SOTI MobiControl vs Scalefusion comparison

Scalefusion and SOTI are both solutions in the Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) category. Scalefusion is ranked #18, while SOTI is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. Scalefusion holds a 2.0% mindshare in EMM, compared to SOTI’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Scalefusion users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of SOTI users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

SOTI MobiControl and Scalefusion are two leading mobile device management solutions. While SOTI MobiControl offers comprehensive features with stronger deployment capabilities and higher pricing, Scalefusion provides cost-effective solutions with good support and ease of use.

Features: SOTI MobiControl includes advanced remote control, real-time device information, and extensive policy management. Scalefusion offers integration capabilities, app management, and location tracking.

Room for Improvement: SOTI MobiControl could improve in user training, more intuitive navigation, and better performance on older devices. Scalefusion users seek enhancements in reporting features, more customization options, and a more robust alert system.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SOTI MobiControl has a robust deployment model with extensive customer support but some users find the setup process complex. Scalefusion is easy to deploy and offers responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: SOTI MobiControl has a higher setup cost but offers significant ROI through its advanced features. Scalefusion provides a more budget-friendly option with respectable ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SOTI MobiControl vs. Scalefusion Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SOTI MobiControl vs. Scalefusion

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,852 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 22.1%, down from 33.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Scalefusion is 2.0%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SOTI MobiControl is 4.7%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Intune	22.1%
SOTI MobiControl	4.7%
Scalefusion	2.0%
Other	71.2%

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

Sipho Ngubonde

Admin at IEC (Electoral Commission of South Africa)

It has significantly increased the amount of work we can perform, but blocking devices could be easier.

It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button. Currently, we have to sift through different groups to block a device. It would be nice if Scalefusion allowed me to block without moving the device to a different profile. Another helpful feature they could add is the ability to migrate from one MDM to another. I'd also appreciate more extensive cloud storage. They give you 1 GB by default, but sometimes that's not enough.

Read full review

Shailesh S. Moogi

Regional Manager Presales & Training at QodeNext India Private Limited

Has improved mobile device management through features such as geofencing, firmware upgrades, and centralized control

One of the best features of SOTI MobiControl is that it is one of the oldest MDM solutions available. There are many features such as geofencing with map integration, APK upgrade, firmware upgrade, and it provides battery status, device status, and more. SOTI MobiControl impacts organizations positively because customers want an application MDM solution for managing their mobile devices from a central control. They have given good feedback and were happy with the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Intune is flexible. If you want to move a device that was previously on-prem, we can bring it to the cloud and apply all the policies. This is helpful for even those organizations that were on-prem and not on the cloud. They can also come and use these features, which are pretty cool and would be handy to protect the data and manage the devices as well."

"ROI is very high at the end."

"As the solution is a software as a service, the scalability is unlimited."

"Most people prefer to use Intune if they want to implement conditional access policies to restrict customer Exchange Online or Exchange user formats emails until their devices comply."

"This improved control and visibility has helped my organization by reducing risks, saving time, and making compliance easier."

"EAM is a godsend."

"The user experience is good; we could work and deploy many controls through Microsoft Intune."

"Intune has automated the deployment of patches and applications, which is more efficient and easier. It allows us to deploy applications, packages, Windows updates, and security updates like BitLocker encryption more efficiently and easily."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"Scalefusion is easy to use, and they have a broad knowledge base, so you can quickly find answers if you're unsure how to do something. The articles on the knowledge base are well-written, with clear steps on what to do for a specific scenario. That part is well documented."

"Scalefusion has significantly increased the amount of work we can perform and has made it much easier to achieve our goals efficiently by eliminating tedious work and cumbersome processes."

"Its enhanced support for iOS and Windows devices has been particularly beneficial, expanding our service offerings to customers with diverse device environments."

"The admin part, where I'm adding users, is not too bad. It's easy enough to use."

"SOTI's most valuable feature has to be mobile device management and visibility through the main console. There's a central dashboard that you can use to monitor the devices and keep track of usage, battery consumption, and battery life."

"In my opinion, what makes SOTI better than the others is their support."

"SOTI MobiControl is user-friendly and easy to access compared to AirWatch."

"The installation is very straightforward."

"It's been very stable over the past few years."

"The feature I find most valuable within Soti is the ability to reset or unlock a device. A lot of the devices that we use are in the field. We have locations in Dallas, San Diego, Seattle, Washington, and Phoenix, Arizona and there isn't always someone, within our company, who is managing these devices. Sometimes it's the doctors' offices that we partner with where they use these devices. Having the ability to remotely reset a device or unlock a device has been super-crucial for me."

"The solution helps us streamline our deployments and troubleshooting, saving a lot of time by avoiding downtime."

More SOTI MobiControl pros

Cons

"If you have a reporting-extensive company, for example, then you may need to look for other products."

"For macOS devices, we use the Jamf portal. I understand that the Jamf portal and server are more secure than Microsoft Intune for macOS."

"There are areas that have room for improvement in Microsoft Intune, particularly regarding integrations."

"The reporting causes problems because we're trying to gather data to present to the management, but we can't get the data they request. If a user has removed an application from his device, but it won't report it at exactly the right time. It takes time to sync from the device to the portal. Let's say we are preparing a list or deck for the number of compliant devices that meet all of the organization's requirements. In a real-time scenario, that device could be compliant, but it is showing as non-compliant on the portal. It sometimes hampers the overall decisions that we make on our end."

"Its integration with Mac and Linux devices can be better. They should provide more features similar to Windows. We should be able to manage policies within Linux and Mac machines. If we can have more granular controls for these two operating systems, it will be really helpful."

"My whole team is saying that they would rate technical support a three or four out of ten."

"Sometimes, the process is unsuccessful when we attempt to reset a device and wipe the data using Intune."

"Microsoft needs to enhance device-level security, as sometimes when using Microsoft Intune, the device's operating system becomes stuck and requires a full uninstall to remove the Intune bug."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button. Currently, we have to sift through different groups to block a device. It would be nice if Scalefusion allowed me to block without moving the device to a different profile. Another helpful feature they could add is the ability to migrate from one MDM to another. I'd also appreciate more extensive cloud storage. They give you 1 GB by default, but sometimes that's not enough."

"It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button."

"One area for improvement could be streamlining permissions during initial device setup, especially for corporate-owned devices, to reduce manual user interaction and expedite deployment."

"There could be a feature for user ID management."

"There are some limitations with the remote control feature, and the interface occasionally experiences issues."

"They should improve the lockdown feature."

"The price of this solution is high when you compare it with Microsoft Intune."

"The solution could use better reporting."

"We're deploying an application upgrade. We can't do more than three or four devices at once, and we don't know if the device actually received the upgrade. There's no indicator saying it's 100 percent complete until everything is done. Let's say I work East to West. I work on the East Coast and I want to confirm it was done with the upgrades in that region. I wouldn't know until I actually went into it. There's no indicator telling me that it's complete."

"They don't have systems that are built for redundancy. You have one database that manages everything and, if that database crashes, you have a problem."

"Support for Windows Phone 8.1 Improve time to market"

More SOTI MobiControl cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is cheap, but as compared to Google, it is costly. Google is cheaper, but quality-wise, Microsoft Intune is better."

"Our enterprise agreement includes Microsoft Intune at no additional cost."

"Intune is moderately expensive. You can get the license bundled with Office 365 E3 or E5 licenses. The E5s are a bit expensive, but you get some cheaper solutions with Intune."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis."

"I don't have any problem as far as cost is concerned. It is bundled with our license."

"The pricing for Microsoft Intune is reasonable. Our clients are satisfied."

"The pricing is not cheap, especially with inflation. They've had to increase their prices. It's not excessive, but alright."

"Its price is fair. It's a normal price. It isn't too expensive or too cheap."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"There are solutions that can be more aggressively priced, but they may not provide all that SOTI does. It's a matrix regarding what feature you use. You need to compare the features you use and what you are willing to pay for them... SOTI's pricing is okay. It's in the middle... They can provide more aggressive pricing once you start to have a lot of licenses."

"I thought pricing was kind of high, but I believe that Soti is probably the best out there for this type of software, so there's not much I can do about that. The licensing is annual, per device."

"The pricing is reasonable and the licensing model is very reasonable when compared to some of the competitors in the market. I can speak directly regarding Intune, which is very expensive compared to SOTI."

"It's a little bit expensive."

"Its pricing policy is not stable. The licensing is on a one-yearly, two-yearly, or three-yearly basis. There is no monthly fee."

"We have annual licenses to use this solution."

"The product is less expensive than one of its competitors."

"You need to secure a license on a per-device basis."

More SOTI MobiControl pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	193
Midsize Enterprise	61
Large Enterprise	186

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SOTI MobiControl?

I rate the pricing as an eight, which indicates it is on the more expensive side. However, I am not responsible for b...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SOTI MobiControl?

The improvements can depend on various factors. Since I handle the technical side, I'm not concerned about the costin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SOTI MobiControl?

The typical use case for SOTI MobiControl is to manage mobile devices.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 11% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

NinjaOne vs Scalefusion

Compared 6% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Scalefusion

Compared 6% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Scalefusion

Compared 5% of the time

42Gears SureMDM vs Scalefusion

Compared 5% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Scalefusion

Compared 5% of the time

More Scalefusion Competitors

Workspace ONE UEM vs SOTI MobiControl

Compared 17% of the time

42Gears SureMDM vs SOTI MobiControl

Compared 11% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs SOTI MobiControl

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Enterprise Mobility + Security vs SOTI MobiControl

Compared 6% of the time

Samsung Knox vs SOTI MobiControl

Compared 5% of the time

More SOTI MobiControl Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

July 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Device Management (MDM)

July 2026

Download Scalefusion product report

Buyer's Guide

SOTI MobiControl

July 2026

Download SOTI MobiControl product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

No data available

MobiControl

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Scalefusion offers an efficient solution for mobile device management, providing robust features tailored to the needs of businesses looking to manage, control, and secure their devices effectively.

Scalefusion supports a wide range of devices and operating systems, enabling businesses to implement a security-first approach while streamlining IT operations. It's designed to simplify management tasks, allowing admins to focus on strategic initiatives rather than everyday device management challenges. Scalefusion is noted for its flexibility, offering capabilities that enhance productivity across different sectors.

What are the key features of Scalefusion?

Kiosk Mode: Enables lockdown of devices to single or multiple applications, ensuring secure and focused use.
Application Management: Facilitates the deployment and update of apps across devices from a unified platform.
Content Management: Provides streamlined distribution and management of corporate files and documents.
Remote Support: Allows IT teams to troubleshoot devices in real-time, minimizing downtime.
Compliance Control: Ensures devices meet company security policies and regulations.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Provides robust measures to protect sensitive data against unauthorized access.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces time and resources spent on device management, allowing focus on business growth.
Cost Savings: Minimizes operational costs by improving resource allocation and reducing device downtime.
Scalability: Adapts to the scaling needs of businesses without compromise in management quality.
User Satisfaction: Streamlines device usage fostering higher employee satisfaction and productivity.

Scalefusion has been effectively implemented across specific industries, such as logistics, retail, and healthcare. In logistics, it assists in tracking and managing field devices to ensure efficient operations. In retail, it supports secure transactions and customer interactions through kiosk implementations. The healthcare sector benefits from its robust compliance control, ensuring that sensitive patient data remains secure.

Scalefusion

SOTI MobiControl efficiently manages devices, offering remote control, geofencing, and secure content distribution, supporting Android, Windows, Linux, and IoT devices.

SOTI MobiControl streamlines device management with features like app deployment, file sync, and remote configurations. It supports comprehensive device security and enhanced operational efficiency, crucial for diverse platforms including mobile and IoT devices. However, its interface and documentation could improve, and challenges in custom reporting and containerization exist. Enhancements in integration with iOS, Windows, and training materials could increase value for users.

What are the most important features of SOTI MobiControl?

Remote Device Control: Allows management of devices from any location.
Geofencing: Creates virtual boundaries to manage devices geographically.
App Deployment: Simplifies deployment of applications across devices.
File Sync: Ensures synchronization of files seamlessly.
Device Configuration Management: Manages and adjusts device settings remotely.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from SOTI MobiControl?

Device Security: Provides robust protection for managed devices.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies device management tasks.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses by optimizing device usage.
Remote Management: Enhances operational efficiency by allowing control from anywhere.

SOTI MobiControl is implemented in sectors like transportation, retail, and logistics for device management, software deployment, and security. It facilitates communication and inventory management, significantly aiding companies in application control, patch management, and reducing manual processes. Supporting both on-premise and cloud deployment, it caters to medium to large enterprises.

SOTI

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Magna, Scania, Darya - Varia, Radisson Blu, Slice, Veezu

Citizen Mexico, Sanctuary Housing, PENINSULA HOTELS, East Orange High School, Andrews Distributing, Amey Plc, American Airlines

Buyer's Guide

SOTI MobiControl vs. Scalefusion

June 2026

Free Report: SOTI MobiControl vs. Scalefusion

Find out what your peers are saying about SOTI MobiControl vs. Scalefusion and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SOTI MobiControl vs. Scalefusion report.

See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors, best Mobile Device Management (MDM) vendors, and best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.