ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus Reviews

We use it for asset management, system tickets, trouble tickets, project management, software deployment, and remote control.

It has saved us downtime for project upgrades and saved time for the IT team not having to run around and manually install software.

The software deployment we find quite valuable - being able to deploy software to multiple endpoints without having to worry about getting in touch with the end users.

There are some performance issues. The solution we used before this ran through a centralized server for remote control and it was much more responsive than this one is. There is a bit of a lag with the remote control option.

There are occasionally some bugs with the ticket system. It probably happens about two or three times a day where I'm trying to enter a work log and it will not save it. Normally when you open it, it defaults to your name. But if it doesn't do that, then you have to refresh the screen. So I have to make sure that I copy all the notes that I logged, refresh the screen, then re-enter it all over again.

We have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for about five years.

From an IT perspective, we have probably close to 50 people using it - regular help desk users.

It does have ongoing maintenance. Our database administrator is responsible for maintaining it.

It is being used on a daily basis, 24/7, you can't really increase the usage.

I have not used it but from what I understand, their technical support is not that great.

The previous solution we used was outrageously expensive from what I understand.

The company was Computer Associates. I think it was just called ServiceDesk.

I wasn't involved with any of that. I think there are probably four to five people involved. And my guess is it probably took a few months. Gathering all the details, getting servers built, entering in assets.

I assume they have too have an ROI. Being able to track assets a lot better than what they used to. They've probably been able to save quite a bit. Especially saving man power on software deployments and patches and that type of thing.

On a scale of one to ten, I would give ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus probably about a seven.

I like the catalog features and workflow. I also like the knowledge space.

The workflow needs to be improved, along with form design.

It needs more customization and the ability to generate reports based on custom feeds. At present, if you create a custom feed in any form, you cannot create a report based on those criteria.

The scalability could be increased as well.

I've been working with ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for almost three years.

There are some glitches with regard to attachments. Sometimes, it crashes when we attach certain files. Otherwise, it's stable.

I think it could be more scalable.

Technical support has been very good.

The initial setup is straightforward and not complex.

We use the cloud model, which is subscription-based, and each year, the subscription fees seem to go up, making it a more expensive solution.

I would ask those who are considering ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus to test it to see if it will suit their environment because there are some limitations with regard to custom forms. You can link custom forms, but you cannot build whatever you want because of this issue. 

Also, the workflow can take two or three steps at maximum. It's not like an approval workflow with four or five steps.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus at eight.

Our primary use case is a ticket management tool for the end user in my company.

I have been impressed by how easy it is to operate and how easy the structure is to manage service tickets. If they request an incident problem train, it's a very strong model. Another strong feature in the tool is the CMDB.

Another feature that I'm currently studying is the IT project.

In terms of what can be improved, although the user interface is friendly enough, I struggle finding how the tool operates, how to master using the tool. I think the user interface needs to be improved and needs to be enhanced to be more supportive to users.

I personally have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for a few months. However, my team of technicians has two to three years experience working on that tool.

I personally have not had any bugs with this product.

In terms of cost and pricing, I'm not the person who pays for the tool, and I don't know if the price for the tool is fair or unfair. I have no idea about that. But I'm aware that it's quite expensive.

The price could be reduced,

Overall, I can recommend it because it is a very strong tool on the ITS. However, I would also recommend some other tools. For example, Service Now, or other commercial TMS tools.

On a scale from one to 10, I would rate Service Desk Plus a seven.

This is available on mobile and it is on the server, which helps us in management.

The management of this application is good.

I would like to improve the task management module and analytics.

I have been working with this solution for four years.

It is a stable solution. I rate the stability a nine out of ten. 

It is a scalable solution. I rate the scalability a seven out of ten. 

The technical support is good and helpful.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward. It takes two to three hours to install the server.

It is not an expensive solution.

I would recommend it to others, and rate it a seven out of ten overall.

This is a very elite and mature ManageEngine product. We are based in Pakistan and I'm the enterprise senior account manager.

The GUI is very good. The edge we get from using ManageEngine is the price and scalability.

ManageEngine currently offers a very basic MDM which I think should be expanded.

I've been using this solution for six years. 

The solution is stable. 

The scalability is good and it upgrades easily. 

The customer support has a slow response time. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

We primarily use the solution for service request management.

The product is extremely user-friendly. It is easy to build the workflows and electronic forms. We can build it by ourselves. It's great. However, I personally don't use the dashboards.

Feature-wise, the reporting is not quite satisfactory. They could work on improving it in future builds.

The solution, overall, is expensive.

I've been using the solution for less than a year. It really hasn't been that long just yet.

The solution is quite stable. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's great.

I can't speak to the scaling aspect of the solution. I've never tried to scale it.

We have about 50 users on the solution.

We have local technical support. 

We don't call ManageEngine. Our technical support will relay our question to the ManageEngine support if it comes down to that and they can't find the answers themselves.

I wasn't a part of the initial setup. It's my understanding that it's not too difficult. We have an entire in-house team that does all the deployment and upgrades.

It's not my team or my department who set it up. It's set up by the IT service department.

There's a yearly cost that's based on the number of licenses and the modules that you've purchased. The pricing is a bit high.

We compared this solution only based on our experience of using another change management system, the CA Service Desk Manager.

We're customers. We don't have a business relationship with Manage Engine.

We use the latest version of the solution.

I'd recommend the solution to other organizations.

Overall, I would rate the solution a six out of ten. If the pricing and reporting were better, I would rate it a bit higher.

We use it as a daily ticketing system for IT, in-house and on hardware.

Overall this is an easy and convenient solution to use.

We have experienced issues with tables, sheets and columns not displaying properly. This is temporarily fixed with updates but then reoccurs. The way tickets are displayed is messy. 

I have been using this solution for nine years. 

We have experienced some issues with stability which are temporarily fixed when updating to the latest version of the solution. 

We have 20 to 25 technicians using this system. 

The support for this product could be improved. Their engineers have not yet solved some of our issues. 

Neutral

The initial setup was straightforward. 

The implementation was done in-house. 

We have an annual license which we renew each year. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

We use this solution for our help desk, and for change management.

This solution has provided a way to manage request tracking and resolution.

The most valuable feature is the tracking of service requests.

Improvement is needed in the Software Assets Management functionality.