ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus Reviews

It has resulted in a positive experience to integrate ICT project management to our IT business reality so we value the following features:

• ITIL integration
• main ITIL processes on real application
• easy to use and customize
• initial deployment and additional customization with reliable logical application
• consistently sufficient on results and data management
• possible to adapt to our business reality
• purchase order control
• parametrization and business rules allow personalized customization of this module for great control
• integration to third party applications for monitoring and reporting
• no bugs or blocks in SQL integration
• fundamental for our environment
• versatile, powerful, and simple administration
• project management integration

We had outsourced most of our IT services and to have this application as support together with the benefits of full control for implementing service delivery, gave us the confidence to implement a CSI from the very beginning.

Request management is not clearly separated form incident management and the conditions to customize this are tricky and unique for our organization.

We have been using the solution for four years.

We have had only one small stability issue which was corrected with an update.

Growing with the tool from zero cases to reach almost 1000 cases in a relatively short time, having no issues, reflects our good experience with this product.

I would rate the technical support at 8/10. Some questions were dealt with centrally and it has not been necessary to contact the local support for additional services, apart from common queries and questions.

We used Cherwell and CA Service Desk previously, through an outsourcing company.

Implementation was a bit heavy in terms of customization, but based on a well-structured ITIL process, it was a manageable import. Integration to SCCM and AD made the integration to our IT environment easier.

It is cost effective and well balanced in terms of benefit.

We evaluated Cherwell, CA Help Desk and Atlassian Service Desk.

Give them the chance to implement a demo and put in a short practice and you will see how easy and effective the solution is.

We use ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for people in our domestic holding can open any ticket from anywhere.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is meeting all my needs, it is a good solution. The integration and security are good. The solution is under-friendly.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus could improve by having better integration with Microsoft Azure.

I have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for approximately two years.

The scalability is good.

We have approximately 200 to 500 users using this solution.

The initial installation is very easy. The dashboards are not complicated.

I did the implementation with a colleague in my team.

We use five services and technical support workers that support the solution, including maintenance. 

The price of the solution is low. However, it still could be less expensive.

I would recommend ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for anyone needing a technical ticketing system. It's a powerful solution.

I rate ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus an eight out of ten.

Our primary use case for this product is providing technical support for our platform. This solution allows us to create the support tickets and forward them to different technical groups for resolution.

This product helps us with tracking customer queries, and managing the issues effectively. The auto-routing feature saves a lot of effort, where we used to spend a lot of time manually assigning things. Automatic tracking of the SLAs has also helped us become more efficient.

I have found several features to be quite valuable. The first is the support ticket auto-routing mechanism, where we are able to create business rules that are used to automatically assign the ticket to one of our predefined groups.

Another feature I find valuable is the SLA calculating, where the product is able to apply different rules based on the SLA. You can create your own SLA definitions.

The third feature that I find very useful is the solutions module, where you can create a knowledge base. It is quite helpful when the agent is taking the information directly from the end user. Using this feature, we are able to increase the percentage of cases where the customer can be helped during their initial call.

The main thing that I find lacking in the product is the ability to do custom reporting. They have canned reports, but apart from that, I am unable to define my own reports based on my needs. It requires a lot of external customization.

I would also like to see better integration with external software. It is possible, but it is tough. The APIs are not very flexible, so you really have to write a lot of code to create that integration. Opening it up for external integration would allow for easier customization of the existing autobox workflows. It would help with the user's perception.

One final issue, on the topic of business rules, is that more can be implemented. I have seen CRM systems over the past twenty years that can do much more than this. For example, you should be able to customize your workflow completely. I would like to draw my own workflow and go with that. Also, I would like to be able to write a custom feature and include it in the workflow. These things are missing from the product.

I would rate the stability of this solution to be very good.

This is a product that will scale up to, a mid-sized organization. I would say one with less than around three or four thousand items, but not more than that.

In terms of the entire architecture, I find it not so robust. It starts misbehaving after approximately five or six hundred concurrent connections. In particular, it demands a huge amount of CPU usage, as well as the other resources.

I found the initial setup to be straightforward and very simple. I would say that anybody who has a little bit of software knowledge, in terms of application installation, could take care of it without worry.

The cost of licensing is approximately ten dollars per suite, per month. When scaling up, there are a lot of other expenses such as infrastructure, the telecommunication companies, etc.

An annual maintenance contract is available for an extra cost. There are also consulting services available.  

We considered several solutions including Zendesk, Freshdesk, Freshservice, and ServiceNow. The main advantage we saw in this solution is the auto-routing feature, which was not common at this price point. The product was ranked among the top in the ranking list, and it was also one of the most stable ones when we selected it. Essentially, it had all of the features that we were looking for, which is why we chose it.

In general, it is important that the product quality is in line with the current trends in the industry, and cost-effectiveness is essential.

This is a cost-effective product that meets all of the required, basic needs for the company. The workflow for the ticketing system and the service management systems work well. Apart from that, more customizable workflows, better integration, increased robustness of the knowledge base, and more flexible integration gateways would improve the product.

I would rate this solution six out of ten.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is primarily used for service desk ticketing and instant management.

The workflow automation is the most valuable feature of this solution.

If you approve something, it automatically goes to the next person for approval.

It's quite good. 

It's quite intuitive.

The interface is not the best. The user interface could be more intuitive.

I have been working with ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for a few years.

I believe that we are working with the most recent version.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is a very stable solution.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is very scalable.

We have 40 users in our company.

Technical support is good. We have received very good support from them.

It was fairly easy to set up.

Pricing can always be improved and made more affordable.

I'm not involved in the pricing.

Consider it seriously, because I know we looked at ServiceNow, and ServiceNow was significantly more expensive. However, I do not believe the price is justified for our size organization. I believe it is one of those tools that provide excellent value for money.

I would rate ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus a nine out of ten.

We are using it for logging all the cases. We use it to track all the efforts, ensure that all requirements are met, tickets are recorded, and the work is being done by the respective teams.

Overall, its integration is good. There is a lot of integration that we have done. All alerts are coming to ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus.

Its VIP feature is also very useful where you can specify who are our VIPs. When the service desk engineer picks up the call and gets the name, he or she knows that the person is a VIP and treats him or her accordingly.

It also has a mobile interface. Anybody can use the app to log cases. It is easy for the end users as well as for the approving party. For the workflow, it is easier for senior managers to give approvals through the mobile interface.

It is sometimes a bit slow. If it can have a quicker response time, it would be good for users, service desk engineers, and technicians.

For service requests, they don't have an SLA for each priority. For a service request, the SLA of response or resolution is only one irrespective of the priority. SLA should be different for each priority. 

For a ticket, there is no response SLA for the service request. For resolution SLA, that is, P1, P2, P3, or whatever you define, you still have the same SLA. It should be different. 

I have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for the last six to seven years.

It is very stable.

It is very scalable. We have added a lot of additional modules after getting it installed. It didn't take time to add these features. There was also no change in overall features. Therefore, it is scalable. We have added more licenses and users to it, and it is working as expected. I have 4,000 users and 250 technicians.

They are very good. The response that I get from the ManageEngine support is one of the things because of which I would like to go for all ManageEngine tools. Their response is good. If I compare with any other similar tool, I am pretty sure it would take two to three days to reach them, but with ManageEngine, I get a response within the same day, and sometimes, the resolution is also provided on the same day.

The initial setup was very straightforward. Our team didn't find it hard to install it. Its graphical user interface is so easy, and it is very easy to implement this device. 

Its price is very lucrative. It would be great if the price can come down, but overall, its price is great. It is half or maybe one-third of the price of other market leaders.

I would very much recommend this solution. Everybody can go for it. It is a very easy tool. It is easy for the technicians as well as for end users. It is the best solution. 

I would rate ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus a nine out of ten because there is still room for improvement.

We have an application that we support. Any challenge that we find in the application we report in ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus and then we get it resolved by escalating to the vendor where necessary (The vendor manages the system infrastructure.)

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus has improved the IT standards with regards to the adherence of Service Level Agreements with the vendor. It's enabled the organization keep track of major incidents which affected the operations of the organization while measuring the performance of the vendor.

The features that I have found most valuable are the reporting module and how we configure the SLA.

Also, ManageEngine is flexible and user-friendly. Creating a ticket is quite easy. So is configuring SLAs and generating reports. It is straightforward to use.

I think the knowledge base management component could be improved a little bit. 

Compared to other ITSM tools, ServiceDesk will have to step up their knowledge base tools. If they could make it open enough to be integrated with other applications or other systems it would be very useful.

I have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for nine years.

It's the core reporting tool (for incidents and problems) for the organization that I am with.

In terms of the stability, the application is much more dependent on our availability of our network.

We are looking at options; whether to procure the new versions of ManageEngine or to look at other products like System Center Service Manager or ServiceNow and the rest. We haven't been able to scale to the newer versions. We've been using just the same version for so many years. 

We are now looking at testing and reviewing other products out there before we actually do the procurement.

Our workforce is more than five thousand (5000+).

As I said earlier, it is the vendor that manages the infrastructure and we are trying to change that. Going forward, the deployment as well as the infrastructure would be championed by our organization.

We maintained three (3) levels of support for incident escalations. The second (technical support) and third levels (application/database) of support were provided by vendor. That came with its challenges.

The initial setup wasn't complex; we contracted a vendor for the setup.

We implemented through a vendor.

Level of expertise rating:

On a scale of 1 to 10 (with 10 being excellent), I would rate them 7. 

Because I haven't been fortunate to see the upgrades of ManageEngine, I can only speak to what I already know, and that is, if there is any ITSM tool that I would want to use for any IT company I would definitely recommend ManageEngine, but that is what I'm used to.

Even though I haven't been able to test other products and I've used a very old version of ManageEngine, I still think it met our requirements and that it has everything that we need to work as an IT department. I'd definitely recommend ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus.

On a scale of one to ten, I would give ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus an eight.

I am enjoying the report features, they are quite good.

I expected more features than it has. The flexibility is missing. I was also expecting a different level of configuration and segregation. 

Stability is actually good.

It is scalable, but sometimes there are performance issues.

Technical support is quite good but they are not very quick to respond. It takes time to resolve the ticket.

I was not involved personally with the initial setup but from what I hear, it is not complex.

I was not involved with this part of the decision process.

It's our ticketing tool.

It's very easy to customize the tool to your business needs. 

There are many things. If you are a starter or small or medium-sized business, this tool is very good, but there are a few things that everybody would look forward to such as multi-tenancy and restricting some access but enabling it for a few people. Currently, I cannot configure more than one point of contact. I have the MSP version, and we have around 80 or 90 customers. I don't see the features where I can configure multiple contact points for a customer so that they're notified when we are having an outreach or when we want to send them a planned maintenance notification. Other things that are lacking are mapping SLAs with vendors and mapping back on the tickets.

In their CMDB or asset module, they don't have an option to mandate unique serial numbers. They don't have a check for unique serial numbers. So, right now, users can enter duplicated information, and I want to prevent this.

We have been using it in our organization for the last two years.

It isn't very stable. Off and on, it has bugs, and that's why they have a lot of releases coming up. You need to keep patching it. I wouldn't say that it's very stable. I would rate it a three out of five in terms of stability.

If I need to scale up, I need to look at other products. This tool is good for small and medium-sized organizations. If I'm growing the customer bases that I have and if I want to link them to the contracts that we have with other service providers to measure SLAs and other things, this is not the tool for it.

We have rolled it out to about 300 people in our organization. About 100 people use it on a daily basis.

Their support is good. 

Positive

It's straightforward. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of ease of setup.

Overall, I would rate it a six out of ten.