Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText Application Quality Management are extensively used in testing and development environments. Visual Studio Test Professional seems to have an advantage with its extensive IDE integration and cost-effective community version, while OpenText offers robust test management capabilities with strong traceability.
Features: Visual Studio Test Professional offers seamless integration with Microsoft tools, a robust IDE, IntelliSense, and NuGet package management. It's highly suitable for .NET development. OpenText Application Quality Management focuses on comprehensive test management, strong traceability, linking test cases to requirements and defects.
Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional requires better stability and integration with databases. It faces challenges with resource usage and startup time. OpenText Application Quality Management could enhance its user interface and expand support for Chrome. Its pricing and limited agility support add constraints.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional can be deployed across various environments, including on-premises and cloud. OpenText Application Quality Management provides similar flexibility but offers limited cloud-based features. Customer service for both tools needs improvement, with Microsoft noted for slower responses and OpenText considered average.
Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional's free community edition is cost-effective for users, though enterprise pricing can be high. OpenText Application Quality Management is costly, with high licensing fees being a barrier for smaller companies. Both offer good ROI, but Visual Studio's community version delivers immediate value without cost.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
The price is expensive.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers extensive capabilities in test management, automation tool integration, and defect traceability, providing an efficient and user-friendly experience for tracking and managing testing workflows.
The platform supports test management by integrating with automation tools and managing the traceability of defects and requirements. It facilitates users with linking test cases to defects, uploading from Excel, and generating customizable reports, which enhances efficiency. Business Process Testing and requirement capturing for test cases further extend its capabilities. Users report concerns about its integration with other tools, particularly in DevOps and agile frameworks, as well as challenges with its complex interface and high cost. Improved integration, better browser compatibility, upgraded dashboards, and enhanced support for agile methodologies are recommended by many users.
What are the most important features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, organizations apply OpenText Application Quality Management for test management, planning, and automation. It is an essential tool for managing test scenarios, recording results, and supporting both manual and automated testing processes. This tool aids in regression testing, ensuring requirement traceability and acting as a repository for executing test cycles, thereby supporting robust quality assurance practices.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
