OpenText UFT One vs Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] comparison

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while Perforce is ranked #37. OpenText holds a 10.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Perforce’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

OpenText UFT One

Read 95 OpenText UFT One reviews

7,005 Views
4,400 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Read 1 Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] review

107 Views
71 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

OpenText UFT One and Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] are test automation tools. OpenText UFT One seems to have the upper hand due to its broader suite of features and advanced scripting language ecosystem.

Features: OpenText UFT One offers robust integrations, advanced scripting capabilities, and supports various environments, providing a comprehensive testing solution. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] is focused on straightforward automation and user-friendly interface, catering to simple setups and executions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One, with its extensive capabilities, has a more complex setup requiring initial configuration. It offers strong customer support. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] provides straightforward deployment and minimal configuration, but its end-of-life status might affect customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One generally has higher setup costs, offering potential for higher ROI in large-scale enterprises. Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] presents lower upfront costs suitable for smaller projects seeking quick returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 841,605 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

24th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 10.0%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

AlonKalangel

DevOps Engineer at Intel Corporation

Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability

The biggest problems with this solution have to do with scale. If the load is high then your request is put on hold for a second, and then you have to handle it. If you make a lot of requests then it is your problem. It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time. Any additional request would be put on hold and made to wait for a few seconds. Once the network and infrastructure are loaded to handle the next request, it would proceed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high."

"It's simple to set up."

"The interface is fine and there is nothing else to add in terms of enhancement."

"It is a stable solution."

"I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well."

"Automation of tests is done very fast with UFT One."

"I find UFT One to be very good for thick clients, which are non-browser applications."

"Compared to other products, UFT One is better, faster, and more accurate."

More OpenText UFT One pros

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

Cons

"I would want to see a significant improvement in the tool's features. The most significant enhancements are support for panel execution and integration with DevSecOps."

"The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on specialist resources."

"The solution does not have proper scripting."

"There could be improvements in report export features similar to SmartBear."

"It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS."

"They need to reduce the licensing cost. There's pushback from customers because of the cost."

"We used to run it as a test suite. Micro Focus provides that in terms of a test management tool as ALM, but when we think of integrating with a distributed version control system, like Jenkins, there isn't much integration available. That means we need to make use of external solutions to make it work."

"Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function."

More OpenText UFT One cons

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."

"Its price is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"The licensing cost is high. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"The tool's price is high."

"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

"The pricing of the product is an issue."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

841,605 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

UFT still requires some coding. If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again. Additionally, customer support could be improved as they take days to ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 32% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

February 2025

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2025

Download Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

No data available

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] is an automated testing tool designed to streamline testing processes for software development teams. Its sophisticated features support efficient and comprehensive test management, ensuring high-quality software delivery.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] offers extensive functionality for software testing that supports both beginners and advanced users. It facilitates script creation, test execution, and result analysis across different scripting environments. QA teams benefit from its flexibility and compatibility, allowing seamless integration into existing workflows.

What are the key features of Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL]?

Scriptless Testing: Simplifies test creation through a user-friendly interface.
Cross-Platform Testing: Ensures software reliability across multiple platforms.
Integration Support: Enhances efficiency by integrating with existing tools and systems.
Custom Reporting: Provides detailed insights into test outcomes for informed decision-making.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts, saving time.
Comprehensive Testing: Identifies bugs earlier, minimizing future costs.
Scalability: Accommodates growing testing needs with ease.
Improved Software Quality: Ensures consistent performance and functionality.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro [EOL] sees widespread use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail due to its ability to handle complex testing scenarios. Its flexibility allows it to meet the demanding requirements of these industries, supporting a wide range of applications and ensuring robust software performance.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

841,605 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.