Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

PractiTest vs Zephyr Enterprise comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
PractiTest is commended for its rapid, knowledgeable support, courteous service, and efficient onboarding process that ensures seamless user adaptation.
No sentiment score available
Zephyr Enterprise's responsive, efficient, and knowledgeable support team ensures swift resolutions and excellent customer experience with professional, proactive assistance.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
PractiTest needs better customization, integration, and reporting, and can be more intuitive with faster performance for large datasets.
Sentiment score
2.3
Zephyr Enterprise requires improvements in versioning, reporting, automation integration, test repository, security, and error messaging for better functionality.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
PractiTest excels in scalability, efficiency, and flexibility, integrating well with tools and workflows for teams of various sizes.
Sentiment score
6.5
Zephyr Enterprise offers scalable usage for organizations, allowing flexible user-based payments and easy scaling up or down in the cloud.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
<p>PractiTest's flexible pricing and features streamline QA processes, making it suitable for various budgets and large teams.</p>
No sentiment score available
<p>Zephyr Enterprise provides flexible, cost-effective pricing starting at $240 per user annually, with options for volume discounts and custom quotes.</p>
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
PractiTest is praised for its stability, reliability, robust performance, easy maintenance, and seamless integration, ensuring efficient project workflows.
Sentiment score
5.4
Users consider Zephyr Enterprise very stable, with rare issues, and rate its stability highly, often nine out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
PractiTest offers customizable dashboards, seamless tool integration, efficient test management, detailed reports, and intuitive design enhancing productivity and quality assurance.
Sentiment score
8.0
Zephyr Enterprise provides flexible test management with automation integration, robust reporting, and a user-friendly interface at a low cost.
 

Categories and Ranking

PractiTest
Ranking in Test Management Tools
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (21st)
Zephyr Enterprise
Ranking in Test Management Tools
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of PractiTest is 2.5%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zephyr Enterprise is 10.1%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

NC
Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization
Integration with other platforms, Test Set schedule, custom filters, requirements linking with the test case, and the Dashboard are the most valuable features of this product. Just one click on the Dashboard and we get all reports in graphical format. Dashboards and reports are very customizable and the ability to share metrics with other colleagues is a great feature. Custom filters are really a big advantage of PractiTest. We have hundreds of tests and test sets that we can arrange properly and easily thanks to this tool. In addition, PractiTest offers a good reporting module and integration with other platforms such as JIRA, which we use daily. Advanced customization allows us to customize the tool's settings in accordance with all our needs. We integrated PractiTest with Pivotal Tracker and it allowed us to have everything synced on two systems and to make our testing process more professional.
Tin Bùi - PeerSpot reviewer
Highly stable solution and meets users' needs
It's mostly used for sales and customer verification. We gather customer information and verify that it's a real person Security is always a top priority in the IT business. We would like to see improvements in the security measures to ensure that customer information is protected. I have been…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Healthcare Company
9%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Zephyr Enterprise?
We faced some errors while uploading the test cases. The error was not clear. We did not know what the error was.
What is your primary use case for Zephyr Enterprise?
We use the solution for test case management.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SmartBear Zephyr
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Canonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
Hyundai, Fujitsu, Google, David Jones, Burger King, Ingenico, Websense, Dow Jones, Harris, Saab
Find out what your peers are saying about PractiTest vs. Zephyr Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.