ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus Reviews

In our company, we use this solution on a daily basis as an administration application for reporting, where you can assign incident tickets or trade tickets and the relevant department uses it for follow up on problems or changes that have occurred.

I use it to create reports that show our teams where the issues are, what's going well, and what can be improved. My colleagues use it from a workflow perspective.

We have different organizations with a centralized help desk that will lock calls into groups of 20 or 30 people. We have a team that builds and customizes it and then we have all kinds of managers that pull out reports.

Finally, we have numerous end-users working on their own products. We also have external parties that provide services that use this application to work on incident problems and changes.

Previously, when we had incidents, we couldn't discover where the bug was coming from. Now, if we have an incident, we attach it to an application, and when we look at the application, we know the specific development machine, and we know that it's on specific hardware, as well as where this hardware is located on a specific data center. We know everything about the network connection, so it's easier to find issues. We now have good visibility of our entire information system.

When we change something in production, somewhere, we now can easily understand the risks we are taking. We know if this application is dependent on another. The visibility, the risk, and whether we want to do the change during the day, or overnight, for example, becomes very clear.

The CMDB and the database of assets that we are using are the most valuable features. After that, we really enjoy the incident management and change management features.

The solution offers a lot of opportunities for integrations. We can integrate with Slack,
Azure, all the API alternatives, etc. There's a lot of integration modules provided.

The solution is quite extensive, and I’ve only used the sections related to project management. I’m not sure if it was lacking any features. For me, it had everything I needed. I’ve never experienced any technical issues at all.

The only issue for us is the pricing, which is quite high in comparison with the competition.

The timing reporting module, and how it's used is a bit difficult to understand.

Everything related to project management is quite extensive and it needs to be simplified. At first, our users didn't want to use it, because it seemed a bit complex.

I've been using this solution for a few years.

We're using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for ticketing, incident management, and change management.

What I found most valuable in ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is its ticketing function plus change management, which helps us monitor all service requests within the team and even extend the requests to level two support.

I also found the ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus user interface intuitive and its menus, display, and report creation great.

In any product, there's always room for improvement, and my team is further evaluating which improvements should be added to ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus or any workaround or features that my team has yet to leverage with, but the file where my team listed the information isn't with me right now.

Customization has room for improvement in ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus. Currently, it's tricky to customize.

In the next release of the solution, I want the capability to add more fields to the dashboards.

I'm new in the company, so I'm a new user of ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus. I've been using it for almost two months.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is stable, and I can even access it off-premises or outside of the office.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is a scalable solution, so my company was able to add more users and utilize its features.

The technical support for ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is good, considering it's partnered with a local company here in the Philippines.

My colleagues previously used ServiceNow before using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus. Pricing was the reason the company switched to ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus.

When I joined the company, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus had been set up, so I have no information on how my company set it up.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus has reasonable pricing because my colleagues mentioned that the solution is more cost-effective than the previous one the company used.

We're evaluating ManageEngine OpManager, ADSS, and 360.

My company uses ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus and Desktop Central.

In the company, roughly two thousand plus people use ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, with less than twenty admins in charge of the maintenance.

My advice if you're planning to implement ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is to define the processes for which you want to use it. Next, you must have a dedicated person who will map your processes against the system's capability so that you can leverage or maximize the features offered by ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus.

My rating for ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is eight out of ten. If it was easy to customize, I could give it a ten.

My company is a ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus customer.

My primary use of the solution is not hands-on. I'm the architect. I was involved with getting the architecture going, getting the systems up and running. I've also got insights into the configuration. I'm not working with it on a day-to-day basis.

The product has been valuable and is working for us, looking from the angle of dealing with vendors, the AIOps space, as well as the SOC side of things. 

Cost-wise, we're quite happy. 

We engage with customers or vendors from Europe looking at AIOps products as well as SOC, and one downside to the solution is there are no native integrations between the systems. We're not even aware of any. This is a bit of a concern for us.

The problem I'm dealing with is now we have to employ people to do integration coding for us. We would love to have native integration between systems. ScienceLogic, Splunk, and Sumo Logic are three vendors we're considering currently, in a POC, for going forward with the AIOps side of things.

From the SIEM perspective, from the SOC, we're dealing with LogPoint; for SOAR purposes we're using inbound SOAR. None of these systems can natively integrate into ManageEngine. However, all of these systems can integrate into ServiceNow. If we consider the complications in our world, for integration purposes, and the amount of work that needs to be done for all these systems to talk to one another, that's definitely something. If ManageEngine can say, "we're going to help you with this," then we will most likely stick with the product.

ServiceNow can integrate, and there's a silent push towards ServiceNow, which I don't like because I'm quite keen on sticking with ME. ManageEngine should improve to help us to integrate the systems.

Then there's a customization level that needs to be done from our end, and it's quite a big concern. We're basically putting together all systems and software packages. 

I have been using the solution since we implemented it about a year and a half ago. We're still onboarding the rest of our clients. From an MSP perspective, we're managing multiple clients.

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. There's no problem with the software. I'm happy with what we can do with the system. I think the biggest concern for my industry is really a case of integrations between outside parties.

ManageEngine is easy to support.

With asset management in ServiceDesk Plus, it's not hard. It's not as robust as Ivanti.

The strength is its pricing. It is easy to use. It is not as complicated as Ivanti. 

In terms of enhancements, additional features for automatic asset discovery would be beneficial. Perhaps the ability to deploy an agent on the network to discover assets automatically.

So, I would like to see potentially more automation features.

Moreover, the reporting is not as good as Ivanti. So, ManageEngine could certainly improve on that.

I have been working with this product for six years now. 

The customer service and support are good. 

Positive

For the most part, it is easy to implement. There might be occasional glitches, but it's generally straightforward.

I've only used the on-premises version of ServiceDesk Plus.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

We use the product as an IT service desk and ticketing. 

The tool's most valuable feature is task creation. The tickets get timestamps of key points in the ticket lifecycle as well. 

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus changes need to be done in the production environment directly. There is no facility to make changes in the DEV environment and then move the changes to PROD. 

I have been working with the product since 2019. 

The solution is stable. 

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is scalable. 

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus' support is good. 

Neutral

The tool's deployment is easy. We have five resources to help with the deployment. 

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus' pricing is reasonable. 

I rate the tool a seven out of ten. 

I am using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus mainly for ticketing.

The most valuable feature of ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is ticket management.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus could improve by making asset management better. The professional version has asset management but it should be available in the free version, it would help my organization.

I have been using ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus for approximately two years.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is a stable solution.

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is a scalable solution.

We have 200 users using the solution in the free edition.

I have not used the support from ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus. Whenever there is any problem then I search online. We have not had an issue that we would need to contact support. We have found that the documentation online is 90 percent efficient.

The initial setup of ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is very easy.

I rate the initial setup of ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus a four out of five.

I am using the free edition of ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus. There are different versions available, such as professional. 

When comparing ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus to other solutions it is much easier to operate, manage, create users, and design incident tickets. Overall, everything is very easy.

I recommend this solution to others. It is important to know the port number they will be using before they proceed.

I rate ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus an eight out of ten.

Its interface is most valuable. It is easy to use, and our customers find it amazing because of that. Nowadays, it is not only IT technicians who deal with tickets. People from HR and finance also handle tickets, and not all of them are tech-savvy, so it is nice for them to have an interface that they can easily relate to. They appreciate that. 

It has a lot of modules, such as change management, project management, and all these are combined into one portal. So, we can manage projects from the same system, and we can do also change management, which is ITIL aligned.

Its pricing model makes it more affordable as compared to a lot of systems out there. So, it is affordable, and it also has the best service.

As a partner, their technical support can respond better to the tickets. We provide deployment services and also support products as a partner. We get a lot of tickets from clients complaining about certain issues related to the system, but when we send or escalate an issue to the agent, sometimes, there is a delay. That's something that they could improve on. Because we are a local partner, we are able to copy to some employees who can try to push a ticket to close, but it would be best if they can respond a bit quicker.

I have been using this solution for around six years. I have been using it since 2015.

Based on my experience, it is mostly available. So far, we haven't found any bugs in the system. ManageEngine is always giving updates and upgrades for any bugs or issues.

We have a tool for monitoring the 24/7 availability of the product or site. Most of the outages that take place in a month are not because of the system itself. They happen because the people who do the upgrade in the back office didn't notify us in time. This unpreparedness affects the availability of the system.

It is straightforward. There is detailed documentation that you can refer to while setting it up. You need to prepare the environment as per the specifications in the documentation. If you prepare your environment and meet the prerequisites, you can easily install it.

As compared to a lot of systems out there, it is more affordable.

I would rate ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus a nine out of 10. It is perfect, but there is always room for improvement.

Our primary use case for ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is to service our internal employees with in our company. We're continually optimizing this solution.

This solution has helped a lot by freeing up valuable time, allowing the IT personnel to work on other more critical areas, key projects, and perform their fundamental job requirements on time without interruption.

The most valuable features are the ticketing system and ticket handling features. I place a lot of value in our solutions centers. The solutions center functions as a troubleshooting hub as well as a problem-solving assistant. Finally, the remote desktop support service is of great value as they are very prompt and efficient.

When I think of improvements the first thing that comes to mind would have to be the active management function. I have encountered some bugs with this aspect of the tool. I wouldn't necessarily identify these issues as bugs, they're more like processes issues associated with the scanning assets; the process could be improved.

The solution is quite stable. No issues so far. In reference to the downtime, we're hosting on our client's premises.

The only thing I would change regarding the scalability would have to be the capacity. We need to use a different database to manage more than 1,000 employees.

Technical support has been very good. They respond on the same day, and if the issue persists they are agile and responsive in their dealings concerning ongoing support. For example, they offer remote assistance; they can debug the issue remotely. 

We didn't have a previous solution. Before this, we used traditional email messaging and placing phone calls. When our user base increased significantly we started to think about investing in ticketing, or a service desk management solution.

We evaluated other providers. We had a short list which included SysAid, and Freshservice. 

I rate this solution a solid 7.5 out of ten since the tool comes with different modules. Albeit some of these modules, including exit management module, need some improvements. But regarding the ticketing as a stand-alone, it's pretty good. But the other modules need improvement.

I recommend this tool for anyone thinking of implementing enterprise IT management software for their service management, operations management, active directory, and security needs. The tool offers the ability to manage different employee groups along with the option of providing other services for different company structures.