Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trend Micro ServerProtect comparison

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (17th)

Trend Micro ServerProtect

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

47th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 1.6%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Micro ServerProtect is 0.7%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Venugopal Potumudi

Senior Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Nov 7, 2022

Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Having used Trend Micro as well, I would rate Trend Micro higher. However, I would still choose this product as a second option. When we recommend a product, we would recommend something based on the fit of the product and customer requirements. We worked with Defender, we worked with Trend Micro, and we worked with McAfee. All of them almost overlap in multiple use cases. That said, we do see the customer IT strategy and where they're going, and they are adopting Azure more. We know there are certain limitations in their landscape where there may be some old legacy systems, and in that case, then we would either switch back to McAfee or Trend Micro instead of Defender.

Read full review

Syed Azimuddin

Senior Specialist - Security Solutions at Mannai

Mar 3, 2020

Realtime intelligent end-to-end detection and protection from malware in a highly versatile product

From a technical perspective, I think ServerProtect is one of the best security products on the market. It is a mature product that already has most features that any product of this type has. What can be improved is that the cost is very high. So I feel that the cost should be reduced, even if it is justified. One thing that I would like to see as an additional feature is just a custom sandbox within the solution itself. So instead of having to go and use an additional sandbox for testing, you could have a custom sandbox integrated directly into the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."

"Trellix integrates well with most SIEM and data classification solutions."

"The platform's most valuable features are AI capabilities and its quick updates."

"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."

"It has a feature called Isolation. If a device is compromised, we can connect it to our SOC, and no one would be able to access it. This way we can limit the damage to the network while we are investigating."

"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."

"The setup is not that complex. It takes five to ten minutes to set up."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

"Performance is very good."

"It helps us quickly address potential issues and provides us with valuable insights."

"The most valuable features are the anti-malware and antivirus capabilities."

"The solution allows centralized administration"

"I use this solution for data blocking, software protection, and frame protection."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"Allows us to protect OneDrive and SharePoint, and emails too."

"ServerProtect's best feature is virtual patching, which takes care of patching even if your servers aren't updated with the latest threat definitions."

More Trend Micro ServerProtect pros

Cons

"Sometimes, one might face issues with the scalability of the product. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."

"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."

"The performance could be better. I noticed that it slows down a bit."

"The solution needs to work on memory consumption. It is too high."

"Malware detection can be better. It doesn't have support and detection for the recent malware, but it has a compensatory control where it can do the behavior-based assessment and alert you when there is something malicious or unexpected. For example, when a certain user is executing the privilege command, which is not normal. These dynamic detections are good, and they compensate for malware detection."

"In some cases, the detection part was not accurate enough. We opened a few cases for the vendor to help us with some miscategorized findings on the endpoints. There were some false positive detections, and we had to work with the vendor to get them tested. We even had some incidents that were not detected. It was a black box type of solution for us."

"We would like to solution to offer better security."

"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

"Lacking analytics and a machine learning technique."

"Notifications are not very good with Trend Micro."

"The endpoint protection could always be stronger."

"I would like to see SMS notifications sent as alerts, in case we do not have access to our email."

"One thing I have been facing is that some fake threats have appeared that even Trend Micro was not able to clear up. It couldn't tell you why these threats are happening, where they are coming from and what the costs are."

"We found that when we push Trend Micro from the console to our client's PCs, we need to manually restart the PC. I have 500 users and the manual input is time-consuming."

"The cost is very high and it should be lower to be more competitive."

"Integration with different platforms could be an area for improvement in Trend Micro ServerProtect, e.g. it needs more integration. It could also be more secure and more stable. In the next release, this solution should also include more EDR visibility."

More Trend Micro ServerProtect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is not a cheap solution...I don't think any costs are involved in the maintenance of the solution."

"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."

"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."

"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

"The product is available at a reasonable price"

"Pricing is based on the components you choose from the suite to run in your installation. Costs vary by the number of features and the number of servers."

"Pricewise, this product is okay."

"This product has an annual subscription, but also offers MSP options."

"In terms of price, the solution is in the middle; it's neither the cheapest nor the most expensive. I rate it three out of five for cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

What do you like most about Trend Micro ServerProtect?

The initial setup is very straightforward.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro ServerProtect?

The product is available at a reasonable price. The product can probably be purchased for INR 800 per year.

What needs improvement with Trend Micro ServerProtect?

The solution should provide features to block devices, specific IPs or URLs.

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 17% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 12% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 28% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 17% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 9% of the time

More Trend Micro ServerProtect Competitors

Product Reports

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Trend Micro ServerProtect

Download Trend Micro ServerProtect product report

Also Known As

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Storage, ServerProtect, ServerProtect for Storage

Learn More

Trellix

Trend Micro

Overview

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Storage, powered by XGen security, leverages a blend of cross-generational threat protection techniques to safeguard a wide range of network attached storage systems by detecting and removing viruses and spyware in real time. This comprehensive storage security uses the industry-standard ICAP protocol to complement support for traditional RPC communication protocols. To simplify network protection for EMC, NetApp, and Hitachi Data Systems storage systems, ServerProtect for Storage provides automatic, incremental security updates and centralized management of servers via a web-based console.

Sample Customers

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Siemens

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect