JIRA Service Management Reviews

For every project planning, we divide each project into different epics based on the milestones. Then for every epic, we create stories and tasks to complete within a two-week sprint cycle. After the two weeks, we have a review session with the clients to showcase our progress. That's how we are doing it.

The tool is scalable. It is not mainly about administrative efforts, however, as a working user, it is easier to create multiple stories and epics. For every task we are working on, the project manager can see the status once we update the stories mentioned. It helps overall project management to understand what the progress is and if there are any blockers.

One thing I would suggest is that before we create an epic, we mention the required stories in its description. Then AI could directly create those stories instead of doing it manually inside the table, so that integration can occur.

I have been using it for more than six years.

Instability happens sometimes - although not frequently.

The tool is scalable. As a user, it is easier for me to create multiple stories and epics, which aids in scalability.

The company would have a new project assigned to it, and the team can work on it. The only effort required is during project planning. We need to organize the stories and other details, however, instead of using Excel, we can use Jira board to prepare everything. 

I have not worked directly on the pricing.

For code changes, we are using Bitbucket, not Atlassian directly. We have Bitbucket with Atlassian, and that is how it is integrated.

It's a good experience. I rate it ten out of ten.

I use the solution in my company as it is a good project management tool.

The tool's ticketing is very good. It uses an agile methodology for delegating tickets, workload, reports, and tracking.

The product does not allow customization of reports. Only specific out-of-the-box reports are available, so you cannot customize reports very easily, which is a drawback. It is meant for some complex environments, making it a tool that is not easy to use. You need to get a minimum amount of training on the system to be able to use the product.

I have been using JIRA Service Management for seven years. I am a user of the solution.

The tool's stability is very good.

The product is scalable only if you purchase the premium license for the tool.

The solution's technical support is good. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

The product's initial setup phase is complex since it cannot be managed without vendor support.

For deployment, the packages are not readily available for download. One has to purchase the license to be able to use the product, making the complex process for which support should be made available from JIRA Service Management's team.

The solution can be deployed in less than an hour by one person.

Vendor support is required to take care of the product's deployment.

In terms of the tool's ROI, I feel everything is good. With the use of the tool, one can save a lot of manpower and time.

It is a cheaply priced product.

The automation capabilities of the product are limited. You cannot integrate with each and everything. Within NetSuite and Confluence, JIRA Service Management's integration capabilities are easy to manage, but with some other tools, it can get complex.

The product is not easy to integrate with other tools.

It is easy to integrate the product with the AI part. AI helps with tracking purposes, management purposes, reports, and project execution. The tool is used a lot, making it a very useful product.

My company uses JIRA Service Management to collaborate with Confluence.

I believe it is a complete package and one of the best project management tools in the market.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We use JIRA for user support, specifically first-level user support. 

Additionally, we use it to plan project steps. With the Carbon dashboard, it is possible to break the project into multiple steps. You can review what is done, what is set to be done, and what has been completed during the predefined time slots. For ITSM processes, we primarily use it for access processes. 

We also utilize its automation capabilities, such as automatically creating JIRA tickets from monitoring tools during batch execution errors.

JIRA allows us to easily monitor what the team is doing and which subjects team members are working on. The dashboard feature enables us to see task statuses and facilitates task management through drag-and-drop functionality. This has improved our productivity by making it easier to track tasks and team activities.

The most valuable feature compared to JPS is that JIRA is focused on user support and project management. It is easy to communicate with end users through the application, and for specific tasks, it's possible to break them into smaller tasks and link them together. Features like the dashboard and drag-and-drop functionality for updating task statuses make it user-friendly. 

The ability to create a Deep Bucket branch or link tasks from JIRA to another JIRA is also beneficial. Automation capabilities allow for automatic ticket creation using monitoring tools.

It would be beneficial if we could turn comments into subtasks or other JIRA tickets directly. If this feature could be added, it would enhance the user experience.

I have been working with JIRA and ServiceNow for the past three years.

In our environment, JIRA is very stable. We have different JIRA instances for testing, and with our architecture, the application remains stable except during major changes or updates. Daily operations are smooth and fluent.

As an end user, I find it difficult to comment on scalability. However, our dedicated deployment team manages the architectural aspects to ensure scalability.

I have not had any interaction with JIRA's technical support, so I cannot comment on their customer service.

Positive

Previously, I worked with GLPI for about six years before switching. I stopped using GLPI because I changed jobs and moved to a position that uses JIRA and ServiceNow.

From my point of view, as an end user, the initial setup was slightly challenging due to the new user interface compared to GLPI. However, over time, it became more user-friendly, and I discovered many good options.

A dedicated team focuses on maintaining the JIRA infrastructure. When new options are needed, they evaluate and include them, making the experience better for end users.

We have seen improvements in productivity since it is easier to understand team activities and task statuses through the JIRA dashboard. Comparing task management features, JIRA significantly outperforms GLPI.

I do not have information about the pricing or licensing cost of JIRA. The last time I checked, there was a cloud version available for subscription.

For a small enterprise or team, GLPI may be a suitable option due to its free version. However, for a larger, more stable, and highly improved solution, I would recommend JIRA. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We use Jira Service Management (JSM) to manage tickets. 

It enables us to track, monitor, and manage user requests from initiation to resolution. We use it for the end-to-end process. We can add comments, and close requests., so our primary use case for JSM is ticketing. 

The interface is good and easy to use. We can track, monitor, and get all the details we need from the end-user's point of view for any service request.

The search function could be improved. We have to search a certain way. There is no generic search, it is more object-oriented search. The interface could also be more user-friendly. 

So, the interface and search could be improved.

Additionally, I would like to see more accessibility. It would also be great if there was a Jira mobile app.

We have been using JSM for more than two years. We have gained extensive experience with the tool during this time.

It is a stable solution. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. 

It is in the cloud, so it is a scalable solution. I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. It is very scalable. 

Currently, it is being used by the entire organization, but for my team, we have around 10 to 20 people who use it regularly. In total, around 50 users have access to it.

It is available, but we haven't had to use it much. We have been able to solve most of our issues on our own.

However, since it is a German-based product, there may be geographic issues with ticket routing.

They could improve it by providing support specific to the geographic location. They could also make 24/7 support available based on the availability of the support center.

Positive

We have used a few other Service Desk tools, but they are not at Jira's level.

Jira is a better tool to capture end-to-end details, which provides more visibility than the other tools.

It's easy to deploy because it's a cloud-based model. There is no on-premises deployment required if you are using the SaaS model.

If you use the SaaS model, the maintenance is taken care of by the SaaS provider.

It is one of the premium products on the market, but it is very costly, especially in the Indian market. Smaller organizations cannot afford it.

We pay monthly licensing costs. We only have to pay for the subscription model that we choose.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. It is a good tool, but it is expensive. However, it does provide the information needed to make good decisions about operational development and performance. It provides good visibility, but it is also very expensive.

As a user, I configure it with my customers. I use it for simplicity and ease of use.

Simplicity is a key aspect. It is not hard to use.

The interface could be made easier to use. While it is not the worst, there is still room for improvement.

I have used the solution for three or four years, perhaps.

I have had no problems with stability. It is 100% stable.

I was not using an administrator role, so I had no such experience with scalability issues.

I have never contacted technical support from Atlassian.

Neutral

I have had no such experience with initial setup.

It was not my responsibility as I was only a client. I did not handle the installation or purchasing.

I would rate it eight points out of ten. 

From my perspective, it was just good enough. It could be useful when it suggests what you can do for us. I am using it as an end customer, just through an interface. From my point of view, there is no specific need for automation, however, I am not an administrator. There were enough features for my needs.

We upload the tasks for the team, working with them, and they know the status of the tasks.

It helps with time management and team management of the new tasks.

The status of the tasks and the ability to assign any task to any person are valuable features.

It should be easier to log in. When I first tried to log into Jira, I faced issues accessing my company account.

I've been working with Jira Service Management for the same duration as Wazoo, which is about three months.

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.

All of the teams in the company love Jira. 

I didn’t need to call customer support.

Positive

I didn't work with other log management tools before, but I know some information about platforms like Splunk, IBM QRadar, and others.

For Jira, the setup is good. It is an eight out of ten.

I was not involved in the implementation.

I did research about platforms like LogRhythm, Splunk, and IBM QRadar.

I recommend Jira Service Management. It helps with time management and team management of the new tasks.

I would rate it a nine out of ten.

We are not using the systems we have at Jira, however, we are using the Jira environment of a client known as Electrify America. We are serving Electrify America and using their environment for managing tickets.

Apart from ticket management and workflow, the Kanban board is one of the helpful tools in Jira.

There should be some AI integrations now as AI is in the picture. One should have some risk analysis done and auto code analysis done on the ticket.

I have been working with Jira Service Management for almost three years now.

There are not really any issues. It is pretty much easier to use.

Scalability is good. I can rate it as eight out of ten.

My leads have reached out to customer support.

Positive

I have used ServiceNow. It depends on the clients. Some clients use ServiceNow, so we have to use it.

I have never dealt with the initial setup as it is done by the client side.

My lead handles the deployment.

I have had experience with ServiceNow.

Users should use the end-to-end tools related to project management. It is very useful in project management.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We use Jira Service Management to open support tickets, follow up on those tickets, and monitor the work log. We also perform some report filtering to follow up on outstanding issues. We utilize Jira Service Management's features to track the status and use customized workflows for incident management.

Jira Service Management allows us to customize dashboards to retrieve real-time data. By defining filters based on different customer types and service types, we can monitor and manage incidents effectively. This high level of customization aids in decision-making and increases visibility in tracking issues.

We have found the issue type feature particularly valuable, as it provides an out-of-the-box solution that aligns with our needs. We also appreciate the ability to customize the status workflow, surface type, and associated features, offering us high flexibility and visibility.

There is room for improvement in the user interface and the queues. Currently, the queues, which list all issues, do not allow resizing of columns and appear primitive compared to filters. Enhancing the queue interface would align it more closely with the sophisticated filter reports.

We have been using Jira Service Management for one year.

Jira Service Management's stability is very high. We have not experienced any downtime, which ensures uninterrupted operations. The performance is excellent, contributing significantly to our IT operations.

The solution is highly scalable, allowing customization and usage across different platforms, such as desktop and mobile. We haven't yet explored all features, such as allowing users to submit their tickets, so there is plenty of room for scalability in the future.

The customer service and support provided by Jira Service Management are excellent. During my setup, I encountered difficulties, and the support team responded very fast and was very helpful in resolving my inquiries.

Positive

Previously, we did not use any different solution for these use cases.

The initial setup of Jira Service Management is rated a five. There is a learning curve that needs significant time investment to understand and configure the system. However, once the platform is understood, usage and configuration become much more straightforward.

I handled the deployment process myself. Our team of six users, including myself, required involvement during the setup phase.

Jira Service Management offers high ROI due to its subscription basis and cost-effectiveness. It does not require installing a server, as it is cloud-based, further enhancing its value.

The pricing for Jira Service Management is reasonable and not expensive. It feels fair because there are opportunities for discounts through resellers.

We did not evaluate other solutions because the decision to use Jira Service Management was made by my boss.

The most time-consuming part of the setup process is learning how to customize workflows. It is crucial to thoroughly read and understand all documentation and materials provided, which significantly aids in setting up and customizing the platform.