Qlik Compose vs SAS Data Management comparison

Qlik and SAS are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #48, while SAS is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0. Qlik holds a 0.9% mindshare in DI, compared to SAS’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of SAS users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,942 Views
1,670 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

SAS Data Management

Read 18 SAS Data Management reviews

3,184 Views
1,847 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

SAS Data Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Data Management and Qlik Compose compete in the data management and data integration category. SAS Data Management seems to have the upper hand with its robust data management capabilities across diverse environments, although Qlik Compose shines in simplifying data warehouse automation.

Features: SAS Data Management offers capabilities like ETL, CDC, and MDM, delivering comprehensive data integration and analysis, praised for its flexibility and powerful analytics abilities. Qlik Compose is known for its simplicity in data warehouse automation, real-time replication, and excellent auto-mapping, making data modeling and code generation easy.

Room for Improvement: SAS Data Management could benefit from more competitive pricing and licensing, enhanced cloud integration with better connectivity options, and improved documentation. Qlik Compose faces challenges with complex SQL processing, needs better monitoring and ETL capabilities, and calls for improved support for high-volume data processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Data Management is mostly deployed on-premises, with strong post-acquisition customer service, but technical support experiences vary. Qlik Compose offers flexible deployment options on-premises and cloud, receiving feedback for decent but improvable customer support.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Data Management is considered expensive but valued for its comprehensive capabilities that offer high ROI for large enterprises. Qlik Compose offers a pricing model based on data volume with mixed feedback, showing potential ROI by optimizing data accuracy and efficiency, but its competitiveness for broader adoption could improve.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 890,124 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

48th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAS Data Management

Ranking in Data Integration

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (8th), Data Governance (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Management is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAS Data Management	1.3%
Qlik Compose	0.9%
Other	97.8%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Fernanda Knopki

Data Scientist & Scrum Master at Volvo Group

Has supported centralized data access and improved governance through unified administration

The best features I appreciate about SAS Data Management tool are that it's easy to create the flows and schedule data, and the tables are not too big, making it easy to control the ETL process, including user access which is also easy to manage in SAS. The data integration tools with SAS Data Management were quite good because they allowed me to do all lineage, to manage and see all the variables, find the libraries where the data is, and understand the data in just one tool. Offering another development environment combining code and predefined objects, where I could just drag and drop to achieve what I needed, although some objects were not too good, but some were effective. The metadata management feature of SAS Data Management helps a lot; creating your data marts or data lake with good naming conventions, library conventions, and so on is very important because it allows easy queries to find the whole structure, though I think metadata governance also depends on first definitions, not only on the tool. SAS Data Management is very good for data governance; for me, it was the best tool I worked with in data management, although I don't have too much experience with others, and it truly helped a lot.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a stable solution."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

More Qlik Compose pros

"For the warehouse and BI environment, SAS is very quick, very intuitive, very, very powerful, and very valuable."

"I find the solution to be very stable."

"Their software pricing offers the best value for money on the market."

"DataFlux in my opinion is an excellent high end solution for enterprise wide data management."

"This is an established product with powerful data analysis and varied options for user entry points."

"The technical support is excellent."

"The tool is reliable, quick, and powerful."

"The product offers very good flexibility."

More SAS Data Management pros

Cons

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"There could be more customization options."

More Qlik Compose cons

"Costly. Not great for non-ETL use cases."

"Native SAP integration or more efficient SAP is needed."

"One problem is accessing the data using a solution other than SAS. The SAS data, which we create in the SAS, cannot be accessed by other tools."

"We find we often have to go back and re-train users when there are changes made to the solution because the changes are not intuitive."

"The solution is very expensive."

"The pricing of the solution needs to be improved. They need to work to make it more affordable."

"The stability could be a bit better. It's lacking in this area right now."

"The solution is quite expensive and hard to install/configure."

More SAS Data Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"While it is even free for personal use on the cloud, it can be expensive for desktop installations and enterprise use."

"The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

890,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Management?

From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAS Data Management?

There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAS Data Management?

The main idea for using SAS Data Management was to bring all data inside SAS. I brought the finance area and the sales area in the company that I have worked, along with some market planning data, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 12% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 10% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 8% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

Airbyte Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 5% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management

Compared 10% of the time

WhereScape RED vs SAS Data Management

Compared 10% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management

Compared 9% of the time

Collibra Platform vs SAS Data Management

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs SAS Data Management

Compared 5% of the time

More SAS Data Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

April 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

SAS Data Management

April 2026

Download SAS Data Management product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux

Overview

Qlik Compose enhances data management with ETL capabilities, data integration with CDC, and real-time replication. Its intuitive interface enables easy data modeling and automation, supporting various database integrations.

Qlik Compose is designed for efficient data preparation, migration, and warehouse generation. It incorporates ETL functionalities and data integration with CDC, allowing users to effortlessly create data marts without code. Its automation features facilitate warehouse design while graphical representations and connectivity options increase versatility across multiple sources. Users value its stability, scalability, and the support provided, although improvements in ETL functionalities, performance for large datasets, and NoSQL integration are needed. The solution is widely used in business intelligence with tools like Qlik Replicate for real-time data replication and requires direct SQL for complex transformations.

What are the key features of Qlik Compose?

ETL Capabilities: Simplifies data extraction, transformation, and loading
Data Integration with CDC: Enables real-time data replication
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easy data modeling and automation
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Streamlines data task management
Auto-Mapping: Enhances integration of multiple data sources
No-Code Data Marts Creation: Reduces dependency on technical skills

What benefits should users consider in the reviews?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable functioning for growing data needs
Technical Support: Availability of assistance for troubleshooting
Real-Time Replication Capabilities: Efficient data processing and analytics
Low-Code Development: Simplifies complex data handling processes

In industries, Qlik Compose is implemented for enhancing data preparation, migration, and warehousing. It is used in small projects or straightforward data integration tasks and supports business intelligence efforts by offering low-code capabilities, enabling companies to deliver tailored analytics solutions efficiently.

Qlik

SAS Data Management provides data integration, governance, and robust reporting tools. It connects to diverse data sources, ensuring quality management and enabling data analysis for technical and non-technical users.

SAS Data Management features flexible data flow creation, scheduling, and ETL control. It enhances data integration and metadata management with tools that support data standardization. Users benefit from its importing and exporting capabilities, connecting to multiple sources. It facilitates improved data quality management and offers a flexible language for diverse needs. Data visualization capabilities further support decision-making across industries, automating reports and data warehouses.

What are the key features of SAS Data Management?

User-friendly interface: Intuitive navigation facilitates ease of use.
Easy data flow creation: Streamlines processes for seamless data management.
Scheduling and ETL control: Automates tasks for increased efficiency.
Data integration: Connects datasets from multiple origins.
Metadata management: Ensures consistency and quality of data.
Data governance: Provides tools for managing data compliance.
Robust reporting: Delivers comprehensive insights through detailed reports.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Data standardization: Enhances data predictability and usability.
Data quality management: Improves accuracy and integrity.
Flexible language: Adapts to specific user requirements.
Import/export capabilities: Facilitates seamless data transitions.
Support for diverse users: Offers tools suitable for varied skill levels.
Automation features: Saves time by reducing manual processes.

SAS Data Management helps industries like finance integrate diverse data sources for analytics and reporting. It is used for tasks such as financial reporting, credit risk analysis, and data cleansing. Through user-driven automation, it aids in aligning data warehouses and generating insightful visual outputs, making it ideal for analyzing structured data from sources like Excel and CSV files.

SAS

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management

April 2026

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

890,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.