TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs webMethods.io comparison

TIBCO and IBM are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. TIBCO is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. TIBCO holds a 3.9% mindshare in E, compared to IBM’s 10.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of TIBCO users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Read 12 TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus reviews

818 Views
555 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

2,134 Views
1,518 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and webMethods.io are competitors in the enterprise integration field. TIBCO holds an advantage in pricing and support, while webMethods.io excels in robust functionality.

Features: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus offers strong integration capabilities, powerful error handling, and stability. webMethods.io provides advanced cloud integration, scalability, and extensive feature sets for sophisticated integration needs.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO could enhance its scalability options, user interface design, and overall performance optimization. webMethods.io may need to refine its cost structure, reduce complexity for new users, and improve native support for non-standard integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO is recognized for its flexible deployment model along with robust customer support for a smooth implementation. Conversely, webMethods.io, with its cloud-native platform, enables quicker deployments and an intuitive user experience, appealing to businesses focusing on speed.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is praised for competitive pricing and a beneficial ROI, making it suitable for budget-conscious enterprises. In contrast, webMethods.io requires a higher initial investment but justifies this cost with strong ROI owing to its expansive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), API Management (10th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is 3.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 10.7%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

Mustofa Yonus

Cheif Specialist- Licensing Systems at Roads & Transport Authority

A robust product that needs to improve the functionality it offers related to API lifecycle management

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a six to seven out of ten. My company consists of around 7000 employees, and we use the solution as an integrated service in around 300 to 400 systems, both internally and externally, making it a huge number. Our company uses the solution every minute and every second, and we can't function without it.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance. This is why, for most customers who have to deal with big files, I suggest that they use a product other than ActiveTransfer. I would like to note that this problem mainly concerns large files that undergo extra operations, such assigning, unassigning, or file translation. When these operations take place on large files, ActiveTransfer will use up a lot of resources. Within the product itself, I also believe that there is room for improvement in terms of optimization when it comes to general performance. I suspect that the issues underlying poor optimization are because it is all developed in Java. That is, all the objects and functions that are used need to be better organized, especially when it comes to big files but also overall. webMethods ActiveTransfer was born as an ESB to handle messages, and these messages were typically very short, i.e. small in size. A message is data that you have to send to an application, where it must be received in real-time and possibly processed or acknowledged elsewhere in the system as well. So, because it was initially designed for small messages, it struggles with performance when presented with very large files. All this to say, I suggest that they have an engineer reevaluate the architecture of the product in order to consider cases where large files are sent, and not only small ones. As for new features, compared to other products in the market, I think Software AG should be more up to date when it comes to extra protocol support, especially those protocols that other solutions have included in their products by default. Whenever we need to add an unsupported protocol, we have to go through the effort of custom development in order to work with it. Also, all the banks are obligated to migrate to the new standards, and big companies are all handling translations and operating their libraries with the new protocol formats. But webMethods ActiveTransfer doesn't seem to be keeping up with this evolution. Thus, they should aim to be more compliant in future, along the lines of their competitors such as IBM and Primeur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust."

"It is easy to develop. It has a very wide range of features. The older versions are very stable, and there are no issues with the product."

"The most attractive and beneficial feature is the ease of development."

"The solution is very stable."

"TIBCO has the platform in terms of speed and ease of use."

"The most valuable features are the monitoring, ease of use, and easy to understand development GUI."

"The technology is really easy to learn."

"The stability of this solution is excellent."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus pros

"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a good solution for interacting with outside of the organization. We can integrate the solutions with multiple outside the organization."

"EDI is robust and integration with SAP is good."

"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is its reliability. It has a lot of great documentation from the service providers. Additionally, it is easy to use."

"We have found the pricing of the solution to be fair."

"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."

"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."

"The product is very stable."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Migration to cloud solutions or products should be made convenient, transparent, and easily understandable."

"The stability of their latest version is not on par with their classic version 5.X."

"The solution is very expensive when you use multiple components, it would b better if this could be reduced."

"The initial setup process could be easier."

"If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs."

"In the next release, there should be improvements made to the API manager."

"I don't like the product's API management platform, as it doesn't offer users enough functionality to help with API lifecycle management, making it a product that is way behind its competitors."

"In the configuration, where we need to customize, it takes more time that we expect it to, ideally."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus cons

"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."

"The initial setup of the webMethods Integration Server is not easy but it gets easier once you know it. It is tiresome but not difficult."

"The configuring of the JWT token would be improved as it is a confusing process. We require more information on this part of the solution."

"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."

"For code version control, you need to use some external software."

"We'd like for them to open up to a more cloud-based solution that could offer more flexibility and maybe a better rules engine or more integration with rules engines."

"The Software AG Designer could be more memory-efficient or CPU-efficient so that we can use it with middle-spec hardware."

"I would like to see the price improve."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When it comes to cost, TIBCO is much more competitive than a product like Pega."

"The price is on the higher side. For the same price, if I go to the previous version, I would have got a lot more capacity with similar kinds of features."

"The licensing cost is a challenge for quite a few customers."

"Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive."

"Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."

"The biggest issue disadvantage of TIBCO is that it is expensive."

"Its cost depends on the use cases."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."

"This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

"It is worth the cost."

"The solution's development license is free for three to six months. We have to pay for other things."

"It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

I don't like the product's API management platform, as it doesn't offer users enough functionality to help with API lifecycle management, making it a product that is way behind its competitors. The...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 56% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 24% of the time

Mule ESB vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 20% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

March 2025

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

March 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a lightweight enterprise service bus that helps organizations bridge the mediation gap in their SOA infrastructure. It reduces complexity and increases flexibility and reuse by replacing hard-coded service dependencies with configuration, and can be used to onboard services from a third-party environment or a TIBCO-based infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus provides service mediation capabilities to the TIBCO ActiveMatrix SOA platform. Service mediation allows you to adapt to changing requirements for developing mediation flows.

TIBCO

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Colonial Life, CTBC Bank, New World Mobility, QUALCOMM, Swisscom Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Tata Teleservices, Telecom Italia

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Free Report: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.