OpenText AppWorks vs WorkflowGen comparison

OpenText and WorkflowGen are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.7, while WorkflowGen is ranked #54. OpenText holds a 0.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to WorkflowGen’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WorkflowGen users who would recommend it.

OpenText AppWorks

Read 10 OpenText AppWorks reviews

343 Views
217 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WorkflowGen

Read 3 WorkflowGen reviews

140 Views
105 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText AppWorks

WorkflowGen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

WorkflowGen and OpenText AppWorks are competitive solutions in the business process management arena. WorkflowGen is preferred for its straightforward deployment process and cost-effectiveness, while OpenText AppWorks offers superior features that justify its higher price point.

Features: WorkflowGen features easy-to-use process automation capabilities and powerful workflow configuration without technical complexity. OpenText AppWorks offers robust integration capabilities, a flexible architecture enabling advanced customization and scalability, and demonstrates a more comprehensive approach to feature set versatility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WorkflowGen is noted for its simpler deployment process, allowing businesses to get up and running swiftly with minimal technical intervention. It also scores well in customer service with prompt, effective support. OpenText AppWorks requires a more technical setup but provides extensive resources and tools for deployment, making it better suited for organizations with complex integration needs.

Pricing and ROI: WorkflowGen provides a more budget-friendly solution with lower initial setup costs, making it attractive for small and medium enterprises seeking cost efficiency. Its return on investment is advantageous due to lower overhead expenses. OpenText AppWorks, with a higher setup cost, offers a significant ROI for businesses seeking extensive features and long-term scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText AppWorks vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AppWorks vs. WorkflowGen

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText AppWorks

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WorkflowGen

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

54th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (28th), Process Automation (40th), Rapid Application Development Software (37th), Low-Code Development Platforms (33rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText AppWorks is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks ( /products/opentext-appworks-reviews ) are the BPM ( /products/informatica-intelligent-data-management-cloud-idmc-reviews ) modules. There is the standard BPM ( /products/informatica-intelligent-data-management-cloud-idmc-reviews ) modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP ( /categories/erp ) system.

Read full review

Christopher Odonoghue

SAP Solution Lead at Johnson & Johnson

Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable

We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"Its customer support is reliable and easy to approach."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"The monitoring aspect is highly valuable, as it offers an exceptional capability to track every minute of action performed by a business user in the global context."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

"In terms of the scalability and the handling of complexity, the customers are satisfied, and we also have confidence in the solution to achieve whatever implementations are required."

More OpenText AppWorks pros

"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."

Cons

"The integration could improve."

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

"AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation."

"OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types."

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

"The crucial missing element is the archival function."

More OpenText AppWorks cons

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"The price is on the higher side."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText AppWorks?

We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenTex...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 20% of the time

Appian vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 20% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 16% of the time

OutSystems vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 12% of the time

More OpenText AppWorks Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AppWorks

March 2025

Download OpenText AppWorks product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

April 2025

Download WorkflowGen product report

Overview

OpenText Appworks. AppWorks is OpenText's Enterprise Application Development and Management platform. It allows you to quickly and easily build purpose-specific apps for the enterprise using the web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript. These apps can connect to the OpenText EIM Suite using RESTful API.

OpenText

Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.

Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.

Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.

Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.

Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.

WorkflowGen

Sample Customers

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AppWorks vs. WorkflowGen

April 2025

Free Report: OpenText AppWorks vs. WorkflowGen

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText AppWorks vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText AppWorks vs. WorkflowGen report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.