Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Certificate Manager vs Thales Authenticators comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Certificate Manager
Ranking in Authentication Systems
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Certificate Management Software (3rd)
Thales Authenticators
Ranking in Authentication Systems
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of CyberArk Certificate Manager is 1.8%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thales Authenticators is 2.3%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
CyberArk Certificate Manager1.8%
Thales Authenticators2.3%
Other95.9%
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2600361 - PeerSpot reviewer
Global Security Systems Consultant at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
The reporting capabilities are crucial in helping us meet regulatory compliance requirements
Certificate Manager is generally user-friendly. While administrators require some training, the end-user experience is intuitive. Certificate Manager provides comprehensive user guides with step-by-step instructions, but most users can easily navigate the platform and complete tasks without consulting documentation. The automation capabilities have significantly improved our workflow by automating the installation of certificates on servers, endpoints, load balancers, and cloud workspaces. This automation has eliminated the need to manually install certificates on each device, saving us valuable time and resources. Automation helps reduce human error by providing a clear validation trail. For example, within a certificate object, we can easily see where a certificate was installed, such as in AWS or on a load balancer. This automated validation ensures accurate tracking and eliminates the need for manual verification, which can be unreliable and prone to errors. Certificate Manager simplifies certificate renewal by offering a seamless process that allows users to renew certificates with a single click. We saw the benefits of Certificate Manager immediately after deploying it, as our previous solution was inadequate. The reporting feature alone significantly improved, allowing us to track every certificate. Certificate Manager's discovery feature also proved invaluable, identifying certificates on our systems that we were unaware of. This allowed us to import them into Certificate Manager, monitor their expiration dates, assign owners, and communicate with those owners about renewals or compliance issues, such as the use of self-signed certificates. By proactively addressing these issues, we ensured the security and compliance of our certificates from day one. Certificate Manager's reporting capabilities are crucial in helping us meet regulatory compliance requirements. Their signing algorithm report allows us to scan every certificate within our organization to identify any out-of-compliance, such as self-signed certificates. This enables us to locate the certificate owner, have them rectify the issue, and update the certificate in Certificate Manager. The comprehensive reporting facilitates the identification and resolution of any compliance concerns. Certificate Manager's reporting mechanisms help us reduce our mean time to respond by quickly identifying and addressing compliance issues and compromised certificates. We can locate the certificate owner and promptly fix any non-compliant certificates. In the event of a compromised certificate, Certificate Manager enables us to create a new one swiftly, deploy it to servers or cloud workspaces, and renew and install it within minutes. Certificate Manager helped us reduce risk exposure by migrating all identified self-signed certificates to trusted certificate authorities during our discovery process, mitigating any associated risks. We would be overwhelmed if we had to install all these certificates manually on each endpoint. Certificate Manager automates this process, eliminating the need for constant monitoring and freeing up our time significantly. With Certificate Manager, we simply initiate the process and let it run, saving us the equivalent of two additional employees. While Certificate Managers services come at a cost, the increased efficiency ultimately saves us the expense of hiring two additional employees. Certificate Manager has a minimal learning curve. New users can typically log in and navigate the product without guidance, with only about 10 percent requiring minor assistance.
Gustavo Merighi - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation and Telecommunications Analyst at Grupo Energisa
Has an easy-to-use management interface and a straightforward initial setup process
Our primary use cases include multifactor authentication for VPN connections and access to security tools like jump servers and firewalls. We also use it to enhance security measures in an enterprise environment The most valuable feature is the YAML 2.0 integration. It has an easy-to-use…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Venafi is the automation that helps save time and reduce human error."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is their certificate discovery."
"The support is definitely great. What I like best about Venafi is that it's very easy to get somebody on a call and get any of my questions answered. That's probably the biggest thing. Besides the fact that it's a mature product and it works, the support is a big deal."
"We have reduced 80% to 90% of our outages with Venafi, which impacts the revenue substantially."
"Venafi's technical support is impressively fast."
"Venafi's automation capabilities were significant, as they allowed us to automate certificate rotation and deployment effectively."
"Venafi solved the issue of many misplaced internal certificates, as we know that at one place we can get all the information, and the problem of notifications about expiring certificates is resolved, improving our overall system for Expedia."
"The reporting analysis is what I liked the most about it; that was the nicest thing about it—it helped keep track of certificates and their status and where we needed to make improvements, update, replace things."
"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."
"The technical support services are good."
"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."
"Scalable and stable."
"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."
 

Cons

"Regarding stability, I observed that in the last year, CyberArk Certificate Manager was down two to three times without any notification."
"Venafi excels in automating certificate rotation and deployment but could enhance its offering by improving support for hardware security modules like Fortanix and providing more advanced, out-of-the-box integrations with public certificate authorities for DNS re-verification."
"Currently, specific processes require manual installations due to the lack of built-in integrations."
"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations. They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we prefer on-premises solutions due to regulatory concerns."
"I would like to see included in the next release of Venafi integration with the cloud HSM's, Hardware Security Module. Additionally, I would say other cloud services, because it's not only cloud that's essential. If you have a customer that has a lot of their IT moved into cloud, integration with different cloud services is always an area to improve."
"Venafi could enhance its offerings by providing more automation features."
"Venafi excels in automating certificate rotation and deployment but could enhance its offering by improving support for hardware security modules like Fortanix and providing more advanced, out-of-the-box integrations with public certificate authorities for DNS re-verification."
"Venafi's overall installation could be made easier."
"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."
"The product could be improved by adding more features for sending tokens via SMS or phone calls."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
"The stability could improve."
"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model is complex, considering factors beyond the number of certificates. This complexity can make our payments to Venafi challenging if costs continue to rise. It is good but more expensive than the competitors."
"Venafi's pricing appears to be competitive within the market."
"Thales is more expensive than its competitors."
"There is an annual licensing fee."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Performing Arts
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise11
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Venafi?
The pricing is minimal compared to other platforms. There are no problems regarding pricing.
What needs improvement with Venafi?
It would be better if they could notify each member whenever any ongoing activity is happening. I have been using it for the past four years, and I haven't received any messages about issues on Cyb...
What advice do you have for others considering Venafi?
I didn't notice any time saved on satisfying the compliance requirements. To safeguard the infrastructure from any attacks, I suggest that everyone should maintain individual certificates for their...
What needs improvement with Thales Authenticators?
Currently, the solution fulfills our requirements. We are very satisfied with its features, and do not have any specific ideas for improvement right now. Perhaps, in the future, three-factor authen...
What is your primary use case for Thales Authenticators?
Our employees, whether working on-site or remotely, use Thales Authenticators for two-factor authentication to log in to their laptops or PCs. This is our primary use case.
What advice do you have for others considering Thales Authenticators?
From our past years of experience, the solution is very smooth, and we have had a good experience with it. We would definitely recommend Thales to others for its reliability and features. I'd rate ...
 

Also Known As

Venafi
Gemalto Ezio, Ezio, Gemalto Authenticators, SafeNet Authentication Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco
Standard Chartered Bank (SCB)
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Thales Authenticators and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.