OpenText UFT One vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro comparison

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Perforce is ranked #39. OpenText holds a 9.5% mindshare in FT, compared to Perforce’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText UFT One

Read 92 OpenText UFT One reviews

8,465 Views
5,308 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Perforce QA Wizard Pro

Read 1 Perforce QA Wizard Pro review

129 Views
90 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Perforce QA Wizard Pro

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and Perforce QA Wizard Pro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Perforce QA Wizard Pro

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

39th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

23rd

Average Rating

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.5%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perforce QA Wizard Pro is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

Sep 29, 2022

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

AlonKalangel

DevOps Engineer at Intel Corporation

Dec 30, 2019

Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability

I don't think that using this solution has improved the way our organization functions. We are staying with it, for now, because it is complicated to change source control platforms The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Micro Focus UFT One is a great tool and can be used in a variety of ways."

"One advantage of Micro Focus UFT is that it is more compatible with SAP, Desktop ECC SAP, than S/4HANA."

"The interface is fine and there is nothing else to add in terms of enhancement."

"With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources."

"The scalability of Micro Focus UFT One is good."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most valuable features are its support for multiple technologies, ease of coding, object repository, and ability to design our own framework. The recording playback feature allows those unfamiliar with coding to use the tool."

"I like the fact that you can record and play the record of your step scripts, and UFT One creates the steps for you in the code base. After that, you can alter the code, and it's more of a natural language code."

More OpenText UFT One pros

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

Cons

"I would like Micro Focus to provide more information on their portal about their newer products. The information about UFT One was outdated. The image recognition features could also be better."

"Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification."

"The product doesn't provide free training for the basic features."

"Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function."

"The scripting language could be improved. They're currently using Visual Basic, but I think that people need something more advanced, like Python or Java."

"The price is very high. They should work to lower the costs for their clients."

"The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded."

"I'd like to see test case-related reports included in the solution."

More OpenText UFT One cons

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is one aspect that could be improved."

"The pricing of the product is an issue."

"Compared to other products, the solution is very expensive."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"The price is reasonable."

"The tool's price is high."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

The solution should have additional features, but not much. It already has some sort of artificial intelligence that must be developed. It needs to be in trend. The solution needs better marketing,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

October 2024

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2024

Download Perforce QA Wizard Pro product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

Perforce

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

QA Wizard Pro automates functional and regression testing of web, Windows, and Java applications, and load test web applications.

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.