Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs PractiTest comparison

OpenText and PractiTest are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2, while PractiTest is ranked #21. OpenText holds a 5.7% mindshare in ALM, compared to PractiTest’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PractiTest users who would recommend it.
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Read 205 OpenText ALM / Quality Center reviews
  • 7,554 Views
  • 3,152 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
PractiTest
Read 7 PractiTest reviews
  • 204 Views
  • 157 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

OpenText ALM / Quality Center and PractiTest are two popular solutions for application lifecycle management and quality management. PractiTest has the upper hand due to its modern features and positive user reviews.

Features: OpenText ALM / Quality Center is praised for its comprehensive defect tracking, integration capabilities, and robust reporting tools. PractiTest offers strong test management, enhanced reporting functionalities, and a modern, customizable interface that users find more valuable.

Room for Improvement: Users pinpoint that OpenText ALM / Quality Center could benefit from an updated design, improved performance speed, and better user interface. PractiTest users suggest enhancements in automation capabilities, integration options, and additional reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM / Quality Center deployment process can be complex, requiring significant setup time. PractiTest is highlighted for its straightforward deployment and excellent customer support, with reliable assistance and quick response times.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM / Quality Center's setup costs can be high, and its ROI is mixed based on user reviews. PractiTest offers competitive pricing with a quicker return on investment according to user feedback, making its pricing model more attractive for cost-conscious tech buyers.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,636 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText ALM customer service is inconsistent, with mixed reviews on response times, expertise, and overall service quality.
No sentiment score available
PractiTest is commended for its rapid, knowledgeable support, courteous service, and efficient onboarding process that ensures seamless user adaptation.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.6
OpenText ALM faces challenges with expensive licenses, outdated UI, limited integration, and performance issues, hindering usability and efficiency.
No sentiment score available
PractiTest needs better customization, integration, and reporting, and can be more intuitive with faster performance for large datasets.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the PractiTest report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText ALM/Quality Center scales well, with stable performance for large user bases, but licensing may affect scalability costs.
No sentiment score available
PractiTest excels in scalability, efficiency, and flexibility, integrating well with tools and workflows for teams of various sizes.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
OpenText ALM is costly, requiring careful evaluation and negotiation, but global license sharing and SaaS could reduce expenses.
No sentiment score available
<p>PractiTest's flexible pricing and features streamline QA processes, making it suitable for various budgets and large teams.</p>
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the PractiTest report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
OpenText ALM/Quality Center is stable and reliable, with minor issues often linked to network or hardware constraints.
No sentiment score available
PractiTest is praised for its stability, reliability, robust performance, easy maintenance, and seamless integration, ensuring efficient project workflows.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the PractiTest report
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
OpenText ALM/Quality Center provides comprehensive traceability, integration, scalability, and secure management for lifecycle, test cases, and defects.
No sentiment score available
PractiTest offers customizable dashboards, seamless tool integration, efficient test management, detailed reports, and intuitive design enhancing productivity and quality assurance.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It is beneficial for managing testing data and has integration with Excel.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the PractiTest report
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
5th
Ranking in Test Management Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PractiTest
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
21st
Ranking in Test Management Tools
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText ALM / Quality Center is 5.7%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PractiTest is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an initial setup phase that is easy to manage
The tool has some limitations for the dashboard, especially when it comes to 20 or 25 of them, which is sometimes not enough, and one may have to use a custom Excel to help extend the dashboard. The tool needs improvements since it is an old technology. OpenText ALM / Quality Center's improved version is ALM Octane but it does not support some of the traditional parts of the original product. Some of the traditional parts are missing in a lot of areas of OpenText ALM / Quality Center. It is difficult to directly transfer OpenText ALM / Quality Center to ALM Octane. Some of the classic OEMs have limitations, especially when used in an IDE network. There is a need for the tool to check where changes in UI or UX need to be made. The technology used for UI and UX are not user-friendly.
Read full review
NC
Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization
Integration with other platforms, Test Set schedule, custom filters, requirements linking with the test case, and the Dashboard are the most valuable features of this product. Just one click on the Dashboard and we get all reports in graphical format. Dashboards and reports are very customizable and the ability to share metrics with other colleagues is a great feature. Custom filters are really a big advantage of PractiTest. We have hundreds of tests and test sets that we can arrange properly and easily thanks to this tool. In addition, PractiTest offers a good reporting module and integration with other platforms such as JIRA, which we use daily. Advanced customization allows us to customize the tool's settings in accordance with all our needs. We integrated PractiTest with Pivotal Tracker and it allowed us to have everything synced on two systems and to make our testing process more professional.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
62%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
5%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Healthcare Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The cost is a bit high and this could be improved as there are new players with better pricing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
Costing is an area that needs improvement. It is a bit on the higher side and can be managed better as there are new players with better pricing. Aside from this, there are no other challenges and ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 24% of the time
OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 22% of the time
Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 15% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 9% of the time
OpenText UFT One vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
OpenText UFT One vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 5% of the time
More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Competitors
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PractiTest
Compared 28% of the time
Jira vs PractiTest Logo
Jira vs PractiTest
Compared 26% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest Logo
Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest
Compared 25% of the time
TestRail vs PractiTest Logo
TestRail vs PractiTest
Compared 21% of the time
More PractiTest Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
November 2024
OpenText ALM / Quality Center reportDownload OpenText ALM / Quality Center product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
November 2024
PractiTest reportDownload PractiTest product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM
No data available
 

Learn More

OpenText
PractiTest
 

Overview

OpenText ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps you govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
  • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
  • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
  • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
  • Release your products with confidence and control.


 

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest
November 2024
Free Report: OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. PractiTest report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.