ScienceLogic vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

ScienceLogic and Splunk are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. ScienceLogic is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.4, while Splunk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6. ScienceLogic holds a 1.8% mindshare in IM, compared to Splunk’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

ScienceLogic

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

2,268 Views
1,665 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 50 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

1,711 Views
1,010 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 6, 2025

ScienceLogic and Splunk Observability Cloud are key players in the infrastructure monitoring space. ScienceLogic seems to have an advantage due to its extensive customization and multi-tenant capabilities, albeit at a higher complexity in setup compared to Splunk's straightforward log analysis and application monitoring strengths.

Features: ScienceLogic offers enhanced customization for dashboards and monitoring templates, allowing for deep visibility into clients' environments. Its multi-tenant capability is advantageous for managing various customers on a single platform. Users also note its flexibility and integration possibilities as significant contributors to infrastructure monitoring success. Splunk Observability Cloud is strong in performance monitoring and log analysis, providing efficient dashboard creation for monitoring applications and services. Its ability to visualize data across cloud environments is a notable feature, though its customization is less extensive than ScienceLogic.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could enhance its reporting and API capabilities and simplify its interface for better usability. Users experience challenges in setup monitoring and event management, indicating a demand for improved functionalities. Adding more straightforward integration processes and refined support for network and SNMP trap processing would be beneficial. Splunk Observability Cloud faces criticism for its high pricing. Improving microservices scaling, resource correlation, and user interface customization is necessary. Users also suggest streamlining deployment and enhancing documentation to make the tool's features more accessible.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is recognized for flexible on-premises and hybrid deployments. It is well-regarded for robust customer service and technical support, although deployment complexity is acknowledged but manageable. Customers appreciate the personalized and proactive support. Splunk Observability Cloud supports diverse environments, including public clouds, and is praised for effective support across its cloud and on-premises operations. Yet, deployment complexities and premium pricing are noted concerns, despite commendable cloud compatibility.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers variable pricing models but can become costly with increasing device counts. However, its comprehensive functionality is deemed worth the investment by many users who report solid ROI, though it may be out of reach for some medium-sized businesses. Splunk Observability Cloud is considered expensive, with a pricing model based on data volume rather than device count, affecting cost efficiency but justifiable for handling significant data volumes. Both platforms promise potential ROI through efficient issue resolution and enhanced infrastructure visibility, positioning pricing as a pivotal differentiator.

To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

24th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (27th), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (7th)

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (11th), Container Management (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"Power packs."

"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."

"A major benefit is eliminating visibility gaps, which motivates me to consolidate tools."

"The power flow is great."

"I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

More ScienceLogic pros

"Great monitoring of network devices."

"The solution's basic visibility is one of its most valuable features. So, it is a solution that is easy to use...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."

"The most valuable thing that we have seen within our group is the ability to ingest all this raw data and have it organized in a certain way so that different groups can get effective alerting from this massive amount of raw data that is out there."

"It is a great resource for us because we have so many different data sources and to be able to aggregate that and put it through a concise dashboard or an alert really helps."

"Splunk APM helps us to find errors immediately and resolve them."

"The solution monitors attacks or unauthorized access to the information we want to protect."

"Splunk has drawn our attention to how the network is running. If there are alarms on things that are not functioning, it gives us early warning on problems that could arise."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring reduces our mean time to resolve. We are more proactive than reactive."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"They should improve their support process and add chat."

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."

More ScienceLogic cons

"There is not a lot of support for the tool's on-premises version, especially since everything is on the cloud."

"There's no standard use case available where you can see the utilization of the number of use cases I have."

"I would like to see an improvement and some innovation in the customer interface."

"We currently lack log analysis capabilities in Splunk APM."

"The solution should have more sensors regarding fiber intelligence for security measures."

"The solution's machine learning deployment is hard and should be made user-friendly."

"Splunk APM should include a better correlation between resources and infrastructure monitoring."

"Primarily, the logs in Splunk APM can be challenging to navigate and comprehend, making it difficult to understand the details within each log. Compared to other tools like LogDNA, which are more intuitive in this aspect, the logs in Splunk APM can require more effort to understand."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

"This is an expensive solution."

"The product is a bit expensive considering the competition but the company may negotiate the price."

"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."

"Splunk APM is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."

"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."

"The solution's pricing is costly."

"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

The cost is medium. It could be cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.

See all answers

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available. We sometimes encountered issues in setting up alerts. The custom detector could be m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The main purpose of using Splunk APM is to optimize our application. We use Splunk APM primarily to understand how the application works, how it uses resources, and its response time in connection ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 21% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

March 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

March 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Overview

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

ScienceLogic

Splunk Observability Cloud combines log search, data integration, and dashboards for seamless monitoring, enhancing infrastructure visibility and security. Its cloud integration and scalability support diverse environments, improving operational efficiency.

Splunk Observability Cloud offers comprehensive monitoring tools with user-friendly interfaces, enabling end-to-end infrastructure visibility. Its real-time alerting and predictive capabilities enhance security monitoring, while centralized dashboards provide cross-platform visibility. Users benefit from fast data integration and extensive insights into application performance. Despite its advantages, improvements could be made in integration with other tools, data reliability, scalability, and cost management. Users face challenges in configuration complexity and require better automation and endpoint protection features. Enhancing AI integration, alerts, and adaptation for high-throughput services could further improve usability.

What are the key features of Splunk Observability Cloud?

Log Search: Efficiently search and analyze log data for enhanced insights.
Data Integration: Fast integration across platforms for comprehensive visibility.
Custom Dashboards: Powerful and adaptable dashboards for real-time monitoring.
Cloud Integration: Seamless integration with cloud services for scalable solutions.
Application Performance Monitoring: Advanced tools for improving application performance.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Infrastructure Monitoring: Improved visibility and monitoring across infrastructure components.
Operational Efficiency: Enhancements in data analysis lead to efficient operations.
Business Resilience: Supports adaptability and swift responses to changing needs.
Security Management: Enhances threat identification and response through real-time alerts.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting compliance and auditing requirements effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for application performance monitoring and infrastructure metrics. Its ability to track incidents and analyze machine data benefits network infrastructure, while distributed tracing and log analysis aid in tackling security threats. Organizations often integrate it for compliance and auditing purposes, enhancing visibility into network traffic and optimizing performance.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

March 2025

Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.