MuleSoft API Manager Reviews

The primary use case is for partners to exchange data and information with our company. It can be board members, as well as customers that can connect with us in order to exchange data. 

Overall the platform is good. The stability of the platform is very good. The entire solution has worked well for us. 

Whenever there was an issue, the support was excellent. 

I work with the solution more from a strategy perspective. I don't get into the day to day of how it is run and things like that so I'm not sure if I'd be able to get into features or what may be missing.

The pricing is quite expensive. It should be adjusted to make it more affordable for users.

When they come up with a completely new version of the solution and there is no direct upgrade for the customer from the older version to the new version there's a lot of work to be done. Whatever time and money you have invested cannot be directly used in the new platform.

When they come up with a new version release or a new platform the customers, existing requirements, etc. should be transferred over easier. Migration every time there is a new version is difficult. It's something that they could fix.

I've been using the solution for the last three years.

The stability of the solution is excellent.

The scalability of the solution is very good.

We've found technical support to be excellent. We've been very satisfied with the level of service that the solution provides.

The initial setup isn't complex, although when you are installing the solution you need a moderate amount of competency.

Deployment took about six months.

The licensing costs for the solution are quite high.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Mainly the pricing is the big down-side of the solution. 

I'd advise others to ensure that they need to have the right partner who understands the system before they get into the implementation process.

The product is very lightweight and easy to setup, build and deploy APIs.

As a B2B2C company, our goal is to provide a clean interface to our systems. With Anypoint API Manager we have been able to quickly develop a standard API gateway. Plus, we developed a custom API solution for our key client by reusing most of the components.

Load balancing may be an area of improvement.

Two years.

No issues.

No.

No.

Good level, they respond quickly and escalate as well if needed.

Technical support is part of Mulesoft professional services, so it's not included in the solution.

No, setup has been easy, we setup a whole stack dev to production within a business day.

We implemented it in-house.

It's a per core pricing, maybe if your number of cores raise up quickly prices can escalate.

Apache Camel and TIBCO. TIBCO was much more expensive than Mulesoft and not so easy to configure. Apache Camel lacked of web management console.

We are a solution provider and this is one of the products that we implement for our clients.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager has many use cases that involve API integration.

The most valuable features are API development and API management. 

From a management point of view, this solution is okay. It is more lightweight than the runtime module.

The most important thing that should be improved is that it is too heavy. Even the API gateway and the API runtime are too heavy, which makes it more difficult to integrate. With the talk of microservice nowadays, this is something that needs to be improved.

It is not very easy to integrate into other platforms, such as those from IBM.

I have been using the Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager for between three and four years.

The initial setup is straightforward.

Frankly speaking, I don't think that Mulesoft is doing an extremely good job. It may be because it's not that easy to satisfy me from an API point of view, whether in development, maintenance, or management. I have been working in this area for quite a long time and my standards are a little bit high. That said, this is a competitive market and I understand that it is not easy to make a good product.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I have API experience with the entire lifecycle using Mulesoft.

This solution is widely used in API integration and there are many different use cases for it.

The most important features are the API management and API development.

I don't think that Mulesoft is doing an extremely good job.

The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is too heavy and some platforms are difficult to integrate with. The API gateway and API runtime are too heavy, which means that it is not suitable for microservices.

I have been using the Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager for three or four years.

I have been in touch with technical support.

I have a great deal of API experience and I feel that Mulesoft could be doing better. It may be that my standards are a little bit high.

The initial setup is straightforward. From a management point of view, it is okay.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Our primary use is the interconnectivity of exposed APIs. The transformation layer is huge on the MuleSoft platform.

The most valuable feature is the scalability.

With respect to the live help, I have language issues because I can't understand some of the things that I hear.

I just recently completed the Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager training, and have just begun working to get things set up. I am still learning my way around the platform.

My company has two active connections.

Stability-wise, it has been excellent.

Scalability is one of the key features of this solution. We're just at the beginning so we do plan on increasing usage.

Technical support for this product is excellent.

The resources are out there.

The initial setup is complex.

We deployed with our in-house team.

Our largest return on investment is a specific use case called Digital Account Opening. As a financial services firm, this is a process that entails paperwork, fax machines, and so on. With the implementation of this solution, it's going to be automatic.

The pricing is very expensive, although you get a lot of power from the product. We're just scratching the surface of it.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

My primary use case is investigating the pros and cons of different platforms for the benefit of the application lifecycle. This includes security and other aspects. One of my goals is to make it easier to create API inventories.

The most valuable feature is the ability to investigate APIs.

The interface could be made more user-friendly.

Better documentation to help explain each of the features would be really helpful.

I have been using Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager for about six months.

I have not needed to contact technical support.

The initial setup was straightforward. The length of time required for deployment varies based on the requirements. It is not always the same, but the average is a few hours.

I implemented this solution.

This is a good solution but nothing is perfect and there is always room for improvement.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Our primary use case is for connecting IT systems between each other. Because there are so many interconnections. It makes the connection easy to manage and simplify.

The developer portal is easy to integrate. It is easy to use, easy to integrate, and I like the developer portal.

I would like to see more automation. Our operations are mainly between the IT applications and manual site transfer. Operations are done manually. It should also automate in the operation.

It's new, you could say that we're beginners. 

The stability is good. They are powerful products.

The initial setup was easy.

The price is a bit expensive. It's hard to budget.

I would rate Mulesoft an eight out of ten. Not a ten because of the pricing. 

I would recommend it.