OpenText UFT One vs Testim comparison

Read 9 Testim reviews

1,763 Views
1,230 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText UFT One and Testim compete in the automated testing domain, with data comparisons suggesting Testim might have an edge due to its advanced features and perceived value, despite OpenText UFT One's pricing and support advantages.

Features: OpenText UFT One provides comprehensive support for a variety of applications and languages, robust test management, and extensive coverage for detailed oversight. Testim is focused on AI-driven testing, which increases speed and efficiency, and supports seamless integration with modern CI/CD pipelines.

Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One could enhance its cloud integration, reduce setup complexity, and improve user interface modernization. Testim may benefit from expanding application support, increasing customization options, and providing more detailed documentation for complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One offers a traditional deployment model with thorough enterprise-level support, though it may demand more setup resources. Testim's cloud-based model enables fast adoption and integration, emphasizing accessibility and real-time customer support for agile responses and swifter deployment.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One incurs a higher setup cost but offers value through extensive capabilities resulting in long-term ROI. Testim's flexible pricing appeals to teams seeking scalability and a faster ROI turnaround due to AI enhancements and streamlined operations.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Testim Report (Updated: November 2024).

OpenText UFT One vs. Testim

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.5

Organizations using OpenText UFT One experience up to 300% ROI through enhanced efficiency and 60% test automation.

No sentiment score available

Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Senior Manager at Deloitte

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Testim report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.3

OpenText UFT One's customer service is praised for expertise but faces challenges with response speed and technician knowledge variability.

Sentiment score

7.4

Testim's customer service is responsive and effective, providing quick assistance and high-quality support, especially for technical issues.

Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

The technical support is rated eight out of ten.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Senior Manager at Deloitte

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Testim report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

OpenText UFT One is highly scalable, adaptable for varying team sizes, with some execution speed challenges in large test suites.

Sentiment score

7.9

Testim offers effective scalability for varying user needs, resolving initial cost challenges and supporting medium organizations and DevOps teams.

The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Testim report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.6

Opinions on OpenText UFT One's stability vary, with some users experiencing stability issues influenced by system specifications and configurations.

Sentiment score

7.4

Testim users report high stability and reliability, with minimal issues and unaffected outcomes from numerous code changes.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Testim report

Room For Improvement

OpenText UFT One needs improvements in compatibility, performance, technology support, integration, cost, and usability for enhanced user experience.

Testim requires improvements in UI efficiency, feature customization, comprehensive documentation, stability, and cost effectiveness for enhanced testing capabilities.

Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Testim report

Setup Cost

OpenText UFT One is costly but valued for reducing manual testing and enhancing automation efficiency, sometimes offering discounts.

Enterprise users find Testim cost-effective, appreciating its fixed pricing model and value compared to competitors with minimal extra costs.

It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Senior Manager at Deloitte

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Testim report

Valuable Features

OpenText UFT One is versatile, supporting multiple platforms with AI capabilities and robust integration for comprehensive test automation.

Testim offers record/playback, algorithm support, REST API, CLI integration, and AI features for efficient testing with ease.

The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.

Support Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers.

For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report

Senior Manager at Deloitte

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Testim report

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (4th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

12th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.6%, up from 9.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 2.8%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson

QA Automation Engineer at Global Fortune 500 Company

With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results

With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.

Read full review

Dheeraj Bavirisetty

Senior Consultant at Eviden France

Enhancing automation skills, intuitive, and low-code

We use Testim to automate our testing scripts. I am part of the testing team for a corporate bank in the US, which is my client. We work on building their product, and Testim is used to automate the scripts since it is a low-code automation platform The feature I like most about Testim is the…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

The user interface could be improved.

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

What needs improvement with Testim?

There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now.

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Comparisons

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 53% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 24% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 13% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 3% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText UFT One

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Download Testim product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

OpenText UFT One vs. Testim