OpenText UFT One vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro comparison

"The solution's recording option is the most beneficial for test script creation and maintenance."

"With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources."

"With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files."

"The best feature of UFT by far is its compatibility with a large variety of products, tools and technologies. It is currently a challenge to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully automate tests for so many projects and environments."

"My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years."

"UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use."

"The ease of record and playback as well as descriptive programming are the most valuable features of UFT (QTP)."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus UFT One is you are able to use it with many other technologies. I have not had an instance where the solution was not able to automate or execute automation. I was able to use COBOL to manage some automation."

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

"Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification."

"You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out."

"They need to reduce the cost because it is pretty high. It's approximately $3,000 per user."

"The solution is expensive."

"I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved."

"UFT still requires some coding."

"The product doesn't provide free training for the basic features."

"One thing that confused me, and now just mildly irritates me, is that we migrated from QuickTest Pro to HP UFT, Unified Functional Test. After we did the migration, it turned out that we didn't really have Unified Functional Test at all."

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

"Its price is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"The solution is priced reasonably for what features it is providing. However, it might be expensive for some."

"For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

"It's an expensive solution."

"The pricing of the product is an issue."