ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus Reviews

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is primarily used for service desk ticketing and instant management.

The workflow automation is the most valuable feature of this solution.

If you approve something, it automatically goes to the next person for approval.

It's quite good. 

It's quite intuitive.

The interface is not the best. The user interface could be more intuitive.

I have been working with ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for a few years.

I believe that we are working with the most recent version.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is a very stable solution.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is very scalable.

We have 40 users in our company.

Technical support is good. We have received very good support from them.

It was fairly easy to set up.

Pricing can always be improved and made more affordable.

I'm not involved in the pricing.

Consider it seriously, because I know we looked at ServiceNow, and ServiceNow was significantly more expensive. However, I do not believe the price is justified for our size organization. I believe it is one of those tools that provide excellent value for money.

I would rate ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus a nine out of ten.

We are using it for logging all the cases. We use it to track all the efforts, ensure that all requirements are met, tickets are recorded, and the work is being done by the respective teams.

Overall, its integration is good. There is a lot of integration that we have done. All alerts are coming to ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus.

Its VIP feature is also very useful where you can specify who are our VIPs. When the service desk engineer picks up the call and gets the name, he or she knows that the person is a VIP and treats him or her accordingly.

It also has a mobile interface. Anybody can use the app to log cases. It is easy for the end users as well as for the approving party. For the workflow, it is easier for senior managers to give approvals through the mobile interface.

It is sometimes a bit slow. If it can have a quicker response time, it would be good for users, service desk engineers, and technicians.

For service requests, they don't have an SLA for each priority. For a service request, the SLA of response or resolution is only one irrespective of the priority. SLA should be different for each priority. 

For a ticket, there is no response SLA for the service request. For resolution SLA, that is, P1, P2, P3, or whatever you define, you still have the same SLA. It should be different. 

I have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for the last six to seven years.

It is very stable.

It is very scalable. We have added a lot of additional modules after getting it installed. It didn't take time to add these features. There was also no change in overall features. Therefore, it is scalable. We have added more licenses and users to it, and it is working as expected. I have 4,000 users and 250 technicians.

They are very good. The response that I get from the ManageEngine support is one of the things because of which I would like to go for all ManageEngine tools. Their response is good. If I compare with any other similar tool, I am pretty sure it would take two to three days to reach them, but with ManageEngine, I get a response within the same day, and sometimes, the resolution is also provided on the same day.

The initial setup was very straightforward. Our team didn't find it hard to install it. Its graphical user interface is so easy, and it is very easy to implement this device. 

Its price is very lucrative. It would be great if the price can come down, but overall, its price is great. It is half or maybe one-third of the price of other market leaders.

I would very much recommend this solution. Everybody can go for it. It is a very easy tool. It is easy for the technicians as well as for end users. It is the best solution. 

I would rate ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus a nine out of ten because there is still room for improvement.

We have an application that we support. Any challenge that we find in the application we report in ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus and then we get it resolved by escalating to the vendor where necessary (The vendor manages the system infrastructure.)

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus has improved the IT standards with regards to the adherence of Service Level Agreements with the vendor. It's enabled the organization keep track of major incidents which affected the operations of the organization while measuring the performance of the vendor.

The features that I have found most valuable are the reporting module and how we configure the SLA.

Also, ManageEngine is flexible and user-friendly. Creating a ticket is quite easy. So is configuring SLAs and generating reports. It is straightforward to use.

I think the knowledge base management component could be improved a little bit. 

Compared to other ITSM tools, ServiceDesk will have to step up their knowledge base tools. If they could make it open enough to be integrated with other applications or other systems it would be very useful.

I have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for nine years.

It's the core reporting tool (for incidents and problems) for the organization that I am with.

In terms of the stability, the application is much more dependent on our availability of our network.

We are looking at options; whether to procure the new versions of ManageEngine or to look at other products like System Center Service Manager or ServiceNow and the rest. We haven't been able to scale to the newer versions. We've been using just the same version for so many years. 

We are now looking at testing and reviewing other products out there before we actually do the procurement.

Our workforce is more than five thousand (5000+).

As I said earlier, it is the vendor that manages the infrastructure and we are trying to change that. Going forward, the deployment as well as the infrastructure would be championed by our organization.

We maintained three (3) levels of support for incident escalations. The second (technical support) and third levels (application/database) of support were provided by vendor. That came with its challenges.

The initial setup wasn't complex; we contracted a vendor for the setup.

We implemented through a vendor.

Level of expertise rating:

On a scale of 1 to 10 (with 10 being excellent), I would rate them 7. 

Because I haven't been fortunate to see the upgrades of ManageEngine, I can only speak to what I already know, and that is, if there is any ITSM tool that I would want to use for any IT company I would definitely recommend ManageEngine, but that is what I'm used to.

Even though I haven't been able to test other products and I've used a very old version of ManageEngine, I still think it met our requirements and that it has everything that we need to work as an IT department. I'd definitely recommend ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus.

On a scale of one to ten, I would give ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus an eight.

I am enjoying the report features, they are quite good.

I expected more features than it has. The flexibility is missing. I was also expecting a different level of configuration and segregation. 

Stability is actually good.

It is scalable, but sometimes there are performance issues.

Technical support is quite good but they are not very quick to respond. It takes time to resolve the ticket.

I was not involved personally with the initial setup but from what I hear, it is not complex.

I was not involved with this part of the decision process.

It's our ticketing tool.

It's very easy to customize the tool to your business needs. 

There are many things. If you are a starter or small or medium-sized business, this tool is very good, but there are a few things that everybody would look forward to such as multi-tenancy and restricting some access but enabling it for a few people. Currently, I cannot configure more than one point of contact. I have the MSP version, and we have around 80 or 90 customers. I don't see the features where I can configure multiple contact points for a customer so that they're notified when we are having an outreach or when we want to send them a planned maintenance notification. Other things that are lacking are mapping SLAs with vendors and mapping back on the tickets.

In their CMDB or asset module, they don't have an option to mandate unique serial numbers. They don't have a check for unique serial numbers. So, right now, users can enter duplicated information, and I want to prevent this.

We have been using it in our organization for the last two years.

It isn't very stable. Off and on, it has bugs, and that's why they have a lot of releases coming up. You need to keep patching it. I wouldn't say that it's very stable. I would rate it a three out of five in terms of stability.

If I need to scale up, I need to look at other products. This tool is good for small and medium-sized organizations. If I'm growing the customer bases that I have and if I want to link them to the contracts that we have with other service providers to measure SLAs and other things, this is not the tool for it.

We have rolled it out to about 300 people in our organization. About 100 people use it on a daily basis.

Their support is good. 

Positive

It's straightforward. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of ease of setup.

Overall, I would rate it a six out of ten.

We use it for asset management, system tickets, trouble tickets, project management, software deployment, and remote control.

It has saved us downtime for project upgrades and saved time for the IT team not having to run around and manually install software.

The software deployment we find quite valuable - being able to deploy software to multiple endpoints without having to worry about getting in touch with the end users.

There are some performance issues. The solution we used before this ran through a centralized server for remote control and it was much more responsive than this one is. There is a bit of a lag with the remote control option.

There are occasionally some bugs with the ticket system. It probably happens about two or three times a day where I'm trying to enter a work log and it will not save it. Normally when you open it, it defaults to your name. But if it doesn't do that, then you have to refresh the screen. So I have to make sure that I copy all the notes that I logged, refresh the screen, then re-enter it all over again.

We have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for about five years.

From an IT perspective, we have probably close to 50 people using it - regular help desk users.

It does have ongoing maintenance. Our database administrator is responsible for maintaining it.

It is being used on a daily basis, 24/7, you can't really increase the usage.

I have not used it but from what I understand, their technical support is not that great.

The previous solution we used was outrageously expensive from what I understand.

The company was Computer Associates. I think it was just called ServiceDesk.

I wasn't involved with any of that. I think there are probably four to five people involved. And my guess is it probably took a few months. Gathering all the details, getting servers built, entering in assets.

I assume they have too have an ROI. Being able to track assets a lot better than what they used to. They've probably been able to save quite a bit. Especially saving man power on software deployments and patches and that type of thing.

On a scale of one to ten, I would give ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus probably about a seven.

I like the catalog features and workflow. I also like the knowledge space.

The workflow needs to be improved, along with form design.

It needs more customization and the ability to generate reports based on custom feeds. At present, if you create a custom feed in any form, you cannot create a report based on those criteria.

The scalability could be increased as well.

I've been working with ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for almost three years.

There are some glitches with regard to attachments. Sometimes, it crashes when we attach certain files. Otherwise, it's stable.

I think it could be more scalable.

Technical support has been very good.

The initial setup is straightforward and not complex.

We use the cloud model, which is subscription-based, and each year, the subscription fees seem to go up, making it a more expensive solution.

I would ask those who are considering ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus to test it to see if it will suit their environment because there are some limitations with regard to custom forms. You can link custom forms, but you cannot build whatever you want because of this issue. 

Also, the workflow can take two or three steps at maximum. It's not like an approval workflow with four or five steps.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus at eight.

Our primary use case is a ticket management tool for the end user in my company.

I have been impressed by how easy it is to operate and how easy the structure is to manage service tickets. If they request an incident problem train, it's a very strong model. Another strong feature in the tool is the CMDB.

Another feature that I'm currently studying is the IT project.

In terms of what can be improved, although the user interface is friendly enough, I struggle finding how the tool operates, how to master using the tool. I think the user interface needs to be improved and needs to be enhanced to be more supportive to users.

I personally have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for a few months. However, my team of technicians has two to three years experience working on that tool.

I personally have not had any bugs with this product.

In terms of cost and pricing, I'm not the person who pays for the tool, and I don't know if the price for the tool is fair or unfair. I have no idea about that. But I'm aware that it's quite expensive.

The price could be reduced,

Overall, I can recommend it because it is a very strong tool on the ITS. However, I would also recommend some other tools. For example, Service Now, or other commercial TMS tools.

On a scale from one to 10, I would rate Service Desk Plus a seven.