


The NetApp FAS Series and IBM FlashSystem compete in enterprise storage solutions. Users have pointed out that while NetApp offers a comprehensive set of features, IBM stands out in performance, particularly for high-speed, low-latency scenarios.
Features: The NetApp FAS Series provides robust data management with features like data deduplication, high availability, and ONTAP for multiprotocol support. It's well-regarded for its integration with large virtual environments, notably VMware. IBM FlashSystem is noted for speed and simplicity, excelling in low latency and IOPS management. It incorporates features such as compression and effective data handling, supporting performance-critical applications efficiently.
Room for Improvement: NetApp FAS Series could benefit from better pricing structures, improved interoperability with evolving cloud technologies, and enhancements in user experience for management and automation. Users of IBM FlashSystem suggest a need for better scalability, enhanced compression capabilities, and cost efficiency, along with improved cloud integration and responsive technical support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both NetApp FAS Series and IBM FlashSystem are commonly deployed on premises, offering hybrid cloud options. NetApp FAS is praised for its extensive support resources, although some users report delays from third-party support. IBM is appreciated for its knowledgeable support, although improvements in timeliness and technical adaptability are desired. Customer service for both is viewed positively but can improve in field assistance during complex setups.
Pricing and ROI: NetApp FAS Series is competitively priced with bundled features providing good value for multiprotocol environments. Pricing varies based on specific configurations, with suggestions to improve support costs. IBM FlashSystem, with a potentially higher price point, justifies costs with its performance metrics. Both systems demonstrate positive ROI, contingent on specific deployment requirements and scalability needs.
In the long term, spanning three to five years, the total cost of ownership becomes cheaper, considering power consumption, data center footprint, and NVMe technology usage.
Our current workload, particularly the SQL use case, would not be possible on mechanical storage, and the ease of use for the small team for the array is important for supporting that workload.
Pure Storage FlashArray integrates with APIs and other systems.
The solution can comfortably be stretched from five to seven years without any failures, ensuring a long-lasting return.
We have seen return on investment compared to other OEMs, which took approximately three years after implementing IBM FlashSystem.
If you have the configuration well maintained and configured, you should have good efficiency and compression for the clients and for yourself.
Pure's support organization is responsive with minimal bureaucracy, making support a key factor in customer retention.
I would rate the technical support an 11 out of 10.
The support from Pure Storage is excellent.
Customers of alternatives like Dell and Hitachi enjoy more reliable and comprehensive support services directly from vendors rather than third-party subsidiaries.
I rate the technical support from IBM as a ten.
IBM customer support is responsible, efficient, and responsive, though it is expensive.
Sometimes, the support was inadequate because the initial architecture was poorly defined.
We are also using it ourselves for the SAN and CIFS protocol.
They often provide basic solutions, such as suggesting a failover or a power cycle, which are not the sophisticated solutions we expect from a vendor.
A big banking client had around 300 petabytes of data on Pure Storage.
Our customers can scale up or scale out, raise the performance, and expand the storage spaces by investing every year.
The solution is highly scalable, particularly when there is a need to expand capacity.
For larger enterprises, scalability is an issue as the price becomes prohibitive.
The problem arises when migrating data to a later IBM FlashSystem version due to issues with firmware compatibility.
The scalability of IBM FlashSystem is exceptional, and I rate it as a nine.
We normally avoid current versions and use versions that have been running for at least two months in client usage before updating drivers.
NetApp FAS Series is scalable, and it is possible, but you need to pay.
The NetApp FAS Series is scalable and offers numerous solutions, but only if customers are willing to invest in the shelves.
For stability, I rate it a ten out of ten.
We have continuous 99.9% uptime and do not experience any users reporting performance issues due to latency.
The vision Pure Storage FlashArray offers through the GUI is clearer; we can discern the status, what is cabled, and how direct flash is enabled.
Customers have infrastructure that is 100% stable.
The firmware and software engine have fewer bugs, which enhances operational efficiency.
When panic occurs on the node, it reboots itself, and we have experienced numerous hardware-related issues.
Most things are tailor-made, and we avoid downtimes even with primitive CLI commands.
Integrating object storage into the FlashArray would benefit entry-level and SMB customers by offering a more unified solution.
Storing cold data on expensive arrays doesn't make financial sense, and tiering to any of the big three cloud providers would be advantageous.
As a technical professional, I lack visibility into the system logs.
Despite marketing promises, these features do not function effectively and can impact performance.
There is room for improvement in the troubleshooting part, specifically related to IBM Spectrum for Insight.
An additional function that could be helpful is reducing the time it takes to delete volumes, especially if they are compressed or deduplicated.
Storage companies should create encrypted storage solutions between the OS and storage to protect against ransomware attacks.
Nutanix leads the business in this approach, and I feel that NetApp is missing some aspects, such as CPU, GPU, and RAM, in its AI portfolio.
There is an opportunity there for NetApp with Cloud Volumes ONTAP.
They're expensive.
While they say it's free, we actually pay for support upfront.
Some smaller organizations may find it slightly expensive, but for enterprises, when considering performance, future hardware investments, and overall benefits, it is a very cost-effective solution for mid and enterprise organizations.
To install or upgrade any software features, the cost is high, which makes it challenging for smaller companies who do not require advanced features like deduplication or compression typically needed by larger organizations.
The pricing is high; storage solutions are always expensive.
The pricing of NetApp FAS Series is not cheap, but in comparison to other vendors, NetApp FAS Series is affordable.
FlashArray's integration with the Pure One instrument provides a centralized platform for efficient management of all arrays.
Another noteworthy aspect is their platform, Pure One, a cloud-based analytics platform that automatically creates a case and sends out a part if a disk or controller fails.
It handles internal data migration seamlessly in the background without going offline, achieving a hundred percent uptime.
There is a significant amount of data reduction, achieving a ratio of one to three.
The most valuable features are performance and reliability.
There is built-in compression, a data reduction feature, and artificial intelligence-driven insights that calculate warnings and errors to redirect to customers automatically.
While NVMe disks are expensive and require three disks for parity calculations, hard drives in NetApp FAS Series are inexpensive, making it more cost-efficient per GB, even with RAID tech implementation.
Our IOPS are very high, reaching somewhere about 50k to 150k or 1.150k.
One important feature for customers is its ease of use and continuity, enabling seamless usage across on-premise and cloud environments.



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 64 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 151 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 47 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 59 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 38 |
| Large Enterprise | 58 |
Everpure Storage FlashArray delivers simplicity, speed, and performance with ease of management and data reduction capabilities. Its resilience and seamless upgrades complement its integration with VMware, while predictive analytics and proactive support enhance reliability.
Everpure Storage FlashArray leverages a flash-based architecture for improved storage efficiency, reduced footprint, and outstanding data management through deduplication and compression. Users appreciate its single pane of glass management and Evergreen model. It supports VMware environments effectively, offering predictive analytics for better operational insights. The system is noted for its user-friendly management and proactive support, ensuring minimal downtime while delivering resilient storage solutions.
What Key Features Does Everpure Storage FlashArray Offer?
What Benefits Should Users Consider?
In industries like finance, banking, and healthcare, Everpure Storage FlashArray supports high-performance storage needs focusing on virtualization and database environments. Employed for VMware workloads, disaster recovery, and storage provisioning, it ensures application performance in private or hybrid cloud setups while enhancing management of virtualized environments.
IBM FlashSystem offers high performance with reliable speed and low latency. It facilitates efficient storage management through its robust features, ensuring ease of integration with existing infrastructure. Ideal for industries needing advanced storage, it stands out with its user-friendly approach.
IBM FlashSystem is designed to cater to a range of industries such as banking, healthcare, and telecom. It is optimal for virtualization, databases, and backup, supporting applications like ERP, SAP, and robotic process automation. Known for its seamless data migration and strong hardware, FlashSystem enhances any setup with comprehensive virtualization capabilities. Its integration with technologies like IBM Spectrum and SVC makes it a versatile choice for boosting data performance and storage solutions.
What are the key features of IBM FlashSystem?Implementing IBM FlashSystem in industries like banking and healthcare allows organizations to optimize data management. Its compatibility with top ERPs and support for robust applications ensure enhanced productivity. In telecom, its virtualization performance supports heavy data loads, making it a trusty ally for data-centric tasks.
NetApp FAS Series offers high availability and seamless protocol integration. Known for its robust features such as data replication and efficient storage architecture, it finds use in challenging enterprise environments and virtualization.
NetApp FAS Series delivers valuable enterprise storage capabilities with an emphasis on unified storage architectures supporting SAN and NAS functionalities. Features like high availability, robust snapshot technology, and seamless protocol integration cater to diverse workloads. Data replication through SnapMirror and reliable performance under heavy loads are appreciated. Deduplication and compression enhance storage efficiency while scalability, resilience, and strong customer support further its appeal. Improvements are desired in flexibility, documentation, speed, and affordability. Additionally, its monitoring capabilities and cloud integration need attention. Organizations employ FAS Series for enterprise storage, SQL Server LUNs, Exchange LUNs, VMware, and corporate file sharing.
What are the most notable features of NetApp FAS Series?In industries such as finance and healthcare, NetApp FAS Series is implemented for centralized data management, supporting complex protocols like NFS, CIFS, and iSCSI. This enables efficient handling of virtualization, databases, unified storage tasks, and backup solutions crucial for maintaining unstructured data and redundancy.
We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.