TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs webMethods.io comparison

TIBCO and IBM are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. TIBCO is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. TIBCO holds a 3.9% mindshare in E, compared to IBM’s 10.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of TIBCO users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Read 12 TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus reviews

736 Views
736 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

9,897 Views
1,781 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and webMethods.io are competitors in the enterprise integration field. TIBCO holds an advantage in pricing and support, while webMethods.io excels in robust functionality.

Features: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus offers strong integration capabilities, powerful error handling, and stability. webMethods.io provides advanced cloud integration, scalability, and extensive feature sets for sophisticated integration needs.

Room for Improvement: TIBCO could enhance its scalability options, user interface design, and overall performance optimization. webMethods.io may need to refine its cost structure, reduce complexity for new users, and improve native support for non-standard integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO is recognized for its flexible deployment model along with robust customer support for a smooth implementation. Conversely, webMethods.io, with its cloud-native platform, enables quicker deployments and an intuitive user experience, appealing to businesses focusing on speed.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is praised for competitive pricing and a beneficial ROI, making it suitable for budget-conscious enterprises. In contrast, webMethods.io requires a higher initial investment but justifies this cost with strong ROI owing to its expansive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (9th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is 3.9%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 10.9%, up from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

Mustofa Yonus

Cheif Specialist- Licensing Systems at Roads & Transport Authority

A robust product that needs to improve the functionality it offers related to API lifecycle management

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a six to seven out of ten. My company consists of around 7000 employees, and we use the solution as an integrated service in around 300 to 400 systems, both internally and externally, making it a huge number. Our company uses the solution every minute and every second, and we can't function without it.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very stable."

"The technology is really easy to learn."

"The most attractive and beneficial feature is the ease of development."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust."

"The most valuable features are the monitoring, ease of use, and easy to understand development GUI."

"The product’s most valuable feature is stability."

"TIBCO has the platform in terms of speed and ease of use."

"It's very stable and reliable."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus pros

"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."

"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."

"It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an easy way to expose REST services is also very interesting. It offers the possibility to connect over GMS to synchronize message brokers."

"The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation."

"How simple it is to create new solutions."

"It's a good tool, and it has a stable messaging broker."

"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."

"ActiveTransfer lets us maintain the file in the staging area before we transfer it. After that, we can remove the file to make sure that the reconciliation process is done. Sometimes we will zip and unzip the files, but if we have a GKB file, we often ignore it."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Our version does not have cloud capabilities."

"The initial setup process could be easier."

"The intermediate version that we are using has stability issues. These stability issues should be resolved, but it seems like TIBCO is not focusing on resolving these issues. The resolution timelines are quite high even for high-priority incidents. Its price should be lower. Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."

"Issues with the support, the fees, and the termination of the professional services are reasons we are looking for other solutions."

"We'd like to see improvements in product support."

"In the configuration, where we need to customize, it takes more time that we expect it to, ideally."

"The solution is very expensive when you use multiple components, it would b better if this could be reduced."

"Migration to cloud solutions or products should be made convenient, transparent, and easily understandable."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus cons

"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."

"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."

"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."

"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."

"Technical support is an area where they can improve."

"This is a great solution and the vendor could improve the marketing of the solution to be able to reach more clients."

"webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience."

"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The biggest issue disadvantage of TIBCO is that it is expensive."

"Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive."

"When it comes to cost, TIBCO is much more competitive than a product like Pega."

"Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."

"The licensing cost is a challenge for quite a few customers."

"The price is on the higher side. For the same price, if I go to the previous version, I would have got a lot more capacity with similar kinds of features."

"I signed a three-year deal with them. It is a yearly locked-in price for the next three years."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers."

"I do think webMethods is coming under increasing pressure when it comes to their price-to-feature value proposition. It's probably the single biggest strategic risk they have. They're very expensive in their industry. They've been raising the price recently, especially when compared with their competitors."

"The price of webMethods Integration Server isn't that high from an enterprise context, but open-source ESB solutions will always be the cheapest."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"It is worth the cost."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?

I don't like the product's API management platform, as it doesn't offer users enough functionality to help with API lifecycle management, making it a product that is way behind its competitors. The...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 51% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 25% of the time

Mule ESB vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Compared 23% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus

June 2025

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

June 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

ActiveMatrix Service Bus

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a lightweight enterprise service bus that helps organizations bridge the mediation gap in their SOA infrastructure. It reduces complexity and increases flexibility and reuse by replacing hard-coded service dependencies with configuration, and can be used to onboard services from a third-party environment or a TIBCO-based infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus provides service mediation capabilities to the TIBCO ActiveMatrix SOA platform. Service mediation allows you to adapt to changing requirements for developing mediation flows.

TIBCO

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Colonial Life, CTBC Bank, New World Mobility, QUALCOMM, Swisscom Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Tata Teleservices, Telecom Italia

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Free Report: TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.