews. PractiTest offers competitive pricing with a quicker return on investment according to user feedback, making its pricing model more attractive for cost-conscious tech buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,168 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

5th

Ranking in Test Management Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

205

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PractiTest

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

21st

Ranking in Test Management Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText ALM / Quality Center is 5.7%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PractiTest is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Has an initial setup phase that is easy to manage

The tool has some limitations for the dashboard, especially when it comes to 20 or 25 of them, which is sometimes not enough, and one may have to use a custom Excel to help extend the dashboard. The tool needs improvements since it is an old technology. OpenText ALM / Quality Center's improved version is ALM Octane but it does not support some of the traditional parts of the original product. Some of the traditional parts are missing in a lot of areas of OpenText ALM / Quality Center. It is difficult to directly transfer OpenText ALM / Quality Center to ALM Octane. Some of the classic OEMs have limitations, especially when used in an IDE network. There is a need for the tool to check where changes in UI or UX need to be made. The technology used for UI and UX are not user-friendly.

Read full review

Nirmal Kumar Chaturvedi

Senior Software QA Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization

Integration with other platforms, Test Set schedule, custom filters, requirements linking with the test case, and the Dashboard are the most valuable features of this product. Just one click on the Dashboard and we get all reports in graphical format. Dashboards and reports are very customizable and the ability to share metrics with other colleagues is a great feature. Custom filters are really a big advantage of PractiTest. We have hundreds of tests and test sets that we can arrange properly and easily thanks to this tool. In addition, PractiTest offers a good reporting module and integration with other platforms such as JIRA, which we use daily. Advanced customization allows us to customize the tool's settings in accordance with all our needs. We integrated PractiTest with Pivotal Tracker and it allowed us to have everything synced on two systems and to make our testing process more professional.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can get an entire project into a single repository where we can view all the data in detail. This is where we keep all our test cases where everyone can reference them. This provides everyone access to the test cases and artifacts via the cloud. There is no need to contact anyone."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"OpenText ALM Quality Center is highly customizable."

"With test execution, you have an option to create custom fields. It is also really user-friendly. With other tools, we only have restricted fields and we cannot customize or add new columns or fields that users can make use of while testing. ALM is very flexible for creating new fields. It is easy for users to understand the application."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is its support for many automation technologies."

"ALM Quality Center's best features are the test lab, requirement tab, and report dashboard."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is the alignment of the test to the execution and the linking of the defects to the two. It automatically links any issues you have to the test."

"The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center pros

"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."

Cons

"Certain applications within this solution are not really compatible with certain applications like ERP. The problem is when we're trying to use these applications or devices, the solution itself doesn't scale."

"An area for improvement in Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is not being able to update the Excel sheet where I wrote the test cases. Whenever I update some test cases, I'm unsuccessful because there is overlapping data or missing cases from the sheet."

"Micro Focus is an expensive tool."

"The technology used for UI and UX are not user-friendly."

"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center could improve how the automation process works. Addiotnlally, the parallel execution needs to be optimized. For example, if multiple users, which are two or more users, are doing an execution, while we execute the cases, I have seen some issues in the progress."

"Only Internet Explorer is supported. That is a big problem. They don't support Chrome and Firefox and so on."

"Browser support needs improvement. Currently, it can only run on IE, Internet Explorer. It doesn't work on Firefox, doesn't work on Chrome, doesn't work on a Mac book. Those are the new technologies where most companies move towards. That's been outstanding for quite a while before it even became Micro Focus tools when it was still HP. Even before HP, that's always been an issue."

"The solution's reporting could be improved."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center cons

"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Sure, HP UFT is not free. But consider what you get for that cost: A stable product that is easy to use; the kitchen sink of technology stack support; decades of code (which in many cases actually is free); a version that is a stepping stone to an easier Selenium design; and a support base that is more that just the kindness of strangers."

"I'd rate the pricing as 3/10 as it's very expensive."

"ALM Quality Center is a little bit costly."

"It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily."

"It all comes down to how many people are going to access the tool. When teams go above 20, I think ALM is a better tool to use from a collaboration and streamlining perspective."

"For pricing, I recommend to buy a bundled package. Check the HPE site for more details."

"Seat and concurrent licensing models exist; the latter is recommended if a large number of different users will be utilizing the product."

"It is an expensive tool. I think one needs to pay 10,000 USD towards the perpetual licensing model."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is probably in the middle, it's not the cheapest but it's not the most expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

63%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The extract format is not ideal, splitting expected results into three line items, making interpretation difficult. Issues with mapping multiple functional test cases to one automated test case nee...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 22% of the time

Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 14% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest

Compared 37% of the time

Jira vs PractiTest

Compared 35% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest

Compared 28% of the time

More PractiTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

December 2024

Download OpenText ALM / Quality Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

November 2024

Download PractiTest product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

PractiTest

Overview

OpenText ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps you govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing.

Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
Release your products with confidence and control.

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest

November 2024

Free Report: OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.