Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Zephyr Enterprise Logo

Top 10 Zephyr Enterprise Alternatives

Vendor: SmartBear
3.9 out of 5
552 followers
Post review

Top Zephyr Enterprise Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Zephyr Enterprise based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include TFS, OpenText ALM / Quality Center, and Eggplant Test. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SmartBear Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SmartBear, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
TFS
4.0 out of 5
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
TFS
4.0 out of 5
TFS excels in integration with development environments and version control, while Zephyr Enterprise offers comprehensive test management features and advanced analytics. In comparison, TFS has scalable reporting capabilities, and Zephyr Enterprise handles extensive datasets more effectively, offering a feature-rich solution for large test teams.
Download TFS vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
TFS has a significantly lower setup cost than Zephyr Enterprise, which presents a higher initial investment requirement.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has a significantly lower setup cost than Zephyr Enterprise, which presents a higher initial investment requirement.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
4.0 out of 5
OpenText ALM / Quality Center offers comprehensive reporting and traceability features, receiving praise for its support and pricing. In comparison, Zephyr Enterprise's seamless Jira integration and customizable dashboards stand out. OpenText ALM's modern design needs contrast with Zephyr's performance issues and higher initial investment.
Download OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
OpenText ALM / Quality Center has a higher setup cost compared to Zephyr Enterprise, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Zephyr Enterprise is often preferred for those focused on minimizing upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText ALM / Quality Center has a higher setup cost compared to Zephyr Enterprise, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Zephyr Enterprise is often preferred for those focused on minimizing upfront expenses.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Eggplant Test
3.9 out of 5
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Eggplant Test
3.9 out of 5
Zephyr Enterprise excels in test management and Jira integration, making it ideal for detailed testing on a budget. In comparison, Eggplant Test stands out for its advanced automation and AI features, despite its higher cost. Zephyr offers affordability, while Eggplant justifies its price with superior capabilities.
Download Eggplant Test vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
Zephyr Enterprise's setup cost is lower compared to Eggplant Test, providing a cost-effective solution for small to medium teams. Eggplant Test, though more expensive initially, offers advanced features that may benefit larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Zephyr Enterprise's setup cost is lower compared to Eggplant Test, providing a cost-effective solution for small to medium teams. Eggplant Test, though more expensive initially, offers advanced features that may benefit larger enterprises.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Tricentis qTest
4.2 out of 5
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Tricentis qTest
4.2 out of 5
For test management, Tricentis qTest offers robust planning, execution, and reporting features that streamline processes. In comparison, Zephyr Enterprise excels in Jira integration and advanced test automation. While qTest is praised for ease of deployment, Zephyr requires more setup but offers comprehensive capabilities.
Download Tricentis qTest vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
Tricentis qTest presents a straightforward setup cost structure; Zephyr Enterprise, on the other hand, involves a more complex and higher initial setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tricentis qTest presents a straightforward setup cost structure; Zephyr Enterprise, on the other hand, involves a more complex and higher initial setup investment.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
TestRail
4.0 out of 5
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
TestRail
4.0 out of 5
TestRail excels in ease of use, comprehensive reporting, and straightforward deployment with responsive support. In comparison, Zephyr Enterprise offers robust integration capabilities, advanced analytics, flexible deployment options, and higher pricing but delivers extensive features and better long-term ROI.
Download TestRail vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
TestRail has lower setup costs compared to Zephyr Enterprise, which has higher initial setup fees. Zephyr Enterprise's extensive features could justify its higher setup cost for some users.
View comparison
Pricing
TestRail has lower setup costs compared to Zephyr Enterprise, which has higher initial setup fees. Zephyr Enterprise's extensive features could justify its higher setup cost for some users.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Visual Studio Test Professional
4.2 out of 5
Visual Studio Test Professional integrates smoothly with Microsoft tools and offers automated testing and performance testing features. In comparison, Zephyr Enterprise excels in test management, real-time insights, and extensive reporting. Visual Studio's deployment is straightforward, while Zephyr's robust functionality justifies its higher cost.
Download Visual Studio Test Professional vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
Visual Studio Test Professional has a higher one-time setup cost, while Zephyr Enterprise offers a lower initial setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Visual Studio Test Professional has a higher one-time setup cost, while Zephyr Enterprise offers a lower initial setup expense.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Helix ALM
3.2 out of 5
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Helix ALM
3.2 out of 5
Helix ALM excels in requirements management, issue tracking, and test case management, known for user satisfaction and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Zephyr Enterprise excels in advanced testing capabilities, Agile support, and integration with Jira, making it ideal for large-scale projects requiring detailed test execution and reporting functionalities.
Download Helix ALM vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
Helix ALM offers lower setup costs with straightforward initial implementation, while Zephyr Enterprise involves higher setup expenses due to its more complex configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Helix ALM offers lower setup costs with straightforward initial implementation, while Zephyr Enterprise involves higher setup expenses due to its more complex configuration.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Panaya Test Dynamix
4.3 out of 5
Zephyr Enterprise offers cost-effective test management with JIRA integration, making it ideal for budget-conscious projects. In comparison, Panaya Test Dynamix features advanced impact analysis and accelerated test cycles, providing substantial ROI despite higher costs. Panaya's extensive capabilities suit larger enterprises requiring robust solutions.
Download Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
Zephyr Enterprise has a higher setup cost, while Panaya Test Dynamix offers a lower entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
Zephyr Enterprise has a higher setup cost, while Panaya Test Dynamix offers a lower entry point.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
IBM Engineering Test Management
3.8 out of 5
IBM Engineering Test Management offers comprehensive test planning and traceability capabilities, making it ideal for detailed project management. In comparison, Zephyr Enterprise, with its superior JIRA integration and real-time test metrics, stands out for agile environments requiring advanced reporting and robust integration capabilities.
Download IBM Engineering Test Management vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
IBM Engineering Test Management has a high initial setup cost, while Zephyr Enterprise offers a more affordable setup, catering to different budget needs. Zephyr Enterprise's pricing is more attractive for cost-conscious projects compared to IBM Engineering Test Management's higher expe...
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Engineering Test Management has a high initial setup cost, while Zephyr Enterprise offers a more affordable setup, catering to different budget needs. Zephyr Enterprise's pricing is more attractive for cost-conscious projects compared to IBM Engineering Test Management's higher expe...
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
PractiTest
4.4 out of 5
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
PractiTest
4.4 out of 5
Zephyr Enterprise offers robust test planning, execution, and tracking functionalities. In comparison, PractiTest excels in customizability, reporting, and integrating with other tools. Zephyr Enterprise users may face scalability issues, while PractiTest has automation integration challenges. PractiTest's higher pricing reflects its advanced features and integration benefits.
Download PractiTest vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
Zephyr Enterprise has a higher initial setup cost compared to PractiTest, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Zephyr Enterprise has a higher initial setup cost compared to PractiTest, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
4.0 out of 5
Zephyr Enterprise offers comprehensive test management and integration capabilities, making it ideal for holistic management needs. In comparison, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer excels in detailed requirements management and automation, appealing to those prioritizing these features. Zephyr Enterprise eases deployment, while Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer justifies its price with extensive functionalities.
Download Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
Zephyr Enterprise has a moderate setup cost, while Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expense between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Zephyr Enterprise has a moderate setup cost, while Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer requires a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in upfront expense between the two solutions.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira
3.6 out of 5
Zephyr Enterprise is noted for its extensive functionality and detailed documentation, especially in test planning and reporting. In comparison, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is favored for its seamless Jira integration and powerful traceability features. Zephyr offers robust customer service, whereas Adaptavist excels in easy deployment.
Download Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
Zephyr Enterprise entails an initial setup cost that is competitive, while Adaptavist Test Management for Jira requires a higher setup investment. Adaptavist's pricing reflects its premium positioning, contrasting with Zephyr's balanced cost approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Zephyr Enterprise entails an initial setup cost that is competitive, while Adaptavist Test Management for Jira requires a higher setup investment. Adaptavist's pricing reflects its premium positioning, contrasting with Zephyr's balanced cost approach.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
OpenText Silk Central
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Silk Central offers competitive pricing and supportive customer service. In comparison, Zephyr Enterprise provides smoother deployment and advanced functionalities. OpenText integrates well with other OpenText products, while Zephyr excels in customizable dashboards and Jira integration, making it suitable for Agile frameworks.
Download OpenText Silk Central vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
OpenText Silk Central has a higher setup cost compared to Zephyr Enterprise, which offers a more affordable setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Silk Central has a higher setup cost compared to Zephyr Enterprise, which offers a more affordable setup option.
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
QMetry Test Management
3.0 out of 5

QMetry is a suite of most comprehensive test management products to provide agile testing teams innovative technology platforms to deploy better Quality Software faster with confidence. It has more than 20 integrations. QMetry brand is trusted by 400+ customers globally across many industries including Finance, Healthcare Services, Travel & Hospitality, Retail, Education and High Technology.

QMetry was cheaper than Xray, which was based on the number of users.
View comparison
Pricing
QMetry was cheaper than Xray, which was based on the number of users.

Related categories

Test Management Tools
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)