Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OutSystems vs Superblocks comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.3
OutSystems' customer service is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, though some users note delays and technical support improvement needs.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.8
Users request better containerization, integration, language support, and improvements in performance, documentation, UI development, and automation features.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.5
OutSystems offers impressive scalability, seamlessly handling large back-ends across platforms, though better specifications than recommended may be required.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
OutSystems is costly and suited for large enterprises, with prices from $4,000 to €170,000 annually, including user licenses and infrastructure.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
OutSystems is praised for stability and performance, though some note issues under heavy loads or with high user volumes.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
OutSystems offers rapid development, integration, scalability, and a user-friendly interface, unifying front and backend services to boost productivity.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

OutSystems
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (2nd)
Superblocks
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
53rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Vadivelan Rajendiran - PeerSpot reviewer
The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend
The solution is ground up, it follows exactly what the developer does. The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided. Infusing AI that would automate the process would be game-changing. On a logical level, if data on a form is automated, it would be great if when required, the developer can then go and look for it.
Use Superblocks?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
32%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
1. Airbnb 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. ATT 5. Bank of America 6. BlackRock 7. Citigroup 8. CocaCola 9. Comcast 10. Costco 11. Delta Air Lines 12.Disney 13. eBay 14. ExxonMobil 15. FedEx 16. Ford Motor Company 17. Google 18. Goldman Sachs 19. Home Depot 20. IBM 21. Intel 22. JPMorgan Chase 23. Kraft Heinz 24. McDonalds 25. Merck 26. Microsoft 27. Nike 28. Oracle 29. PepsiCo 30. Procter Gamble 31. Starbucks 32. Tesla
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Oracle and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.