OpenText Content Manager vs SS&C Blue Prism comparison

OpenText and SS&C Technologies are both solutions in the Document Management Software category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while SS&C Technologies is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.7. OpenText holds a 11.0% mindshare in DMS, compared to SS&C Technologies’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SS&C Technologies users who would recommend it.

OpenText Content Manager

Read 23 OpenText Content Manager reviews

371 Views
218 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

SS&C Blue Prism

Read 3 SS&C Blue Prism reviews

25 Views
17 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

OpenText Content Manager

SS&C Blue Prism

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

OpenText Content Manager and SS&C Blue Prism compete in the enterprise content management and robotic process automation categories. OpenText Content Manager seems more favorable due to its ease of implementation and support, while SS&C Blue Prism offers superior automation features.

Features: OpenText Content Manager offers comprehensive document management, collaborative capabilities, and integration with various enterprise systems. SS&C Blue Prism provides strong robotic process automation tools with scalability for large-scale projects. The key distinction is OpenText’s focus on document-centric features, whereas SS&C emphasizes an automation-centric approach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Content Manager is known for straightforward deployment and robust customer support, which benefits businesses seeking quick integration with minimal disruption. SS&C Blue Prism delivers comprehensive deployment options focused on scalability, potentially requiring more extensive implementation. OpenText offers quicker time-to-value, whereas SS&C focuses on long-term scalability.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Content Manager generally presents a competitive setup cost, providing satisfactory ROI due to simpler deployment. SS&C Blue Prism may involve higher initial expenses linked to its extensive automation capabilities, promising higher potential ROI for large-scale automation adoption, balancing affordability with automation investment.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Content Manager vs. SS&C Blue Prism Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Content Manager vs. SS&C Blue Prism

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Content Manager

Ranking in Document Management Software

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (7th), File Archiving (4th)

SS&C Blue Prism

Ranking in Document Management Software

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (21st), Business Process Management (BPM) (34th), Process Automation (26th), Medical Insurance Claims Software (3rd), Insurance Claims Processing (5th), Low-Code Development Platforms (25th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (16th), Loan Management Software (2nd), Document Automation Software (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Document Management Software category, the mindshare of OpenText Content Manager is 11.0%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SS&C Blue Prism is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Document Management Software

Featured Reviews

Maurice Riverso

Records Management Officer at ANZPAA

Our our official repository and it has disposal management and retention management

The security architecture is the only problem as it's a little bit complex and too torturous at times. So it could be improved a little bit, but it is regarded as a very good system in Australia. It's probably overly subscribed. Also, what's missing is what people would like, which is basically online collaboration. That's a problem. But it has so many other things to offer that SharePoint, I'm sure, will not have. So, that will be an interesting issue to come up. It's not very good at providing stable and robust add-ins to Microsoft. That's a bit of a problem with Content Manager. They're kind of very volatile. So, that's been definitely something that could be improved.

Read full review

Gavin Beckett

Intelligent Automation Solution Architect at Digiblu

Design studio enables effective automation while licensing needs improvement

I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors. Having this capability could accelerate the process. The delivery methodology felt somewhat waterfall in style and not sufficiently agile. Additionally, the licensing model was somewhat prohibitive. It was not developed in a consumption-based manner, however, rather in a fixed-price licensing model that did not account for volumes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For a records management system, Content Manager is a really good system."

"The tool's implementation has made life easier for customers. It is sold by SAP. The integration between SAP and the solution is good, making it easy to access the documents. It is widely recognized as a market leader in enterprise document management."

"I did not face issues with the product's scalability...The solution's technical support is good."

"We like how the solution allows us to have retention of records and workflows, as well as its fire plan."

"The most valuable features of OpenText Content Manager are its stability, reliability, security, and workflow engine."

"The product can be integrated with different solutions."

"An advantage is integration with your IP directory."

"It has a robust search but has often been difficult for people to learn."

"The key feature of SS&C that I find valuable is the general workflow visibility."

"Some important features include the language capabilities, which are crucial since RPA has to read the documents provided by the customer."

"I find the design studio, where I can build the automation, and the control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, to be the most useful."

Cons

"It's not very good at providing stable and robust add-ins to Microsoft."

"The ease of use should be addressed."

"Due to very limited use in the industry, vendor and contract support are hard to find."

"Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged because the first person may not understand the system or the solution."

"The stability of the solution is an area of concern where improvements can be made."

"OpenText Content Manager needs to improve its user interface. Its installation process is difficult and can be made easier."

"Pricing is an issue, as it is too expensive."

"The product could improve its scalability."

"There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C."

"Blue Prism is more costly than UiPath in terms of robotic licenses and orchestrators."

"I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."

"I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."

"The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."

"The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

20%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

12%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Content Manager?

An advantage is integration with your IP directory.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Content Manager?

Pricing is a disadvantage as it is very expensive, especially in this market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Content Manager?

Pricing is an issue, as it is too expensive. Support and services need to be more user-friendly. The support has been slow, and there is room for improvement. Additionally, they could improve build...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SS&C Blue Prism?

The pricing was not particularly competitive. It wasn't flexible for different geographies. For instance, in Africa, they didn't have a different pricing model to account for affordability. The pri...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SS&C Blue Prism?

There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C. Currently, integration is limited to web services and K scripts for connecting to third-party systems, which I believe ca...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SS&C Blue Prism?

My primary use case for SS&C is managing migration projects. We are currently working on migrating from ViewStation's 3.5 version using K scripts to the new version in SS&C and rebuilding t...

See all answers

Comparisons

SharePoint vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 27% of the time

OpenText Extended ECM vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Documentum vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Purview Records Management vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 11% of the time

IBM FileNet vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Content Manager Competitors

Camunda vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 34% of the time

Appian vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 25% of the time

IBM BPM vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 21% of the time

FIS Commercial Lending Suite vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 20% of the time

More SS&C Blue Prism Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Content Manager

March 2025

Download OpenText Content Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

March 2025

Download SS&C Blue Prism product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager

SS&C AWD

Overview

OpenText Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

OpenText

SS&C Blue Prism provides scalable, intelligent automation for dynamic business environments. Its technology enhances process efficiency and delivers significant operational benefits. Users leverage its capabilities in task automation and broader digital transformation strategies.

SS&C Blue Prism incorporates advanced robotic process automation aimed at optimizing workflows and enabling end-to-end automation. It allows businesses to automate repetitive tasks, integrate systems, and improve process accuracy. With a focus on enterprise-grade security and compliance, it helps organizations achieve digital transformation milestones while maintaining robust control frameworks.

What are the critical features of SS&C Blue Prism?

Robust Automation: Enables complex process automation with scalability.
Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with many systems and applications.
Security and Compliance: Ensures data protection and regulatory adherence.

What benefits or ROI should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Significant time savings and resource optimization.
Cost Reduction: Decreased operational costs through task automation.
Accuracy: Enhanced precision in process execution and data handling.

SS&C Blue Prism finds implementation across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, where automation is harnessed to optimize high-volume transactional tasks. In finance, it automates reconciliation processes, while in healthcare, it aids in patient data management, showcasing its versatility.

SS&C Technologies

Sample Customers

Missouri State Courts

AWS, EY, Deloitte, ABBYY, Microsoft, GLYNT.AI, Pfizer, Invesco, Western Union

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Content Manager vs. SS&C Blue Prism

February 2025

Free Report: OpenText Content Manager vs. SS&C Blue Prism

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Content Manager vs. SS&C Blue Prism and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Content Manager vs. SS&C Blue Prism report.

See our list of best Document Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.