OpenText UFT Developer vs Qt Squish comparison

OpenText and Qt Group are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.8, while Qt Group is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6. OpenText holds a 2.6% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qt Group’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT Developer

Read 37 OpenText UFT Developer reviews

2,133 Views
1,416 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 19 Qt Squish reviews

2,521 Views
1,373 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT Developer

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText UFT Developer and Qt Squish compete in the software test automation category. OpenText UFT Developer holds an advantage due to its support for multiple protocols and technologies, while Qt Squish gains strength from its cross-platform compatibility.

Features: OpenText UFT Developer integrates broadly with various development environments and supports complex test scenarios, making it adaptable for diverse testing needs. It is especially beneficial in environments requiring expansive technology support. Qt Squish shines in cross-platform testing, supporting numerous operating systems, creating a versatile tool for applications deployed across various platforms.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT Developer could improve its cross-platform support, making it as flexible as its integration capabilities. Enhancing native support for mobile applications and simplifying customization could also be beneficial. Qt Squish lacks in deep integration with some popular continuous integration tools and could further streamline its scripting languages. Its documentation, though extensive, sometimes lacks depth in specific areas, requiring enhancement to aid new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT Developer offers a simplified deployment aided by comprehensive documentation and responsive support, helping with quick implementation and issue resolution. Qt Squish provides flexibility in deployment, but its strength lies in platform support and decent customer service, which helps it adapt to various environments efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT Developer demands a higher initial setup investment but offers valuable features leading to a good ROI over time. Qt Squish, with competitive pricing and lower initial costs, appeals to smaller projects and delivers an effective ROI in multi-platform testing scenarios, making it a cost-efficient solution for versatile testing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qt Squish Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qt Squish

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT Developer

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (13th)

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Developer is 2.6%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Bosri

Process Architect Referent at Forvia

Efficient recording feature shines amid expected desktop and website enhancements

Our use case involves functionality for a system ERP. We work with Deviation, which is stable and receives positive feedback from users OpenText UFT Developer allows junior testers to learn through open source and online resources like YouTube. They can find solutions to issues even if the…

Read full review

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable

There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package. The froglogic Squish solution is only handling GUI regression testing, this is its forte. However, a lot of clients are looking into performance testing associated with it. If a performance testing capability can be added as a part of it, this would bring great value. froglogic Squish has a code coverage solution and they have done a pretty good job on it. The penetration testing could be added as a separate module, this would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a product that can meet regulations of the banking industry."

"It's a complete pursuit and it's a logical pursuit working with HPE."

"One aspect that I like about Micro Focus UFT Developer is the ability to integrate it into a testing framework as a library."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks."

"The most valuable feature for UFT is the ability to test a desktop application."

"The most valuable features are the object repository."

"The cost is the most important factor in this tool."

"There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership."

More OpenText UFT Developer pros

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

Cons

"It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding."

"Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful."

"It's now too heavy and they should be making it faster. We do an attempt at automatic regression testing. We schedule a test to start at a certain time. It takes a lot of time to download the resources and start UFT. Competitors in this area have tools that start faster and run the test faster. For example, if the test at our side will take 10 minutes, another tool will do that in one minute."

"In the next release, I would like to see integration with different cloud-based tools such as Azure."

"The support for .NET Framework and Visual Studio in Micro Focus UFT Developer is currently limited. At present, only Visual Studio 2019 is supported, despite the release of a newer version (2022). Similarly, the tool only supports up to .NET Framework version 4.3.8, while there have been six newer versions released. This is an area that could be improved upon, particularly in the Windows environment."

"UFT Developer is good, but it requires high-level development skills. Scripting is something that everybody should know to be able to work with this product. Currently, it is very development intensive, and you need to know various scripting languages. It would be good if the development effort could be cut short, and it can be scriptless like Tosca. It will help in more adoption because not every team has people with a software engineering background. If it is scriptless, the analysts who wear multiple hats and come from different backgrounds can also use it in a friendly manner. It is also quite expensive."

"In the next release, I would like to see the connectivity improved to be less complex and more stable."

"I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability."

More OpenText UFT Developer cons

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"The price could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten."

"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."

"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."

"When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."

"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."

"The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."

"The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."

"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."

More OpenText UFT Developer pricing and cost advice

"The platform is highly-priced."

"It is expensive."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

18%

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?

There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?

It's a high-priced solution compared to Selenium. Selenium is free, though there is a paid version now too. Selenium has improved a lot, and it's still okay to use. It's a functional testing tool, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?

The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites. It is also suggested that the design and some functionality could be better.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

Qt and Squish are considered to be on the expensive side compared to other software development tools. The pricing is not very flexible, which has been noted as a concern.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version. Upgrading Qt and Squish can be annoying and would be better if Squish were more integrated with Qt, to ease the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

We use Qt Squish primarily for test automation in our embedded systems. While I configure it and set it up, another person uses it for testing. We also use Squish integrated with Qt, a framework fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 59% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 4% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText UFT Developer Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 20% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 20% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 13% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 10% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer

January 2025

Download OpenText UFT Developer product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

January 2025

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT

froglogic Squish

Learn More

OpenText

Qt Group

Overview

With OpenText UFT Developer, you get object identification tools, parallel testing, and record/replay capabilities.

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Sample Customers

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qt Squish

January 2025

Free Report: OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qt Squish

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qt Squish and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT Developer vs. Qt Squish report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.