Parasoft SOAtest vs Qt Squish comparison

Parasoft and Qt Group are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qt Group is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5. Parasoft holds a 0.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qt Group’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 31 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

346 Views
207 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

2,493 Views
1,298 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Qt Squish compete in the software testing domain, each offering unique advantages. Parasoft SOAtest stands out for comprehensive testing solutions, while Qt Squish is noted for its versatile automation.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers extensive API testing, service virtualization, and event monitoring, making it suitable for complex environments. It supports a wide range of protocols such as JSON and provides robust reporting and integration options. Qt Squish is recognized for cross-platform GUI testing, integration with CI systems, and supports multiple scripting languages, providing flexibility and ease of use.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance its ease of use for beginners and provide more intuitive interfaces. It might also look at reducing complexity in setting up scenarios. Qt Squish could improve support for non-GUI applications and offer more comprehensive documentation. Faster execution times might also enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment for Parasoft SOAtest is noted for seamless integration into existing systems, backed by solid customer service. Qt Squish offers efficient deployment with ongoing updates and strong technical support, ensuring consistent performance and engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest's higher initial cost reflects its advanced capabilities, promising a substantial ROI in complex environments. Qt Squish, while also representing a significant investment, is seen as cost-effective for its broad functionalities, offering a rapid ROI, especially advantageous for varied and adaptable testing requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.4

Parasoft SOAtest enhances API testing efficiency with minimal coding, offering high ROI and simplified complex test creation.

Sentiment score

7.3

Qt Squish reduced manual testing time, enabled agile cycles, improved efficiency, and optimized processes with stable automation suites.

We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

For the part that has been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.8

Customer service is effective and quick, though international communication and complex issues occasionally cause delays.

Sentiment score

6.9

Qt Squish's customer service is efficient and knowledgeable, with quick responses, but video support can be expensive.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.2

Parasoft SOAtest is praised for scalability, but faces challenges with large tests and cloud platforms, requiring careful design.

Sentiment score

7.2

Qt Squish is praised for scalability, especially with floating licenses, but some face minor issues like image recognition glitches.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

With one license, just one user or one test scenario can be run at a time.

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.5

Parasoft SOAtest is generally stable with improved reliability since 9.10, and support effectively resolves occasional performance issues.

Sentiment score

8.0

Users report high stability with Qt Squish, experiencing minimal issues, which are quickly resolved by support and updates.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Room For Improvement

Parasoft SOAtest needs UI enhancements, better reporting, improved integration, and documentation, with issues in memory, robustness, and compatibility.

Qt Squish needs improvements in object identification, testing stability, integration, and enhanced support for non-Qt applications while addressing pricing and speed issues.

It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

If you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java.

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Setup Cost

Parasoft SOAtest is costly but valued for its robust automation and features; organizations should evaluate its suitability.

Qt Squish receives mixed reviews for its pricing, with high costs and inflexible licensing compared to other tools.

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Valuable Features

Parasoft SOAtest streamlines test scenario setup with powerful tools, enhancing customization, scalability, and automation in testing processes.

Qt Squish is a versatile UI testing tool praised for cross-platform support, Python compatibility, and seamless CI integration.

Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

For more quotes and insights, download the Qt Squish report

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (28th), Functional Testing Tools (20th), API Testing Tools (11th)

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved

In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.

Read full review

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Manufacturing Company

22%

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be imp...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for automotive compliance and sanity-checking scores.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 14% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 22% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 17% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 9% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

March 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

March 2025

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

froglogic Squish

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Qt Group

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish

March 2025

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. Qt Squish report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.