Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Double-parity RAID guarantees that our data stays intact
Pros and Cons
  • "One of the most valuable features offered is double-parity RAID, which guarantees that your data will stay intact. We're also able to provision storage and monitor which ones are really consuming storage."
  • "It lacks automatic tiering, When you use data, some of it goes cold. It is not hot data, so the system should automatically move that data to the SATA, while the hot data is kept on tier-one, the SaaS or SSD drives."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case is for regular databases and file systems. So far it has been good. The performance is solid, it's robust, availability is solid.

How has it helped my organization?

We're able to keep data for a longer time because we are able to manage it well using the features that NetApp provides. It has also helped us to quickly deploy our test environment and finish all of our testing before we deploy on the customer side or the customer systems. It has really helped in our operations and our productivity.

What is most valuable?

One of the most valuable features offered is double-parity RAID, which guarantees that your data will stay intact. You can experience two disk failures and still be up. Another feature is the deduplication. It saves a lot of space. We're also able to provision storage and monitor which ones are really consuming storage.

What needs improvement?

I want to see the system automatically tier; we call it auto-tiering. When you use data, some of it goes cold. It is not hot data, so the system should automatically move that data to the SATA, while the hot data is kept on tier-one, the SaaS or SSD drives.

Buyer's Guide
NetApp FAS Series
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about NetApp FAS Series. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is solid. You can go over 3,000 days without a reboot or any downtime. It's so stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is also good. You can scale on the fly, just connect the cables. If you're adding a controller or you're adding big shelves, it's easy to move. It's excellent.

How are customer service and support?

I'll give technical support a "good" rating because sometimes it's slow in getting people to respond, other times it's okay.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

When I arrived at the company they were using NetApp, and we are still using NetApp.

When selecting a vendor, I first look at how robust the solution is that they're proposing, and how available they are to answer calls if there are any issues. This is very critical. The robustness of the solution and the availability of the vendor to attend to queries are important components of my selection criteria. After-sales support is also very key.

How was the initial setup?

The initial configuration is very straightforward. You just cable up your system, power up, connect your power cables, connect to the console, boot up the system, do your system configuration, IP configuration, and all the other configurations, and the system is up and good to run.

What other advice do I have?

If I were to advise someone researching NetApp FAS Storage or a similar solution, I would want to understand what they really want. I would advise them to go with NetApp because it's unified storage. It supports both NAS and SAN environments, so whether you're doing block storage or you're doing file storage, it is a good solution. Also, the operating system that it runs is called Data ONTAP, and is cloud-ready, so in the future the file storage that you have can be deployed to the cloud.

I rate this solution a 9.9 out of 10 because it's never failed me so I'm very comfortable with it.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Storage and System Engineer at Thales Services SAS
Real User
The storage efficiency provided maximum savings in our storage utilization
Pros and Cons
  • "Using the built-in Snapshots and SnapMirror technology, we were able to have better working data protection locally and off-site."
  • "The storage efficiency provided a maximum savings in our storage utilization."
  • "The AutoSupport could be improved to be more proactive in certain cases."
  • "When getting new hardware, always tell the account manager that you are also considering other brands. They will be forced to adjust the price lower."

What is our primary use case?

We recently upgraded our NetApp environment from 7-Mode to Clustered ONTAP v9.3. Primary use cases are NFS and CIFS. NFSs are used for VMware data store while the CIFSs are for corporate file sharing.

How has it helped my organization?

Using the built-in Snapshots and SnapMirror technology, we were able to have better working data protection locally and off-site. The storage efficiency also provided maximum savings in our storage utilization.

What is most valuable?

Other tools, like OnCommand Unified Manager and Config Advisor, help us a lot in managing our environment.

What needs improvement?

None at the moment for the box itself. We are very happy with the current capabilities of this hardware. 

Hopefully, the AutoSupport can be improved to be more proactive in certain cases.

For how long have I used the solution?

Less than one year.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

When getting new hardware, always tell the account manager that you are also considering other brands. They will be forced to adjust the price lower.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
NetApp FAS Series
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about NetApp FAS Series. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user346119 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Engineer at a government with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
We were able to restore a lot of data in about an hour, although NetApp OnCommand, which has been a lot better recently, could still be made faster.

What is most valuable?

The integration with VMware is the most valuable feature for us because we run a lot of VMs and the backup is very good when you run your VM in NFS.

How has it helped my organization?

We had a case when they had to restore a lot of data. We went back one hour and got back everything. The restore itself only took about an hour.

What needs improvement?

Some of the tools could be improved like NetApp OnCommand. This has been a lot better recently, but they could make it faster.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using it since 2005.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's very stable and I’ve never experienced any problems in 10 years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It scales to our needs.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

8/10 - only because it is impossible to have a 10, as there is no one that good. We’ve had a good experience with their customer service.

Technical Support:

The solutions that are present on NetApp’s website are enough usually, but when it is tough for me to resolve it on my own I go to our consultant.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did a long time ago.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup was pretty straightforward. We started on a small scale and built it up.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it in-house, but we use a consulting company to help. Now, we run it on our own.

What was our ROI?

It fulfills the needs we have for storing data well. We had a lot of storage spread out over many devices from many vendors and now everything is consolidated. It saves a lot of time.

What other advice do I have?

Ask other people who use it as references are really valuable.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user332643 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Data Storage Engineer III at University of Kentucky
Vendor
Snapshots lets us revert accidental deletes quickly and easily, and although we had an outage when batteries were bad, it was a known defect and our fault for knowing this was an issue.

Valuable Features

Snapshot, because so much of it is on our end-user storage, our users often delete things they’re not supposed to. Having snapshots to revert these deletes quickly and easily is very valuable.

Improvements to My Organization

Our greatest advantage with it is ease of use, flexibility, and reliability.

Room for Improvement

Knowing what’s coming down the pipe, NetApp is headed in the right direction. In their five year roadmap, it provides what I need it to do.

Stability Issues

It's extraordinarily stable. We had one outage one-and-a-half years ago when batteries were bad, but that was a known defect on that particular model. However, that was our fault for knowing this was an issue. We've had two outages in 10 years due to something other than operator’s error.

Scalability Issues

Incredibly scalable. Not even touching what it could do. Between scale up and scale out, we’re not even close to reaching its highest potential. We have a four node NAS with the potential for 24 nodes.

Customer Service and Technical Support

It's fantastic.

Initial Setup

Once you’ve done one, it seems very intuitive. However, the first time seems very complicated.

Other Advice

Of all storage technologies I work on, it’s the easiest to learn and one of the most powerful. But you need to spend your time taking classes before digging in too deep. Get educated.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user332619 - PeerSpot reviewer
Storage Engineer III at Providence Health & Services
Vendor
We use the NAS functions for all our file shares, although I wish we could do dedupe for the entire system and not just a specific volume.

Valuable Features

NAS functions, as it's primarily used for all our file shares. We have other NAS devices, but this is easier.

Also, High Availability is a valuable feature.

Improvements to My Organization

Snapshots are good, especially the snap mirror, which we use for disaster recovery and backups. Also, we have a lot of data centers (seven primary centers) and we deploy at each of them.

Room for Improvement

I miss their old support structure. We used to be able to call up and get an answer pretty quickly, but now it’s more arduous.

It could be cleaner for dedupe, and I wish we could do dedupe for the entire system and not just a specific volume.

Stability Issues

It's highly reliable, but has had the occasional bug. We install patches or shut off features.

Scalability Issues

Depends on how you’re scaling. If wide, it works well. Vertical scaling not so well because we’re primarily SMB. No matter how brief, people don’t like being offline (e.g. baby monitors).

Customer Service and Technical Support

I’ve worked with them for over 10 years. They used to be stellar, but in the last three to five years, not as reliable. The quality of information you get from them is less specialist, and they've not broken it up so that you get routed to a particular technology, it used to be one senior guy who knew everything.

Initial Setup

There’s always networking issues, but not related to NetApp.

Other Advice

Other than tech support, it loses points because it could always be better.

It depends on what you’re implementing. Consider carefully what you want to do – for example, have enough vLANs because you don’t want to be adding more later.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user325839 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user325839Freelance Writer at a writing and editing position with 51-200 employees
Vendor

Do they support smb 3, nfs 4, object based storage? Are there tiering?

it_user332232 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Architect at a aerospace/defense firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
We can give people large amounts of storage for projects, and then remove it, though improvements could be made to the translation between 7-mode and cDOT.

Valuable Features

We have clusters, and can do non-distruptive upgrades with cDOT and can spin up VMs as needed. We have the flexibility to give people NAS storage.

Improvements to My Organization

With NAS storage in general, we can give people large amounts of storage for projects, and then remove it. For example, for SLS, they can spin up large amounts of storage to hold the output of modeling data, and when that’s done, they can delete it and move on. In that case, they don’t need the throughput.

We have thousands and thousands of file shares and we’re able to offer up to one terabyte of storage, and this gives us high compression and dedupe.

Room for Improvement

For cDOT in general, improvements could be made to the little things, such as the translation between 7-mode and cDOT. If there’s some kind of backward compatibility or translation of certain functions from one to the other, that would be an improvement.

Stability Issues

It's very stable.

Scalability Issues

With cDOT, it's very good. It scales horizontally well, but not so well with 7-mode.

Customer Service and Technical Support

It’s top-notch support, very responsive and highly knowledgeable, very attentive to us as we have a monthly meeting with our TAM.

Initial Setup

It's straightforward in 7-mode, but using cDOT, it's terrible.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user332232 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user332232IT Architect at a aerospace/defense firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor

There is a transition tool that will move the data from 7-mode to CDOT. However, SnapVault relationships cannot be retained when moving from 7-mode to CDOT. This means that multiple copies of the data must be retained until SLA expiration policies allow for it to be deleted (in my case, years). I was speaking specifically about the translation of commands used to admin the system. Commands you knew by heart in 7-mode no longer work in CDOT. There are many things to like about CDOT, which is why we are making the move, but there are many things that don't work as well as they did in 7-mode. For instance, there is no ability to disable NETBIOS over TCP in CDOT and active directory integration is much harder to setup and manage.

See all 2 comments
it_user330882 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior IT Tech-Architect, Storage at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
It's added benefits are thin provisioning, compressioning, and dedupe, which help with capacity utilization.

Valuable Features

Being able to run any flavor of files and block storage. It's easier to manage, and we’re looking to phase out legacy systems and to go with FAS.

Improvements to My Organization

It's easy to manage regardless of how you’re utilizing platform. It’s a Swiss army knife of capabilities. Flexible platform and software features are added benefits (thin provisioning, compressioning, dedupe), which help with capacity utilization. Still get a lot of return even if going with best-practices application.

Room for Improvement

Make sure there’s current centralized virtual desktops. I get caught in the upgrade matrix quite a bit, which is an indication that it hasn’t been tested. Need more currency in IMT.

Stability Issues

It's solid, with occasional issues that surface, but are quickly resolved. No one’s software is perfect.

Scalability Issues

It’s good, but you have to do a lot of homework to scale horizontally and vertically. You need to have sales and engineering to expend effort to do that homework.

Customer Service and Technical Support

We've frequently used it, and the quality will depend on which level of support you purchased. Premium support, I have no complaints as we get the right person who’s knoweldgable. Higher level guys take great deal of personal ownership over issues. I used their support as benchmark for our organization.

Initial Setup

It's easy. The more planning you do, the easier it gets.

Other Advice

The monitoring is key, and you must keep track of what’s going on. Be sure to use auto-support and have strong monitoring scenario in place.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
It comes with an OS developed by its engineers, and its clustered data ONTAP, which supports clustering and high-level scalability.

What is most valuable?

  • Deduplication
  • High Availability

How has it helped my organization?

It provides us with a very effective storage solution.

What needs improvement?

The virtualization technology.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for over three years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Absolutely, it’s just some compatibility variance with some of the production environment aspects, like AV, and Archiving systems which needed to be integrated with.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Not at all as the HA features are great.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

NetApp comes with an OS developed by its engineers, and its clustered data ONTAP, which supports clustering and scalability to a high level.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

The support team supports us as vendor partner with a lot of tools. And the auto-support feature is just as amazing as the product, whenever a disk fails or any issue occurred the features sends alerts to you and to the customer, and send you a replacement of the disk right away, in a very effective manner, and quickly, that you may do not notice that there’s an issue in your that disk.

Technical Support:

10/10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I deal with a lot of solutions similar in the concept with NetApp FAS, but when it comes to NetApp, there are too many features that means it worth it.

How was the initial setup?

It was clear and straightforward, as you console the device, and it boots, you configure and initialize the product, and as soon as that is done, you are ready to create your aggregates, volumes, and shares.

What about the implementation team?

We are an integrator, and we also have an in house device that we run our test labs on.

The NetApp technical team is very supportive, and they can, in some complex and large projects, come and share the in-site implementation with their partner.

What was our ROI?

We can't calculate this.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Prices may seem to be a little bit expensive, but the features just makes you happy that you took the step, and licensing is all included except a very few features, with a high end and complex environment.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

EMC

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We're a partner.
PeerSpot user
it_user3396 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user3396Team Lead at Tata Consultancy Services
Top 5Real User

Great

See all 2 comments